Method Article
We describe a protocol for colorimetric detection of E. coli using a modified litmus test that takes advantage of an RNA-cleaving DNAzyme, urease, and magnetic beads.
There are increasing demands for simple but still effective methods that can be used to detect specific pathogens for point-of-care or field applications. Such methods need to be user-friendly and produce reliable results that can be easily interpreted by both specialists and non-professionals. The litmus test for pH is simple, quick, and effective as it reports the pH of a test sample via a simple color change. We have developed an approach to take advantage of the litmus test for bacterial detection. The method exploits a bacterium-specific RNA-cleaving DNAzyme to achieve two functions: recognizing a bacterium of interest and providing a mechanism to control the activity of urease. Through the use of magnetic beads immobilized with a DNAzyme-urease conjugate, the presence of bacteria in a test sample is relayed to the release of urease from beads to solution. The released urease is transferred to a test solution to hydrolyze urea into ammonia, resulting in an increase of pH that can be visualized using the classic litmus test.
Bacterial pathogens are one of the major causes of global morbidity and mortality. Outbreaks from hospital-acquired infections, food-borne pathogens, and bacterial contaminants in the environment pose serious and on-going threats to public health and safety. To prevent these outbreaks, effective tools are needed that permit pathogen detection in a timely fashion under a variety of settings. Simple but still effective tests that are portable and cost-effective are greatly coveted, especially in regions that are susceptible to outbreaks but cannot afford expensive testing facilities.1-3 Although there exists a multitude of methods to detect bacteria, many of them are not suitable as screening or on-site testing tools because they require long test times, expensive instruments and complicated testing procedures.
Colorimetric tests are particularly attractive for point-of-care or field applications as color changes can be easily detected by the naked eye. The litmus test for pH is simple, quick, and effective. Although it is a very old technology, it is still widely used today because of its simplicity and effectiveness. Surprisingly, this simple test had never been modified to achieve the detection of other analytes before we recently developed an approach of modifying this test for E. coli testing.4
The expanded litmus test for E. coli employs three additional components: an E. coli activated RNA-cleaving DNAzyme (EC1), 5 urease, and magnetic beads. DNAzymes refer to synthetic single-stranded DNA molecules with catalytic activity.6 They can be isolated from random-sequence DNA pools using in vitro selection.7,8 They are highly stable and can be produced cost-effectively using high-efficiency automated DNA synthesis.9 For these reasons, DNAzymes, particularly RNA-cleaving DNAzymes, have been widely examined for biosensing applications.6,10,11 RNA-cleaving DNAzyme sensors have been developed to detect metal ions,12-16 small molecules,17,18 bacterial pathogens5,19-21 and cancer cells.22 Given the great availability of target-induced RNA-cleaving DNAzymes, any assay that utilizes a DNAzyme can be potentially expanded to detect a diverse range of analytes.
Urease is chosen for its ability to hydrolyze urea into ammonia,23,24 resulting in a pH increase. Urease is also highly efficient, stable and amenable for conjugation to other biomolecules. Therefore, we postulated that a conjugate of an RNA-cleavage DNAzyme with urease would allow the use of litmus test for the detection of other targets.5
The action of the RNA-cleaving DNAzyme is relayed to urease-mediated increase of pH through the use of magnetic beads that are immobilized with the DNAzyme-urease conjugate. Because the activity of the DNAzyme under investigation is strictly dependent on E. coli, the presence of this bacterium in the test solution will result in the release of urease from the magnetic beads to the solution, which is then taken and used to hydrolyze urea in a reporter solution that contains a pH-sensitive dye. The final outcome of this procedure is a color change that can be conveniently reported by the dye or pH paper.
1. Preparation of Reagents and Buffers
2. Synthesis and Purification of E. coli-responsive DNAzyme EC1
3. Conjugation of Urease to DNA
4. Assembly of EC1 and UrDNA onto Magnetic Beads
5. Preparation of Bacterial Cells20
6. Litmus Test
The principle of the bacterial litmus test is explained in Figure 1. The test uses three key materials: an RNA-cleaving DNAzyme that is activated by a specific bacterium, urease and magnetic beads. The DNAzyme is used as the molecular recognition element to achieve highly specific detection of a bacterium of interest. Urease and magnetic beads are used to achieve signal transduction of the RNA-cleavage activity of the DNAzyme. This involves the creation of magnetic beads that contain urease-DNAzyme conjugates. In the presence of the target bacterium, the DNAzyme cleaves its RNA linkage. This action gives rise to the dissociation of urease from magnetic beads. The released urease can be easily separated from magnetic beads and used to generate a color change in a reporter solution, which contains urea and a pH-sensitive dye. Urease hydrolyzes urea into ammonia, accompanied by the increase of pH that triggers the color change of the dye.
Figure 2 presents a bacterial litmus test where EC1, an E. coli-responsive RNA-cleaving DNAzyme, was used as the DNAzyme, and phenol red was used as the pH-reporting dye. EC1 was previously isolated by our group from a random-sequence DNA pool using the technique of in vitro selection.5 Our previous studies have shown that EC1 is highly specific for E. coli and exhibits minimal activity towards other bacteria.5,19 It has been found that EC1 is activated by a protein molecule from E. coli. Although the identity of this protein biomarker has not been deciphered, the high recognition specificity suggests that this protein is unique to E. coli. The reporter solution is set up to have an initial pH of 5.5. At this pH, phenol red exhibits a yellow color. As urease hydrolyzes urea into ammonia, the basicity of the reporter solution increases. This is reflected by the gradual change of color from yellow to pink. The depth of color change is dependent on the following two parameters, as illustrated by Figure 2: the number of E. coli cells used in the DNAzyme activation step and the time allowed for the urea hydrolysis step. More E. coli cells resulted in stronger color changes, reflected by the observation of a progressive yellow-to-pink color transition when E. coli cells were serially increased from 5 to 5 x 107 (10-fold increase each time). Meanwhile, a longer time for urea hydrolysis allowed for the detection of smaller numbers of E. coli cells (5,000 cells in the 1 hr reaction and 500 cells in the 2-hour reaction).
The pH change of the bacterial litmus test can also be monitored using a handheld pH meter and representative results are illustrated in Figure 3. It was found that the presence of 107 E. coli cells resulted in gradual increase of pH by 3 units within 10 min. In contrast, the absence of E. coli cells did not cause detectable pH changes under the same setting.
Figure 1: The design principle of bacterial litmus test. (A) Activation of an RNA-cleaving DNAzyme by a specific biomarker from a bacterium of interest. In the presence of the biomarker, the RNA-cleaving DNAzyme immobilized on magnetic beads cleaves the RNA linkage, resulting in the release of the tagged urease from magnetic beads to solution. (B) Three-step assay procedure. Step 1: DNAzyme activation, as described in panel A. Step 2: Magnetic separation — the released urease is separated from magnetic beads. Step 3: Urea hydrolysis — the released urease is added into a urea-containing reporter solution. Urease hydrolyzes urea into ammonia, resulting in a change in pH that can be reported by a pH-sensitive dye. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Litmus test with E. coli using E. coli-responsive DNAzyme EC1. Representative color-changing results with varying numbers of E. coli cells provided above each test-tube. Phenol red was used as the pH-sensitive dye. A test without E. coli was used as a negative control. More E. coli cells are expected to cause the release of more urease molecules, accompanied by stronger color changes. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Monitoring pH increase using a pH meter. The change of pH caused by 107 E. coli cells was monitored using a portable pH meter. A test without E. coli was used as a negative control. The presence of 107 E. coli cells in the test solution can increase the basicity by ~3 pH units in 10 min. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Name | Sequence (5'-3') | Note |
BS1 | BTTTT TTTTT TTTAC TCTTC CTAGC FRQGG TTCGA TCAAG A | B: 5'-Biotin; R: adenine ribonucleotide; F: fluorescein-dT; Q: dabcyl-dT |
DE1 | GATGT GCGTT GTCGA GACCT GCGAC CGGAA CACTA CACTG TGTGG GGATG GATTT CTTTA CAGTT GTGTG TTGAA CGCTG TGTCA AAAAA AAAA | |
T1 | GACAA CGCAC ATCTC TTGAT CGAAC C | |
LD1 | XTTTT TTTTT TTTTT TTGAC ACAGC GTTCA A | X: 5'-NH2 |
Table 1: Sequences of synthetic oligonucleotides.
The translation of the action of the RNA cleavage activity of a bacterium-responsive DNAzyme to a litmus test is made possible through the use of urease and magnetic separation, as illustrated by Figure 1. Although the demonstration of the modified litmus test for bacterial detection is done with an E. coli-dependent RNA-cleaving DNAzyme,5,19,20 the design can be generally extended for any RNA-cleaving DNAzyme. Given the great availability of RNA-cleaving DNAzymes for different analytes and various methodologies to isolate new RNA-cleaving DNAzymes from random-sequence pools for new targets, we expect that the modified litmus test platform can be extended to the detection of diverse targets of interest.
The litmus test for E. coli detection can detect 5,000 and 500 cells when the reporting reaction time is set to be 1 and 2 hr, respectively. The popular polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods can achieve detection limits of approximately 104-105 E. coli cells in similar testing times.25,26 Thus, the bacterial litmus test offers comparable detection sensitivity.
Although the bacterial litmus test is easy to carry out and can produce vibrant color changes, several factors can significantly affect test results. Firstly, the quality of urease is very important. We have used urease from different sources and found the test results can vary significantly. We recommend the use of urease from the source specified in the Materials section.
The assembly of DNAzyme/urease/magnetic beads needs special attention. Thorough washing of magnetic beads to remove unhybridized UrDNA is necessary to prevent false-positive results. Care also needs to be taken to avoid the accumulation of residual magnetic beads on the inside surface of the lid of the microfuge tube, which may be difficult to see. Once there, the magnetic beads are no longer subjected to magnetic separation and thus, could carry some unhybridized UrDNA that can lead to false-positive signals in the reporter reaction. It is also important to avoid leaving the microfuge tube on the magnetic rack for longer than 10 min during the magnetic separation step. The beads may aggregate or stick to the microfuge tube, which may reduce the washing efficiency and introduce batch-to-batch inconsistency. Inclusion of 0.01% Tween-20 in the washing solution can improve batch-to-batch consistency and should be implemented.
The magnetic beads are coated with streptavidin, which was used as the anchor to assemble DNAzyme-urease conjugates onto the magnetic beads. Both streptavidin and urease are protein molecules that can be denatured during storage. We typically store the assembled DNAzyme-urease-magnetic beads at 4 °C for up to 4 weeks and make fresh batches regularly to achieve more consistent results.
Care also needs to be taken to avoid accidently taking magnetic beads in the magnetic separation step (step 6.9) following DNAzyme activation. From our experience, cellular debris and other particulates in the solution can reduce the magnetic separation efficiency, and therefore, some magnetic beads may be unintentionally taken out during pipetting. This will result in false-positive results. We recommend the following measures to alleviate the problem: a longer separation time (such as 5-10 min), a slower release of pressure on the pipette to allow gentle withdrawal of the supernatant, and subjecting the supernatant to an additional round of magnetic separation.
Finally, it is important to avoid accident contamination of the reporter stock solution by urease during the course of an experiment where multiple samples are tested. Given the high reactivity of urease, contamination of this nature can lead to false-positive results.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The funding for this research project was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) via a Discovery Grant to YL.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) | VWR AMRESCO | 0105 | |
Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH) pellets | BIO BASIC CANADA INC. | SB6789 | |
Tris-base | VWR AMRESCO | 0497 | |
Boric acid | AMRESCO | 0588 | |
Urea | VWR AMRESCO | M123 | |
40% acrylamide/bisacrylamide (29:1) solution | BIO BASIC CANADA INC. | A0007 | |
Sucrose | Bioshop Canada inc. | SUC507 | |
Bromophenol blue | Bioshop Canada inc. | BRO777 | |
Xylenecyanol FF | SIGMA-ALDRICH | X-4126 | |
10% sodium dodecyl sulfate | Bioshop Canada inc. | SDS001 | |
Hydrochloric Acid (HCl) | CALEDON LABORATORIES LTD | 6026 | |
Sodium Chloride (NaCl) | Bioshop Canada inc. | SOD001 | |
4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) | Bioshop Canada inc. | HEP001 | |
Magnesium Chloride (II) hexahydrate | VWR AMRESCO | 0288 | |
Tween 20 | Bioshop Canada inc. | TW508 | |
Adenosine Triphospahte (ATP) | AMRESCO | 0220 | |
Sodium Acetate trihydrate (NaOAc) | SIGMA-ALDRICH | S8625 | |
Ethanol | Commercial Alcohols | P016EAAN | |
Tetramethyleneethylenediamine (TEMED) | AMRESCO | 0761 | |
10% Ammonium persulfate (APS) | BIO BASIC CANADA INC. | AB0072 | |
Succinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl) cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (SMCC) | ThermoFisher SCIENTIFIC | 22360 | |
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) | CALEDON LABORATORIES | 803540 | |
Urease | SIGMA-ALDRICH | U0251 | |
1x Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) | ThermoFisher SCIENTIFIC | 70011-069 | |
0.04% Phenol red | SIGMA-ALDRICH | P3532 | |
10x T4 polynucleotide kinase reaction buffer | Lucigen | 30061-1 | |
10x T4 DNA ligase reaction buffer | Bio Basics Canada | B1122-B | |
T4 DNA ligase (5 U/μl) | Thermo Fischer Scientific | B1122 | |
Luria Bertani (LB) Broth | AMRESCO | J106 | |
Agar | AMRESCO | J637 | |
T4 polynucleotide kinase (10 U/μl) | Lucigen | 30061-1 | |
E. coli K12 (MG1655) | ATCC | ATCC700926 | |
Centrifuge | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | 392187 | |
Glass plates | CBS scientific | ngp-250nr | |
0.75 mm thick spacers | CBS scientific | VGS-0725r | |
12-well comb | CBS scientific | VGC-7512 | |
UV Lamp | UVP | 95-0017-09 | |
Spectrophotometer (NanoVue) | GE Healthcare | N/A | |
Metal plate | CBS scientific | CPA165-250 | |
Vortex | VWR International | 58816-123 | |
Gel electrophoresis apparatus | CBS scientific | ASG-250 | |
Petri dishes | VWR International | 25384-342 | |
100 kDa MWCO centrifugal filters | EMD Millipore | UFC510024 | |
Magnetic Bead (BioMag) | Bangs Laboratories Inc | BM568 | |
Magnetic Seperation Rack | New England BioLabs | S1506S | |
Microfuge tubes | Sarstedt | 72.69 | |
Syringe filter (0.22 μm) | VWR International | 28145-501 | |
14 ml culture tube | VWR International | 60818-725 | |
Cell culture incubator | Eppendorf Scientific | M13520000 | |
Branson Ultrasonic cleaner | Branson | N/A | |
Camera (Canon Powershot G11) | Canon | N/A | |
50 ml conical tube | VWR International | 89004-364 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved