Method Article
The following article describes the stepwise procedure for placement of a device (e.g., Tandemheart) in cardiogenic shock (CS) that is a percutaneous left ventricular assist device (pLVAD) and a left atrial to femoral artery bypass (LAFAB) system that bypasses and supports the left ventricle (LV) in CS.
The left atrial to femoral artery bypass (LAFAB) system is a mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device used in cardiogenic shock (CS) that bypasses the left ventricle by draining blood from the left atrium (LA) and returning it to the systemic arterial circulation via the femoral artery. It can provide flows ranging from 2.5-5 L/min depending on the size of the cannula. Here, we discuss the mechanism of action of LAFAB, available clinical data, indications for its use in cardiogenic shock, steps of implantation, post-procedural care, and complications associated with the use of this device and their management.
We also provide a brief video of the procedural component of device therapy, including the pre-placement preparation, percutaneous placement of the device via transseptal puncture under echocardiographic guidance and the post-operative management of device parameters.
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a state of tissue hypoperfusion with or without concomitant hypotension, in which the heart is unable to deliver sufficient blood and oxygen to meet the body's demands, resulting in organ failure. It is classified into stages A to E by the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI): stage A - patients at risk for CS; stage B - patients at beginning stage of CS with hypotension or tachycardia without hypoperfusion; stage C - classic CS with cold and wet phenotype requiring inotropes/vasopressors or mechanical support to maintain perfusion; stage D - deteriorating on current medical or mechanical support requiring escalation to more advanced devices; and stage E - includes patients with circulatory collapse and refractory arrhythmias who are actively experiencing cardiac arrest with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation1. The most common causes of CS are acute MI (AMI) representing 81% of cases in a recently reported analysis2, and acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). CS is classically characterized by congestion and impaired perfusion, manifested by elevated filling pressures (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure [PCWP], left ventricular end-diastolic pressure [LVEDP], central venous pressure [CVP], and right ventricular end-diastolic pressure [RVEDP]), decreased cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), cardiac power output (CPO), and end-organ malfunction3. In the past, the only available treatments for AMI complicated by CS were early revascularization and medical management with inotropes and/or vasopressors4. More recently, with the advent of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices and the recognition that escalation of vasopressors is associated with increased mortality, there has been a paradigm shift in the treatment of both AMI and ADHF related CS5,6.
In the current era of percutaneous ventricular assist devices (pVAD), there are a number of MCS device platforms/configurations available, which provide univentricular or biventricular circulatory and ventricular support with and without oxygenation capability7. Despite steady increases in the use of pVADs to treat both AMI and ADHF CS, mortality rates have remained largely unchanged5. With emerging evidence for possible clinical benefits to early unloading of the left ventricle (LV) in AMI8 and early use of MCS in AMI CS9, the use of MCS continues to increase.
The Left Atrial to Femoral Artery Bypass (LAFAB) MCS device bypasses the LV by draining blood from the left atrium (LA) and returning it to the systemic arterial circulation via the femoral artery (Figure 1). It is supported by an external centrifugal pump that offers 2.5-5.0 liters per minute (L/m) flow (new generation pump, designated as LifeSPARC, capable of up to 8 L/m flow) depending on the size of the cannulas. Once the blood is extracted from the LA via the transseptal venous cannula, it passes through the external centrifugal pump which recirculates the blood back into the patient's body via the arterial cannula placed in the femoral artery.
Figure 1: LAFAB setup. Image courtesy of TandemLife, a wholly owned subsidiary of LivaNova US Inc. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
This procedure and protocol have been approved by the institutional review board and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
1. Patient criteria
2. Placement of the left atrium to femoral artery bypass device
Figure 2: TEE with biplane in the bicaval view showing the SVC to the right, the interatrial septum horizontal in the middle with the left atrium above and the right atrium below, and the IVC towards the left. (A) - Guidewire passing into the SVC. (B) - Sheath passing over the wire into the SVC. (C) - Transseptal needle passing through the sheath. (D) - Transseptal needle tenting the interatrial septum. (E) - Sheath passing through the interatrial septum into the left atrium, after the needle has been withdrawn. Picture courtesy47
SVC – Superior Vena Cava, IVC – Inferior Vena Cava, RA – Right Atrium, LA – Left Atrium
Figure 3: ICE for transeptal access ICE guided trans septal access showing inter-atrial septum and fossa ovalis (FO) in (A), septal tenting as the needle engages in (B), loss of tenting as the needle crosses in (C), transseptal sheath in the left atrium in D. Picture courtesy48 .
RA – Right Atrium, LA – Left Atrium, FO – Foramen Ovale
3. Right Atrium to Pulmonary Artery Bypass (RAPAB) system placement
4. Device removal
NOTE: Once the patient's end organ function has improved and hemodynamics have stayed stable with either LV recovery or advanced therapies such as durable LVAD placement/transplant, the device can be removed.
Complication | Risk factors | Timing of occurrence | Precaution | Management |
Cardiac perforation and tamponade | Inadvertent advancement of needle or dilator or sheath along the posterior free wall of left atrium. | During transseptal puncture, placement of inflow cannula | Accurate assessment of inter-atrial septum on TEE or ICE and optimizing the site and angle of transseptal puncture via angiography and echo. | Immediate pericardiocentesis to relieve tamponade. May need surgical intervention. |
Acute limb ischemia distal to arterial cannulation | Small caliber vessels housing large cannulas, pre-existing peripheral arterial disease | Immediately post procedure | Peripheral angiogram prior to cannulation. | Placement of distal perfusion catheter, vascular surgery assistance in severe cases. |
Hemolysis, retroperitoneal bleeding, vascular complications such as pseudoaneurysm formation. | Higher pump speeds, pump thrombosis, DIC, anticoagulation | Anytime on the pump | Optimize pump speed for every patient individually. Avoid supratherapeutic anticoagulation. | Reducing pump speed, maintaining therapeutic range of anticoagulation. |
Optimal site of arterial access at the femoral head in the common femoral artery. | ||||
Residual atrial septal defect | Multiple attempts for transseptal access | After decannulation | Hemodynamically significant defects can be closed percutaneously. |
Table 1: Complications of LAFAB device33.
Clinical applications of LAFAB device
The technique and feasibility of a percutaneous trans-atrial left ventricular bypass system were first described in the 1960s by Dennis et al.11,12. However transseptal puncture was not initially widely adopted due to complications with the septostomy technique. Over the last decade, with advancements in the field of percutaneous interventions, operators have accumulated experience with atrial septostomy, which has led to a resurgence of the transseptal ventricular assist device or LAFAB device.
From the initial clinical studies conducted in the 1990s, the LAFAB strategy has demonstrated a high level of myocardial preservation with larger decrease in infarct size, and greater LV unloading in AMI CS, as compared to the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP)13.
LAFAB device for cardiogenic shock
The LAFAB circuit is most widely used in the setting of CS, where it has been shown to be safe and effective in augmenting CO14. A 2006 randomized trial comparing the LAFAB device to IABP in CS15 in 42 patients demonstrated that the LAFAB device was more effective in lowering PCWP and improving CI (1.2 ± 0.8 [P < .05 vs baseline]), although mortality did not differ between the two groups. The incidence of severe adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups in this small cohort. Another trial comparing IABP and LAFAB showed significant improvement in cardiac power index with the LAFAB device (0.22 to 0.37 W/m2, p<0.001), but with a trend towards more complications and no mortality benefit in the LAFAB group16. More patients in the LAFAB group experienced significantly higher acute limb ischemia necessitating revascularization (n=7 vs. n=0, P=0.009) and bleeding complications (n=19 vs. n=8, P=0.002). There was also a trend towards increased incidence of disseminated intravascular coagulopathy in the LAFAB group. More recently, Kar et al. published a study of 117 patients who underwent LAFAB implantation for severe CS refractory to IABP and vasopressor therapy18. Eighty patients had ischemic cardiomyopathy, and 37 had non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. There was an immediate improvement in hemodynamics and end organ perfusion in both groups. CI increased from 0.53 L/min·m2 to 3.0 L/min·m2, p<0.001 and PCWP decreased from 31.53 ± 10.2 mmHg to 17.29 ± 10.82 mmHg, p < 0.001). Mortality rates at 1 and 6 months were 40.2% and 45.3% respectively.
Parameter | Pre-implantation IABP | Pre-implantation VAD | P-value | Post-implantation IABP | Post-implantation VAD | P-value |
Cardiac output (L/min) | 3.0 (2.5–4.0) | 3.5 (3.3–4.2) | 0.29 | 3.3 (2.9–4.3) | 4.5 (4.0–5.4) | 0.007 |
CI (L/min/m2) | 1.5 (1.3–2.0) | 1.7 (1.5–2.1) | 0.35 | 1.7 (1.5–2.1) | 2.3 (1.9–2.7) | 0.005 |
Blood pressure mean (mmHg) | 64 (57–74) | 63 (51–70) | 0.50 | 67 (62–84) | 74 (70–84) | 0.38 |
CPI (W/m2) | 0.22 (0.18–0.30) | 0.22 (0.19–0.30) | 0.72 | 0.28 (0.24–0.36) | 0.37 (0.30–0.47) | 0.004 |
SVR (dyn×s×cm−5) | 1440 (1034–1758) | 1049 (852–1284) | 0.16 | 1388 (998–1809) | 1153 (844–1425) | 0.08 |
Heart rate (beats/min) | 122 (92–130) | 113 (107–121) | 0.57 | 115 (90–125) | 105 (100–116) | 0.94 |
PCWP (mmHg) | 27.0 (20.0–30.0) | 20.0 (18.0–23.0) | 0.02 | 21.5 (17.0–26.0) | 16.0 (12.5–19.0) | 0.003 |
Central venous pressure (mmHg) | 13.0 (11.0–16.5) | 11.0 (9.0–15.3) | 0.29 | 12.0 (10.0–17.5) | 10.0 (8.0–12.0) | 0.06 |
PAP mean (mmHg) | 32.5 (27.5–38.0) | 28.0 (24.5–34.8) | 0.45 | 28.5 (25.5–33.5) | 24.5 (20.0–26.0) | 0.007 |
Serum lactate (mmol/L) | 3.8 (3.5–6.7) | 4.5 (3.1–6.5) | 0.53 | 3.25 (2.7–7.0) | 2.8 (2.3–3.5) | 0.03 |
Standard base excess (mmol/L) | −6.8 [−8.3–(−3.9)] | −5.1 [−7.5–(−4.4)] | 0.74 | −4.3 [−8.8–(−2.3)] | −4.3 [−6.1–(−3.3)] | 0.28 |
pH | 7.34 (7.28–7.38) | 7.28 (7.24–7.36) | 0.50 | 7.36 (7.28–7.41) | 7.33 (7.31–7.40) | 0.49 |
Table 2: Table of results for hemodynamic improvement post LAFAB compared with intra-aortic balloon pump. Adapted from Thiele et al.17.
A 10-patient report also demonstrated successful LAFAB device use in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and CS17. In this case series, the LAFAB device was used as a temporizing measure to stabilize hemodynamics and end-organ function prior to definitive valve replacement. Eight patients received it in the cardiac catheterization lab before surgical valve replacement with improved renal function prior to surgery and 2 patients received the device support in the operating room after valve replacement. Overall, 3 patients died17.
LAFAB device as a bridge to transplant/durable VAD
Another important application of the LAFAB device is in end-stage heart failure, where they are used as a bridge to definitive therapy - durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or cardiac transplantation19.
In a series of 25 patients with CS20, 44% of patients underwent placement of durable LVAD of which 30% recovered, and 36% died on support. The mean duration of LAFAB support was 4.8 ± 2.1 days. Fifty six % of patients experienced device-related complications, of which 90% were vascular access complications. Gregoric et al. reported a series of 9 patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy and refractory shock who were bridged with the LAFAB device to a durable LVAD. Eight of these 9 patients were supported with IABP prior to placement of LAFAB device. Mean duration to durable LVAD was 5.9 days. All 9 patients with CS who received the LAFAB device showed improvement in their hemodynamics and end-organ function on LAFAB support before undergoing LVAD implantation21.
In another series of 5 critically ill patients with CS22, the LAFAB device was placed emergently for LV support as a bridge to transplantation. The mean duration of support was 7.6 ± 3.2 days, and all 5 patients underwent cardiac transplantation successfully. No device-related complications were reported in this cohort.
Agarwal et al. in 2015 described a rare, interesting case of durable LVAD thrombosis with CS treated successfully with fibrinolytic therapy and temporary support with LAFAB23.
LAFAB device for high-risk percutaneous interventions
The LAFAB device has been studied and utilized extensively for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (HRPCI)25,26,27,28 with device-related vascular complications within acceptable ranges compared to other comparable devices. In a recent series of 37 patients who underwent LAFAB device placement for CS, 28 patients underwent HRPCI successfully while being supported with the LAFAB device. Seventy one percent of patients in the cohort were successfully discharged home. The mean EuroSCORE was 11 ± 3.4, indicating a high complexity of this critically ill cohort. The authors concluded that the LAFAB device could be used safely and effectively for HRPCI29. In addition to HRPCI, the LAFAB device has also been used for high risk patients undergoing percutaneous aortic valve replacement, as demonstrated in one small series30. Finally, there is also a small 2-patient report of successful LAFAB device use for post-cardiotomy shock31.
Hemodynamics of LAFAB device:
The hemodynamic profile of the LAFAB device is distinct from other pVADs. By draining blood directly from the LA and returning it to the femoral artery, the device bypasses the LV completely. In doing so, it reduces LV end diastolic volume and pressure, contributing to improved LV geometry, and thereby effecting a decrease in LV stroke work. However, by returning the blood back into the iliac artery/descending aorta, afterload increases. This results in loading of the LV via elevated left ventricular end-systolic pressure (LVESP). Overall, the pressure-volume loop narrows and shifts modestly to the left34. The result is a reduction in myocardial workload and decreased oxygen consumption35. The LVEDP and LVESP may be optimized by increasing pump speed, further unloading the LV36.
The advantages of the LAFAB device include decompression of the LV and decreased stroke work, leading to myocardial recovery. LAFAB unloads the LV indirectly by venting the LA (and does not require a separate device for LV unloading). It can provide cardiac support up to 4.5 L/min at the bedside, and its durability has been well established up to 2 weeks in vivo37.
Disadvantages of LAFAB lie in the advanced procedural skills required for device placement, as transseptal puncture is not an ubiquitous cardiac catheterization lab skill. The need for TEE or ICE as well as fluoroscopy limits the use of this device at bedside in emergent situations. Femoral vascular access prevents ambulation and adversely affects patient rehabilitation. As with other MCS, both hemolysis and access site complications may also be significant when they occur. Residual ASD may also occur and adversely affect outcomes in patients bridged to recovery.
Contraindications to LAFAB device:
Absolute contraindications to LAFAB system use include pre-existing VSD, severe AI, LA thrombus, and severe PVD precluding device insertion38.
Right Atrium to Pulmonary Artery Bypass (RAPAB) for right ventricular failure:
Right ventricular (RV) dominant or biventricular CS is fatal with in-hospital mortality rates ranging up to 75%39. Various MCS devices have been successfully used in the management of RV CS. Similar to the LAFAB system, there is also a novel RV support device draining blood from the RA to the PA. It is called the ProtekDuo system (Figure 4), which can provide up to 4 Lpm of flow for the RV40. It consists of a long 31 F (also available in smaller sizes) dual lumen cannula that can be positioned from the internal jugular vein through the RA and RV, into the main PA41. The system is supported by a centrifugal pump similar to the LAFAB system. It empties blood from the RA and returns it to the main PA, bypassing the RV. It may also be connected to an oxygenator for pulmonary support. The RAPAB system helps unload the RV and reduces RV stroke work42. This device is being used increasingly in RV CS43, massive pulmonary embolism44, and postcardiotomy RV failure after LVAD or transplant45. The bulk of the data for RV support comes from the TandemHeart Experiences and Methods (THEME) registry46, where the RAPAB system was used in 30 patients with RV failure of various etiologies, with a 30-day survival of 72.4%, and most patients being bridged to recovery.
Figure 4: Schematic of ProTek Duo system. Image courtesy of TandemLife, a wholly owned subsidiary of LivaNova US Inc. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Use of the LAFAB circuit may provide differential benefit over a transvalvular axial flow pump such as Impella in a number of specific clinical scenarios. As stated previously, the LifeSPARC pump is capable of delivering supraphysiologic levels of flow (up to 8 L/min) with current cannula configurations and thus larger patients and those not adequately supported or fully unloaded on transvalvular axial flow pumps (Impella 2.5 L or CP 4 L) devices may benefit from LAFAB. Secondly, patients with prosthetic aortic valves or unfavorable aortic valve/root anatomy such as those with critical AS or aortic valve endocarditis and patients with LV thrombus may be preferentially considered for LAFAB. Finally, LAFAB may be part of a staged support strategy that began with TandemLife VA-ECMO for acute cardiopulmonary rescue followed by subsequent LA drainage into the circuit, thus effectively providing near-complete biventricular support plus oxygenation.
The LAFAB device is an effective and safe pVAD that can be used in acute or chronic LV failure providing up to 4.5 to 5 Lpm of circulatory support as well as indirect LV unloading via LA decompression. The need for transseptal access may limit the widespread use of this device for emergent LV support in CS. Although observational data suggests both safety and efficacy of the device in both CS and HRPCI, well-conducted large, randomized control trials are needed. In the meantime, results of the ongoing THEME registry may shed more light on the real-world outcomes in patients managed with the LAFAB device.
Sandeep Nathan - Disclosures: Consultant, Abiomed, Getinge, CSI, Inc.
Alexander Truesdell - Disclosures: Consultant, Abiomed Inc.
Poonam Velagapudi - Disclosures: Advisory board for Womens’ Health Initiative, Abiomed
To the TandemHeart team at LifeSparc.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
For LAFAB (TandemHeart) | |||
Factory Supplied Equipment for circuit connections. | TandemLife | ||
ProtekSolo 15 Fr or 17 Fr Arterial Cannula | TandemLife | ||
ProtekSolo 62 cm or 72 cm Transseptal Cannula | TandemLife | ||
TandemHeart Controller | TandemLife | For adjusting flows/RPM | |
TandemHeart Pump | LifeSPARC | Centrifugal pump | |
For RAPAB (ProtekDuo) | |||
Factory Supplied Equipment to complete the circuit. | TandemLife | ||
ProtekDuo 29 Fr or 31 Fr Dual Lumen Cannula | TandemLife | ||
TandemHeart Controller | TandemLife | For adjusting flows/RPM | |
TandemHeart Pump | LifeSPARC | Centrifugal pump |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone