Method Article
* These authors contributed equally
We standardized an abdominal adipose tissue biopsy using a non-diathermy method performed under local anesthesia. Three cases of excessive post-operation bleeding out of 115 operations (2.61%) occurred.We conclude that an abdominal adipose tissue surgical biopsy using a non-diathermy method can be safely applied to healthy men.
Adipose tissue biopsies offer tissue samples that, upon analysis, may provide insightful overviews of mechanisms relating to metabolism and disease. To obtain subcutaneous adipose tissue biopsies in the abdominal area, researchers and physicians use either a surgical or a needle-based technique. However, surgical subcutaneous fat biopsies can offer tissue samples that may provide a more comprehensive overview of the complexities of biological indices in white adipose tissue. Usually, a surgical adipose tissue biopsy includes a diathermy treatment for cauterizing blood vessels to prevent excessive bleeding. Nevertheless, side effects, such as flash fires and skin lesions in the tissue, have been reported after diathermy. Therefore, we aimed to standardize a surgical abdominal adipose tissue biopsy performed under local anesthesia using a non-diathermy method. We conducted 115 subcutaneous adipose tissue biopsies in healthy men using a non-diathermy abdominal surgical biopsy method. Our results showed three cases of excessive post-operation bleeding out of 115 operations (2.61%).In conclusion, our standardized subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue surgical biopsy using a non-diathermy method can be safely applied to healthy men at the bedside, with minimal side effects.
Adipose tissue biopsies offer tissue samples that, upon analysis, may provide an insightful overview of mechanisms relating to metabolism and disease. For instance, they are used for breast cancer tumor identification1, fatty acid composition examination2, and research on important metabolic and hormonal disease pathways3. To obtain subcutaneous adipose tissue biopsies in the abdominal area, researchers and physicians use either a surgical or a needle-based technique. However, surgical subcutaneous fat biopsies can offer tissue samples that may provide a more comprehensive overview of complex biological mechanisms [e.g., messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expression, histological analysis, etc.]4. They have previously been used in healthy adults4 and can be safely performed at the bedside5.
The needle-based biopsy technique requires intense liposuction that may destroy the integrity of the tissue, and it usually retrieves a small amount of tissue (100-500 mg)6. These tissue samples may not be appropriate for complex research studies. Furthermore, compared to the needle-based technique, surgical subcutaneous fat biopsies can offer tissue samples that may draw a more complete picture of several inflammatory indices (e.g., B- and T-cell signaling); cytoskeleton regulation; cellular pathways; metabolic pathways of lipids, carbohydrates and amino acids; and oxidative phosphorylation pathways4. Also, the needle-based technique includes a higher risk for blood cell contamination than the surgical one4, while providing little information about the fibrotic regions of the tissue4,7,8.
Usually, a surgical adipose tissue biopsy includes a diathermy treatment for cauterizing blood vessels to prevent excessive bleeding9. A diathermy is also used to burn and destroy tissues affected by neoplasms and warts or tissues that are infected by disease9. This technique is particularly applicable in neurosurgery and eye surgery9.
The excessive use of diathermy may lead to the formation of necrotic tissue, causing infections and delaying the healing process10. Indeed, side effects such as flash fires and skin lesions in the tissue have been reported following diathermy9. Additionally, concerns have been raised about the toxicity of surgical smoke released by diathermy into the surgery environment, which may be inhaled by the participant/patient and the operating staff9. Indeed, the use of diathermy may cause air toxicity in the operating room equal to that produced by smoking six cigarettes11 and, although operating rooms typically have good ventilation systems, the contamination can last for at least 20 min12. However, in patients undertaking a tonsillectomy surgery, the diathermy method has shown less, but non-significant, post-operative pain13 and bleeding14 than the classic ligation hemostasis method. Overall, evidence regarding differences in the post-operative pain and bleeding rates after adipose tissue biopsies in healthy individuals barely exists. Given the lack of evidence and the side effects of diathermy, standardization of a non-diathermy method for adipose tissue biopsy is warranted. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to standardize a surgical technique for subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue biopsy, performed under local anesthesia using a non-diathermy method in healthy men. Moreover, we outline the procedures for tissue collection to determine mRNA expression and protein concentration and to perform histological analyses.
The study conformed to the standards set by the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the University of Thessaly, Department of Exercise Science, Βiοethics Committee.
1. Preparation of the Surgery Equipment and Consumables
2. Preparation of the Participants
3. Performing the Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Biopsy
4. Deposition of the Tissue
The characteristics of the participants are provided in Table 1. The stitches in the area of the incision fell off within the next 8-12 days. We completed a total of 115 subcutaneous adipose tissue biopsies using the non-diathermy abdominal surgical biopsy method in healthy adult men (age: 35.2 ± 6.9 years; body mass index: 27.3 ± 4.4; and body fat percentage: 27.0 ± 9.0%). Post-biopsy excessive bleeding was observed in three cases (prevalence: 2.61%) two days after the surgery. The three individuals who experienced excessive bleeding were older than their counterparts who experienced no side effects [t(113)= -2.115, p = 0.037], and no other differences (i.e., body mass index and body fat percentage) were observed (p >0.05) between the two groups. Finally, three months after each operation, none of our participants reported any side effects (including skin wounds).
Table 1: Characteristics of the participants.
The aim of this study was to standardize a surgical technique for subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue biopsy, performed under local anesthesia with a non-diathermy method in healthy men. Diathermy is commonly used in the operating room; however, possible side effects (i.e., flash fires and environmental toxicity)9 and delays in healing10 may occur. These unwanted effects of diathermy can generate health risks for both the operating staff and the patients/participants. Therefore, a surgical non-diathermy method for subcutaneous adipose tissue biopsy is warranted.
We observed excessive bleeding in three of our participants two days after the surgery. These three individuals reported pain in the area of the incision. To treat these cases, the area of the skin incision was reopened, any excess blood was removed, and the area was cleaned with saline and closed using the same technique described above. No complications were reported after that, and normal healing was observed in the subsequent days. Our results have shown minimal side effects after the non-diathermy method: three cases of excessive post-operation bleeding out of 115 operations (2.61%). Previous evidence from needle-based adipose tissue biopsies showed minor bleeding in one out of 10 participants 12 h after the surgery15, while no significant bleeding occurred in healthy obese individuals after a side-cutting adipose tissue biopsy needle technique6. Based on our results, we anticipate that a non-diathermy surgical adipose tissue biopsy method may eliminate the risk for skin lesion, flash fires, and toxicity released in the operating environment, which are caused by diathermy during surgical adipose tissue biopsy.
Previous reports have indicated that aging is positively associated with abnormalities in hemostasis20. Interestingly, the three individuals who experienced excessive bleeding in the current study were significantly older (by eight years, on average) than those who did not experience any side effects. Therefore, it may be noted that older individuals have a higher risk for side effects when the non-diathermy surgical adipose tissue biopsy method is applied. However, we believe that the prevalence of such side effects is too low (i.e., 2.61%) to cause any significant concerns. It should be noted that our participants filled in advance a medical history questionnaire to determine their health status. No previous chronic disease conditions were reported by the participants, including the three participants who showed excessive post-operation bleeding. Similarly, no previous chronic medication treatment was reported by both the participants who showed and those who did not show any excessive bleeding. Therefore, the post-operation excessive bleeding we observed in the current study cannot be attributed to previous chronic disease conditions and/or previous chronic medication treatment. In this light, the prevalence of this side effect may be different if the technique is applied to clinical populations.
A critical step during the proposed surgical adipose tissue biopsy is to ensure local anesthesia before the incision, which prevents any pain and discomfort in the participant. Furthermore, a pre-screening of allergic history to the anesthetic must be done to prevent allergic complications during the anesthetic injection. Also, it is crucial to ensure hemostasis before the incision is closed to prevent post-operation bleeding, while it is important to keep in contact with the participants for several days after the procedure is performed until complete healing is achieved to discover any potential abnormalities and to prevent infection and/or cases of post-operation bleeding.
Limitations of the proposed biopsy technique include the discomfort that area of the incision may cause to the participants, particularly relating to their ability to comfortably sit down and take a shower/bath, until complete healing is achieved. The participants should be instructed to avoid washing the area of the incision to prevent infection, as well as to replace the adhesive sterile gauze over the incision area every day until complete healing is achieved. This daily procedure may cause discomfort. Finally, it is important to note that our purpose was to introduce and standardize a new technique. In this light, we did not use a control group undertaking needle-based subcutaneous fat biopsies in order to quantify the differences between this technique and the newly-introduced non-diathermy method.
As previously suggested4,7,8, the proposed surgical biopsy technique may offer tissue samples with higher integrity than the needle-based technique. Indeed, using this technique, we were able to perform mRNA and protein analyses on the obtained tissue and, in addition, to form paraffin cubes for use in histological analyses. Also, we suggest avoiding diathermy in surgical subcutaneous adipose tissue biopsies, given that hemostasis and normal healing can be achieved with our technique.
In conclusion, our standardized subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue surgical biopsy using a non-diathermy method can be safely performed in healthy men at the bedside, with minimal side effects.
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
This work received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 (grant agreement no. 645710) and 7th Framework (grant agreements no. 612547 and 319010) Programmes. The authors wish to thank Dr. Fotini Sourli-Chasioti for the assistance with the biopsy procedure. The authors also thank Mr. Yiorgos Paterakis for his valuable help in the preparation of the video.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Disinfected surgical field | Hartmann | 23516-00 | |
Stainless Steel Instrument Stands (surgical Mayo) | Medical Device Depot Inc. | 32000 | |
Operating Scissors straight 15 cm | Karl Storz | 791903 | |
Scalpel No 11 | Swann-Morton | 203 | Bipolar, catalog number 429011 |
Scarpel handle No 3 | Karl Storz | 488090 | |
Scissors curved 14 cm | Karl Storz | 511514, 752918 | |
Mosquito forceps | Karl Storz | 535012 | |
Tweezers Kocher | Karl Storz | 530416 | Bipolar, catalog number 830316 |
Surgical tweezers | Karl Storz | 793216 | Bipolar, catalog number 831016 |
Povidone-iodine | Various | Not applicable | |
Suture 4.0 Vicryl | Johnsons | V4970H | |
Scissors straight 11 cm | Karl Storz | 512511 DS | |
Needle holder 15 cm | Karl Storz | 515515 | Bipolar, catalog number 213015 |
Sterile gauzes | Hartmann | 3021 | |
Αdhesive sterile gauze | Digas medical equipment | 2889 | |
10 mL syringe with disinfected needle | Alpha medical solutions | 10310-55-0010 | |
2%-xylocaine (no adrenaline) | Various | Not applicable | |
Sterile surgical gloves | Sempermed | 10001 | |
Eppendorf tubes | Kartell | 16283 | |
10% formalin | Alpha medical solutions | 11016-30-2909 | |
Tubes 120 mL | Digas medical equipment | 9025 | |
Liquid nitrogen at -190°C | Revival | Not applicable |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved