Method Article
In situ subcellular fractionation of mammalian cells on microscope coverslips allows the visualisation of protein localisation.
Protein function is intimately coupled to protein localization. Although some proteins are restricted to a specific location or subcellular compartment, many proteins are present as a freely diffusing population in free exchange with a sub-population that is tightly associated with a particular subcellular domain or structure. In situ subcellular fractionation allows the visualization of protein compartmentalization and can also reveal protein sub-populations that localize to specific structures. For example, removal of soluble cytoplasmic proteins and loosely held nuclear proteins can reveal the stable association of some transcription factors with chromatin. Subsequent digestion of DNA can in some cases reveal association with the network of proteins and RNAs that is collectively termed the nuclear scaffold or nuclear matrix.
Here we describe the steps required during the in situ fractionation of adherent and non-adherent mammalian cells on microscope coverslips. Protein visualization can be achieved using specific antibodies or fluorescent fusion proteins and fluorescence microscopy. Antibodies and/or fluorescent dyes that act as markers for specific compartments or structures allow protein localization to be mapped in detail. In situ fractionation can also be combined with western blotting to compare the amounts of protein present in each fraction. This simple biochemical approach can reveal associations that would otherwise remain undetected.
I. Preparation for fractionation
This section describes the preparation of poly-L-Lysine coated microscope coverslips and the attachment of cells prior to fractionation. If required the cells can be transiently transfected with protein expression vectors either before or after attachment.
A. Preparation of poly-L-Lysine coated coverslips
B. Attaching cells to coverslips
Non-adherent cells (here we use K562 cells)
Adherent cells (here we use Cos-7 cells)
II. Subcellular fractionation
In situ fraction is performed according to the schematic shown in Figure 1 and is based on a method described previously5 with modifications described previously7 and in the detailed protocol below. It is recommended to transfer the coverslips to a fresh 6-well plate following each fractionation step removing the coverslip before removing the liquid. Although only four coverslips are required for imaging, additional coverslips are required to produce whole cell extract and nuclear matrix fractions for western blotting if this is to be performed in parallel.
III. Cell fixation and immuno-fluorescence
IV. Representative results
Figure 2. Subcellular fractionation of non-transfected COS-7 cells. Fractionated Cos-7 cells were fixed with formaldehyde and immunostained using α-Tubulin, α-Histone H1 or α-Lamin A/C antibodies conjugated to TRITC followed by treatment with mounting medium containing DAPI. Images were acquired with 10x ocular lens and 63x objective lens using a Leica confocal microscope. Cell nuclei were visualized using a DAPI filter set while in the same field cells stained with marker antibodies were visualized using a TRITC filter set.
Figure 3. A GFP-6E2 fusion protein is associated with the nuclear matrix. Subcellular fractionation of Cos-7 cells expressing a fusion protein consisting of green fluorescent protein (GFP) fused to the human papillomavirus (HPV) type 6 E2 protein (GFP-6E2). Cell nuclei were visualized via DAPI staining while localization of GFP-6E2 in the transfected cells was directly visualized via GFP fluorescence. Lamin A/C was visualized using α-Lamin A/C antibodies conjugated to TRITC and a TRITC filter set. The merge images reveal that some of the GFP-6E2 protein is associated with the nuclear matrix (lower right panel). Images were obtained as described in Figure 2.
Common problems and suggestions:
All or most of the cells are lost during washing. During washing steps liquids must be added slowly to the side of the 6-well plate avoiding the coverslip. Similarly liquids should be removed by carefully tilting the plate and slowly pipetting off excess fluid. Cell adhesion can be increased using poly-L-Lysine coated coverslips.
Genomic DNA is not completely digested. For some cell types the DNAse I digestion step may need to be extended and/or the DNAse I concentration increased in order to achieve complete removal of the genomic DNA.
Fixation and fractionation artifacts. It is important to note that some proteins can relocalize during fixation or fractionation 6. Proteins released from the nucleus following disruption of the nuclear membrane for example can bind to sites that would otherwise be located in well separated compartments. These effects can be minimized by comparing results obtained using different fixation methods for example using paraformaldehyde in place of formaldehyde. Live cell imaging can also be helpful for whole cells at least 3.
This technique is well suited to the detection of GFP fusion proteins. However, it is important to confirm that the fusion protein behaves in a similar manner to the untagged protein. It is also important to confirm by titration that the proteins are expressed at comparable levels since protein over-expression can alter dramatically sub-cellular localization.
Applications of the technique:
This underutilized technique allows protein localization to be determined with reference to well-characterized markers of different subcellular domains or structures and has applications across many areas of cell biology. For example, many transcription factors display a complex distribution with localization to the cytoplasm, loosely held nucleoplasm, chromatin and/or nuclear matrix 1,2,4. Localization in each of these domains can influence protein function as well as protein turnover and post-translational modifications.
Protein co-localization to specific domains such as the nuclear matrix can provide insights into protein function. Protein re-localization in response to specific signals and/or the expression of partner proteins can also shed light on protein function 1,4.
No conflicts of interest declared.
Anyaporn Sawasdichai and Nazefah Abdul Hamid are grateful to the Royal Thai Government and the Government of Malaysia respectively for Ph.D. Scholarships. This work was funded by a Wellcome Trust project grant awarded to PSJ and KG. We are also grateful to the University of Bristol Wolfson Bioimaging Facility.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments | |
BSA | Chemical | Sigma-Aldrich | A9647-100G | |
DNase I | Chemical | Sigma-Aldrich | DN25-1G | |
poly-L-Lysine | Chemical | Sigma-Aldrich | P-8920 | |
Trypsin | Chemical | |||
EGTA | Chemical | Sigma-Aldrich | E4378-25G | |
Fomaldehyde | Chemical | VWR | 284216N | |
PIPES | Chemical | Sigma-Aldrich | P-6757 | |
Sucrose | Chemical | Fisher Scientific | S/8600/53 | |
Triton X-100 | Chemical | Sigma-Aldrich | T-6876 | |
Mounting Medium with DAPI | Chemical | Vector Laboratories | H-1200 | |
Fugene 6 Transfection Reagent | Chemical | Roche Group | 11814443001 | |
Histone H1 | Antibodies | Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. | SC-8030 | |
Lamin A/C | Antibodies | Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. | SC-20681 | |
Tubulin-α | Antibodies | Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. | SC-32293 |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone