JoVE Logo

Zaloguj się

W tym Artykule

  • Podsumowanie
  • Streszczenie
  • Wprowadzenie
  • Protokół
  • Wyniki
  • Dyskusje
  • Ujawnienia
  • Podziękowania
  • Materiały
  • Odniesienia
  • Przedruki i uprawnienia

Podsumowanie

This study describes a method for producing chondrocytic spheroids by aggregating cells into spheroids under low-adhesion conditions using gravity, followed by culturing the resulting spheroids in mini-bioreactors.

Streszczenie

Cartilage repair in chronic joint diseases demands advanced cell-based therapies to regenerate damaged tissues effectively. This protocol provides a step-by-step method for differentiating induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) into chondrocyte-based spheroids, supporting tissue engineering and cell therapy applications. The differentiation process is carefully structured to promote chondrogenic lineage commitment, beginning with iPSCs cultured in specific media that sequentially guide cells through critical stages of differentiation. Initially, iPSCs are expanded to reach optimal confluency before induction toward chondrogenic lineage using a series of defined media changes. By day 10, cells are transitioned to a chondrogenesis-promoting medium that enhances the formation of chondrocyte-like cells expressing key markers of mature chondrocytes. Further aggregation in 96-well agarose-coated plates leads to the formation of three-dimensional spheroids, which are then cultured in custom mini-bioreactors designed to simulate a microenvironment that encourages extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition. By enabling scalable production of chondrocyte spheroids that mimic native cartilage characteristics, this approach offers a promising, reproducible solution for developing cell-based treatments for cartilage defects, providing broad utility for clinical and research applications in musculoskeletal regenerative medicine.

Wprowadzenie

The prevalence of joint disease leads to significant economic burdens due to the increasing number of disabled patients and the costs associated with their care. Hyaline cartilage is a connective avascular tissue with limited regenerative potential1. Prolonged use of certain non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), glucocorticoids, and chemotherapy or radiotherapy can further diminish cartilage's regenerative capacity, nearly eliminating its ability to heal2. This makes it challenging to obtain autologous cartilage cells for cellular therapy.

The technology of three-dimensional (3D) cell cultivation, including chondrocytes, has long been recognized as an emerging research area with significant potential. These 3D structures are being studied for applications in both fundamental biological research and regenerative medicine. Spheroids derived from autologous chondrocytes hold therapeutic promise for addressing cartilage tissue degeneration, a condition currently receiving considerable global attention3.

Spheroids derived from chondrocytes differentiated from iPSCs represent a promising alternative to primary chondrocytes, offering significant advantages for cartilage repair. iPSCs provide an almost limitless capacity for self-renewal and possess a broad differentiation potential, which allows for the production of chondrocytes in quantities sufficient for clinical applications without invasive procedures for cell collection4. Moreover, transitioning from traditional two-dimensional (2D) chondrocyte cultures to 3D culture systems, such as chondrospheres, further enhances the viability and functionality of these cells by creating a more physiologically relevant environment. Studies show that chondrocytes cultured in 3D spheroids better maintain their phenotype, displaying lower rates of dedifferentiation and higher expression levels of key hyaline cartilage markers, such as collagen type II and aggrecan5.

Despite the potential of iPSC-derived chondrospheres, standardized protocols for generating high-quality chondrospheres remain limited. Variability in protocols across studies often leads to inconsistencies in chondrocyte quality and extracellular matrix composition, affecting their effectiveness for therapeutic use6. Here, a refined protocol is presented that standardizes the generation of spheroids from iPSC-derived chondrocytes using affordable, custom-made mini-bioreactors. The mini-bioreactor culture phase is essential, as it provides a controlled, low-adhesion setting that optimizes nutrient distribution, ECM maturation, and spheroid compaction7. This phase promotes robust expression of essential chondrocyte markers, including collagen type II, aggrecan, and SOX9, along with an ECM composition that closely resembles native cartilage. Regular media changes and careful control of environmental conditions -- temperature, CO2, and rotation speed -- further ensure the viability and maturation of the chondrocyte spheroids. This protocol has been optimized to create high-quality chondrospheres with strong expression of hyaline cartilage markers in a cost-effective and scalable manner, suitable for research and clinical applications in cartilage repair.

Protokół

​The study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the LOPUKHIN FRCC PCM (protocol No. 2019/02 of April 9, 2019). All donor samples were obtained in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants and/or their legal guardians.

NOTE: Maintain sterile technique throughout the protocol. Warm all culture media and solutions to 37 °C before applying them to cells or spheroids. Cultivate cells in a CO2 incubator at 37 °C, with 5% CO2 upon 80% humidity. The protocol scheme is shown in Figure 1.

figure-protocol-755
Figure 1: Protocol for producing chondrospheres from iPSC line IPSRG4S. (A) Initially, iPSCs are cultured in pluripotent stem cell media until 80% confluency is reached. (B) To induce differentiation towards the chondrocytic linage, iPSCs are then cultured in medium A for 2 days. The medium is subsequently replaced with a formulation lacking Chir 99021 and Rho kinase inhibitor, and cells are cultured for an additional 6 days with medium changes every 2 days. (C) The cells are then transferred to medium B to promote chondrogenesis for the next 10 days. (D) Once a sufficient cell number is achieved, the process advances to the spheroids production stage. (E) The cells are aggregated into spheroids in low-adhesive conditions under gravity. (F) The resulting spheroids are cultured in mini-bioreactors with medium B. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

1. Transformation of Petri dishes into mini-bioreactors

NOTE: Details in a previous article5.

  1. Slice centrifuge tubes into 7-8 mm high rings using sterile autoclave scissors (autoclave settings: 121 °C (250 °F) at 15 psi, 30 min, and post-autoclave drying for 20 min).
  2. Crush low-adhesion, untreated, or microbiological Petri dishes into small pieces. Dissolve approximately 1 g of plastic particles in 10 mL of chloroform overnight to create a liquid plastic solution. Conduct this procedure in a fume hood.
  3. Verify that the liquid plastic is sufficiently viscous for pipetting. Ensure that droplets maintain a spherical shape rather than spreading on the surface. If the solution is too thin, add more plastic particles, usually requiring 1-3 g. If it is too thick, add additional chloroform, usually requiring up to 5 mL.
  4. Form a plastic knob at the center of a sterile, ultra-low adhesion 60 mm Petri dish using one of the two effective methods outlined below.
    1. Option 1: Place the autoclaved plastic ring in the center of the Petri dish, then apply liquid plastic inside the ring; one drop will require about 100-200 µL drops of liquid plastic.
    2. Option 2: Apply the same number of drops of liquid plastic directly into the center of the Petri dish without using the plastic ring.
  5. Allow the dishes to dry uncovered for 2-3 h in a laminar flow hood. After drying, expose the dishes to ultraviolet radiation for 20-30 min.

2. Treatment of culture dishes with gelatin

  1. Prepare a 0.1% gelatin solution by dissolving powdered gelatin in distilled water at 95 °C. Pass the solution sequentially through 0.45 µm and 0.25 µm membrane filters, then store the filtrate at 4 °C.
  2. Immediately before chondrocyte reseeding, apply the 3 mL of gelatin solution to the 25 cm2 flask (up to 15 g of cartilage tissue per T25 flask is recommended). Incubate at room temperature (RT) for 30 min,remove the gelatin, rinse twice with PBS, and proceed with cell seeding.

3. Isolation and cultivation of chondrocytes

NOTE: Chondrocytes are isolated from non-weight-bearing cartilage regions from patients undergoing total knee replacement. Harvest all specimens under sterile conditions and store them in sterile tubes filled with DMEM containing 200 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin solution. Store cartilage tissue in a refrigerator at 2-8 °C.

  1. Begin enzymatic treatment within 2 days of cartilage harvest. Wash cartilage pieces in Hanks' solutionusing 60 mm Petri dishes, then cut cartilage into fragments of approximately 1-2 mm in diameter using autoclaved scissors.
  2. Transfer cartilage pieces into 15 mL tubes and digest them in 0.01% collagenase type II solution in DMEM, approximately 1 mL per 1 g of cartilage, within 8-12 h in a CO2 incubator set to 37 °C with 5% CO2, 100% humidity, under continuous agitation on an orbital shaker at 150-200 rpm.
  3. After digestion, wash the cartilage fragments by adding DMEM to a 15 mL tube, then centrifuge at 300 × g for 10 min. Resuspend the fragments in a chondrocyte culture medium (Supplementary Table 1) and seed them onto an adhesive T25 flask pre-coated with 0.1% gelatin solution.
  4. Passage chondrocytes when a confluent density of 80% is achieved.
    1. For passaging, wash chondrocytes with Hanks' solution, then incubate cells with 0.25% trypsin solution at 37 °C for 5 min.
    2. To inactivate trypsin, add an equal volume of DMEM + 10% FBS. Resuspend chondrocytes in fresh culture medium, then distribute them at a 1:3 ratio, seeding 20,000-30,000 cells per 1 cm2.
    3. Place the culture flask in an incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2 and 100% humidity.

4. Cultivation of pluripotent stem cells

NOTE: In collaboration with the Stem Cell Laboratory of the Molecular Brain Research Group, Department of Neurobiology, A.I. Virtanen Institute, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland, an iPSCs line IPSRG4S, was successfully generated in a previous study8.

  1. Cultivate iPSCs in 6-well plates pre-coated with a matrix containing extracellular proteins ( Figure 1A). Use a medium for pluripotent stem cells (Supplementary Table 1).
  2. Passage cells at 80% confluency, maintaining a 1:4 ratio (50,000-75,000 cells per 1 cm2). Approximately 2-3 h before detachment, transfer iPSCs to the medium for pluripotent stem cells containing Rho kinase inhibitor Y27632 at a final concentration 1 µM for 1 day.
  3. Wash iPSCs with Hanks' solution and incubate at 37 °C with 0.05% trypsin solution. To inactivate trypsin, add an equal volume of DMEM + 10% FBS. Centrifuge the cell suspension at 200 x g for 5 min in 15 mL tubes.
  4. Discard the supernatant and resuspend the cells in a fresh medium for pluripotent stem cells. To enhance cell viability, add Rho kinase inhibitor Y27632 to the medium at a final concentration of 1 µM for 1 day. Place the culture plate in a CO2 incubator set to 37 °C with 5% CO2 and 100% humidity.

5. Chondrogenic differentiation of iPSCs

  1. Initiate differentiation towards the chondrocytic lineage by culturing cells in Medium A (Supplementary Table 1) for the first 2 days. On day 3, replace Medium A with a solution that excludes Chir 99021 and Rho kinase inhibitor while keeping all other components unchanged. Change the medium every 2 days from days 3 to 9 (Figure 1B).
  2. On day 10, transfer chondrocyte-like cells to Medium B (Supplementary Table 1), formulated to facilitate chondrogenesis. Change the medium every 2 days for 10 days (Figure 1C).
  3. Prepare a 96-well cell suspension culture plate in advance by coating each well with 1.5% agarose in distilled water. Melt the agarose in a microwave until boiling (about 60-90 s at 700 W). Once agarose is liquefied, add 75 µL of agarose to each well and allow it to harden at RT (approximately 15 min).
  4. Add 150 µL of DMEM medium to each well and incubate the plate in a CO2 incubator for at least 12 h.
    NOTE: Prepared plates can be stored for up to 1 month in a CO2 incubator at 37 °C if the medium in each well is replenished to compensate for evaporation.
  5. On day 12, after observing phenotypical changes associated with chondrogenesis, initiate spheroids formation using the generated chondrocyte-like cells.
    NOTE: At this stage, it is advisable to analyze the expression of key chondrocytic markers with immunocytochemistry (ICC) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) using the 2-ΔΔCT method9 to confirm successful chondrogenic differentiation of iPSCs. During passaging from 6-well plate to a 75 cm2 cell culture flask, a small portion of cells can be seeded into a 48-well plate, matching the number of markers to be analyzed. Perform ICC analysis on these samples to verify gene expression.

6. Formation of spheroids from chondrocyte-like iPSC-derived cells

  1. After obtaining chondrocyte-like derivatives, passage cells at 80% confluency. Detach cells from the 6-well plates using a 0.05% trypsin solution. To inactivate trypsin, add an equal volume of DMEM + 10% FBS, and then transfer cells to a 15 mL tube and centrifuge at 200 x g for 5 min.
  2. Remove the supernatant, resuspend the cells in 1 mL of Medium B, and transfer to a 75 cm2 cell culture flask pre-coated with 0.1% gelatin solution (Figure 1D). Once cells reach 80% confluency as a monolayer, detach cells again with trypsin and resuspend in Medium B as described.
  3. Transfer cells into a 96-well plate coated with 1.5% agarose at a density of 100,000 cells per well. Cultivate in Medium B, adding 150 µL of complete medium per well (Figure 1D, 3A).
  4. Maintain cells in the 96-well plate coated with 1.5% agarose for a minimum of 1 day and a maximum of 3 days until spheroids are formed (Figure 2B). Transfer spheroids from the wells using a 1 mL pipette tip with a trimmed end, then transfer to a 15 mL tube. Allow spheroids to settle for 2-3 min and remove the supernatant.
  5. Immerse the spheroids in freshly thawed, undiluted basement membrane matrix solution maintained at 4 °C. After 30 min, collect spheroids by passive sedimentation in a 15 mL tube or by gentle centrifugation at 100 x g for 1 min.
    NOTE: Matrix should be thawed overnight on ice in a 2-8 °C refrigerator. After the first thaw, single-use aliquots of the matrix are made to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Polypropylene or other freezer-compatible tubes are used and stored at -70 °C or -20 °C. Be watchful of the expiration date of the batch/lot, which is 2 years from the manufacture date.
  6. Transfer spheroids into mini-bioreactors and add 6 mL of Medium B. Place the mini-bioreactor on an orbital shaker inside a CO2 incubator set to 37 °C with 5% CO2 and 100% humidity and an agitation speed of 70-75 rpm (Figure 1F).
  7. Change the medium weekly or as required by medium depletion or color change of the acid-base indicator. To do this, allow spheroids to settle by gravity in a 15 mL tube, and then carefully remove the supernatant. Add fresh Medium B to the tube, and transfer spheroids back to the mini-bioreactors.

Wyniki

The outlined protocol is illustrated in Figure 1. This methodology employs two distinct culture media to drive the differentiation of iPSCs into chondrocyte spheroids over a minimum duration of 1 month (Figure 2). The differentiation process is initiated when iPSCs achieve 75%-90% confluency (Figure 1B). Early indicators of chondrogenic differentiation emerge around days 9-10 of cultivation in medium A, marked by the cells adopting a morphology characteristic of chondrocytes. On day 10, the cells are transferred to medium B (Figure 1C) and cultured until differentiation is complete by day 19 (Figure 3). At this stage, 99% of the cells were positive for chondrogenic markers - Aggrecan (ACAN), Collagen type I (COL1A2), collagen type II (COL2A1), SOX9 and show no expression of pluripotent cell markers TRA-1-81 and OCT4. It is worth noting that a high level of expression of key chondrocytic markers is not always observed in all cases. Chondrospheres with at least 90%-95% gene marker expression are considered high quality; therefore, additional gene expression analysis in spheroid samples, for instance, on day 30 of iPSC differentiation, is recommended (Figure 4 and Figure 5).

figure-results-1520
Figure 2: Process of spheroid formation in the wells of a 96-well plate. (A)The initial stage of IPSRG4S chondrocytic spheroid formation; (B) Formed IPSRG4S chondrocytic spheroid on day 2 of cultivation under low-adhesive, gravity conditions. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

figure-results-2163
Figure 3: Immunohistochemical analysis of chondrocytes obtained from various sources. (A-L) Chondrocyte derivatives from iPSCs obtained by day 19 from the start of differentiation display similar expression levels of key chondrocyte marker genes (ACAN, E; COL2A1, G; SOX9, H) when compared to native chondrocyte cultures at passage 2 (ACAN, A; COL2A1, C; SOX9, D). The iPSCs culture served as a negative control (ACAN, I; COL1A1, J; COL2A1, K; SOX9, L). Expression of type I collagen is also comparable between native chondrocytes (COL1A1, B) and iPSCs-derived chondrocyte samples (COL1A1, F). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

The process next focused on determining the optimal number of chondrocyte-like iPSC derivatives required for spheroid generation (based on the calculation that each well in 96-well plate needs 100,000 cells to produce a single spheroid). This preparation phase took approximately 1 week to complete (Figure 1D). In contrast, generating spheroids from native chondrocytes only involves obtaining the optimal number of chondrocytes before directly proceeding to the spheroid production step.

In the subsequent stage, cells were collected using an ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-containing solution, and 100,000 cells were seeded into each well of a 96-well, U-bottom culture plate pre-coated with 1.5% agarose (Figure 1E). The cells were then incubated in medium B for 12 h to 48 h to promote spheroid formation. Each well supported the aggregation of cells into a single spheroid. Once the spheroids had formed, they were coated with freshly thawed extracellular matrix and transferred to homemade mini-bioreactors containing medium B (Figure 1F). These bioreactors were placed on an orbital shaker rotating at 70-75 rpm. The spheroids matured into chondrospheres with uniform growth and consistent morphogenesis across all samples.

Chondrospheres have limited proliferative potential, primarily expanding in size during the initial month, with the production of extracellular matrix proteins driving this growth. After 2 months of cultivation, the maximum diameter reached was 3-4 mm, with chondrospheres typically exhibiting a diameter of 1-2 mm (Figure 4E,J).

Larger organoids exhibited a loose central zone, often accompanied by cavities or necrotic areas. Organoids that are 1-month-old expressed chondrocyte markers, including aggrecan, collagen type II, and SOX9 (Figure 4 and Figure 5). The optimal cultivation duration of high-quality chondrospheres was approximately 1 month.

figure-results-5593
Figure 4: Immunohistochemical analysis of spheroids generated from chondrocytes of various sources. (A-J) ICC analysis was conducted on day 30 from the start of differentiation when spheroids were cultured in mini-bioreactors. The expression of aggrecan and type 2 collagen in spheroids from native chondrocytes (ACAN, A; COL2A1, C) and of iPSCs-derived chondrocytic spheroids (ACAN, F; COL2A1, H) is at similar levels. However, spheroids chondrocytic spheroids derived from iPSCs (COL1A1, G, SOX9, I), compared to native chondrocytes (COL1A1, B; SOX9, D), are characterized by higher expression levels of collagen type 1 and SOX9. The morphology of spheroids derived from native chondrocytes (E) and chondrocytic spheroids derived from iPSCs (J) during mini-bioreactor cultivation is also shown. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

figure-results-6897
Figure 5: qPCR analysis of expression levels of key chondrogenic markers in spheroids. This analysis of the expression level of chondrocytic genes in chondrospheres generated from native chondrocytes and chondrocytic derivatives of iPSCs confirms the results presented above. The graphs indicate the statistical significance of differences by Tukey's test - **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

It is important to note that during the differentiation of iPSCs into chondrocytic lineage, the final culture of chondrospheres is more similar to juvenile cartilage, characterized by greater elasticity compared to hyaline cartilage. This contrasts with spheroids obtained from native chondrocytes. The presence of a mixed chondrocyte phenotype within the spheroid, combining hyaline and fibrous tissue, contributes to this difference.

Supplementary Table 1: Composition of media. Please click here to download this table.

Dyskusje

iPSCs represent a transformative tool in regenerative medicine, offering the potential to generate patient-specific chondrocytes for cartilage repair. Current protocols leverage directed differentiation through mesodermal pathways, with key signaling molecules like TGF-β and BMP-2 promoting chondrocytic lineage commitment. These methods aim to replicate embryonic cartilage development, enabling the production of extracellular matrix components such as collagen type II and aggrecan, essential for functional cartilage tissue. Advancements in 3D culturing techniques, including pellet and suspension cultures, have enhanced the ability to maintain a stable chondrocytic phenotype while reducing dedifferentiation10,11.

Bioreactors provide several key advantages for cultivating chondrocyte spheroids compared to other systems12. Bioreactors effectively facilitate the growth of 3D spheroids by mimicking in vivo conditions. They enable the development of spatially distributed cell-matrix and cell-cell interactions that are essential for the functional properties of cartilage tissue. Also, bioreactors can be tailored to provide a controlled microenvironment, including parameters such as oxygen transfer rates, nutrient flow, and shear stress, which are critical for maintaining chondrocyte differentiation and extracellular matrix production13.

Mini bioreactors are significantly more affordable than commercially available bioreactors. They utilize readily available materials and simpler assembly processes, making them accessible for laboratories with limited funding, like classical bioreactors. Mini-bioreactors are well-suited for small-scale, high-throughput studies, which allow researchers to simultaneously test multiple variables such as different culture media, growth factors, or differentiation protocols.

Using homemade mini-bioreactors ensures that each organoid is exposed to a consistent environment, reducing risks of crowding or unwanted adhesion. The quality and maturation stage of cells is essential for protocol success, with chondrogenic differentiation requiring a confluence of 75%-90% for iPSCs14. If the seeding density is too low, iPSC differentiation into non-chondrogenic cell types may occur. During differentiation, a regular supply of fresh medium to cells and spheroids is essential, as nutrient depletion can significantly compromise organoid quality.

Certain modifications to the protocol may be allowed as long as they do not alter the fundamental principles of the procedure. Inert materials such as fluoroplastic, polyethylene, or polypropylene can be used to create a knob in the center of the mini-bioreactor. If using a microbiological Petri dish to prepare the liquid plastic, subject the resulting mini-bioreactors to cytotoxicity testing to verify their suitability for chondrocyte culture. Petri dishes of various diameters can also serve as mini-bioreactor bases; however, rotation speed must be adjusted accordingly, as optimal speeds depend on medium volume. For example, for 8 mL of medium in a 6 cm Petri dish, the ideal rotation speed is 70-75 rpm.

Increased expression of the COL1A2 gene was observed in iPSC-derived chondrocyte spheroids compared to spheroids formed from native chondrocytes, indicating the presence of cells with a mixed phenotype (Figure 5). This mixed gene expression suggests a hybrid tissue structure, encompassing features of both hyaline and fibrous cartilage. Such a structure may be advantageous, as it could increase tissue resilience, although other studies suggest that serum components may promote type I collagen synthesis, contributing to fibrotic effects15.

The protocol specifies replacing the medium every 5-7 days throughout the month-long maturation of spheroids in mini-bioreactors, emphasizing the critical importance of rigorous sterile practices. To mitigate the risk of mycoplasma contamination, a prophylactic dose of antimicrobials may be incorporated. Homemade mini-bioreactors present distinct benefits over commercial alternatives, notably in terms of affordability, ease of access, and compact design. Their compact nature allows multiple units to be conveniently maintained on a single orbital shaker within an incubator. In contrast, accommodating a comparable number of stirred mini-bioreactors in an incubator often proves logistically challenging.

Ujawnienia

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Podziękowania

The research was supported with allocation #22-15-00250 by the Russian Science Foundation.

Materiały

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
0.05% Trypsin solutionThermo Fisher Scientific25300-062
0.25% Trypsin solutionThermo Fisher Scientific25200-072
Advanced DMEM/F12 Eagle's mediumThermo Fisher Scientific12634028
Aggrecan Monoclonal AntibodyInvitrogenAHP0022Host: Mouse; Dilution: 1/500
Ascorbic acidSigmaA454450 μg/mL
B-27 supplementThermo Fisher Scientific175040441x or 2%
Beta-mercaptoethanolServa2862590 mM
BMP2Miltenyi biotec130-110-92210 ng/mL
Chir 99021Miltenyi biotec130-103-92610 μM
COL1A1 (E6A8E) Monoclonal antibodyCellSignalling39952Host: Rabbit; Dilution: 1/800
COL2A1 (M2139) Monoclonal antibodySanta Cruzsc-52658Host: Mouse; Dilution: 1/50
Collagenase type II solution PanEcoP011-20.01%
DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole)Sigma-AldrichD9542-5MG1 μg/mL
DMEM medium w/o glutaminePanEco?420?
Fetal bovine serum Thermo Fisher Scientific1027010610%
Hanks' solution PanEco?020?
Hybris 8 mediumPanEco?780?/?780
Insulin-Transferrin-Selenium solutionPanEco?0651x solution has the following concentrations: Insulin: 10 µg/mL; Transferrin: 5.5 µg/mL; Selenium 5 ng/mL
L-alanyl-L-glutamine Thermo Fisher Scientific350500382 mM
Matrigel MatrixBD354277300 μg/mL
Penicillin-Streptomycin solutionPanEco?063?100 U/mL
Retinoic acidMiltenyi biotec130-117-33910 nM
Rho kinase inhibitor Y27632Miltenyi biotec130-103-922 10 mM
Secondary Antibody Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed, Alexa Fluor 555Thermo Fisher Scientific A21422Host: Goat; Dilution: 1/500
Secondary Antibody Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed, Alexa Fluor Plus 555Thermo Fisher Scientific ?32732Host: Goat; Dilution: 1/500
Sox9 (D8G8H) Monoclonal antibodyCellSignalling82630Host: Rb; Dilution: 1/400
TeSR-1 mediumSTEMCELL technologies85850
TGF-β1 Miltenyi biotec130-095-06710 ng/mL

Odniesienia

  1. Cieza, A., Causey, K., Kamenov, K., Hanson, S. W., Chatterji, S., Vos, T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 396, e10267(2021).
  2. Hua, C., Buttgereit, F., Combe, B. Glucocorticoids in rheumatoid arthritis: Current status and future studies. RMD Open. 6 (1), e000536(2020).
  3. Wang, M., et al. Articular cartilage repair biomaterials: Strategies and applications. Materials Today Bio. 24, e100948(2024).
  4. Lee, N., Bayaraa, O., Zechu, Z., Kim, H. Biomaterials-assisted spheroid engineering for regenerative therapy. BMB Rep. 54 (7), 356-367 (2021).
  5. Eremeev, A., Pikina, A., Ruchko, E., Sidorov, V., Ragozin, A. Fabrication of cartilage tissue substitutes from cells with induced pluripotency. Med Extrem Situat. 4, 30-41 (2022).
  6. Rodríguez Ruiz, A., et al. Cartilage from human-induced pluripotent stem cells: comparison with neo-cartilage from chondrocytes and bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells. Cell Tissue Res. 386, 309-320 (2021).
  7. Eremeev, A., et al. Brain organoid generation from induced pluripotent stem cells in homemade mini bioreactors. J Vis Exp. 178, e62987(2021).
  8. Holmqvist, S., et al. Creation of a library of induced pluripotent stem cells from Parkinsonian patients. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2, e16009(2016).
  9. Livak, K., Schmittgen, T. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25 (40), 402-408 (2001).
  10. De Kinderen, P., et al. Differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells into chondrocytes: Methods and applications for disease modeling and drug discovery. J Bone Miner Res. 37 (3), 397-410 (2022).
  11. Ali, E., et al. iPSCs chondrogenic differentiation for personalized regenerative medicine: a literature review. Stem Cell Res Ther. 15 (1), 185(2024).
  12. Reina-Mahecha, A., Beers, M., van der Veen, H., Zuhorn, I., van Kooten, T., Sharma, P. A Review of the role of bioreactors for iPSCs-based tissue-engineered articular cartilage. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 20 (7), 1041-1052 (2023).
  13. Fu, L., et al. The application of bioreactors for cartilage tissue engineering: Advances, limitations, and future perspectives. Stem Cells Int. 2021, 6621806(2021).
  14. Castro-Viñuelas, R., et al. Tips and tricks for successfully culturing and adapting human induced pluripotent stem cells. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 23, 569-581 (2021).
  15. Endo, K., Fujita, N., Nakagawa, T., Nishimura, R. Effect of fibroblast growth factor-2 and serum on canine mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis. Tissue Eng Part A. 25 (11-12), 901-910 (2019).

Przedruki i uprawnienia

Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE

Zapytaj o uprawnienia

Przeglądaj więcej artyków

ChondrocytesSpheroidsInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsCartilage RepairCell based TherapiesTissue Engineering3D CultureType One CollagenHighline Cartilage FormationIPSC derived ChondrocytesCellular Material ProductionPhenotype MaintenanceCartilage specific Markers

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Prywatność

Warunki Korzystania

Zasady

Badania

Edukacja

O JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone