Method Article
Here, a step-by-step protocol for the preparation and cultivation of porcine split corneal buttons is presented. As this organo-typically cultivated organ culture model shows cell death rates within 15 days, comparable to human donor corneas, it represents the first model allowing long-term cultivation of non-human corneas without adding toxic dextran.
Experimental research on corneal endothelial cells is associated with several difficulties. Human donor corneas are scarce and rarely available for experimental investigations as they are normally needed for transplantation. Endothelial cell cultures often do not translate well to in vivo situations. Due to the biostructural characteristics of non-human corneas, stromal swelling during cultivation induces substantial corneal endothelial cell loss, which makes it difficult to perform cultivation for an extended period of time. Deswelling agents such as dextran are used to counteract this response. However, they also cause significant endothelial cell loss. Therefore, an ex vivo organ culture model not requiring deswelling agents was established. Pig eyes from a local slaughterhouse were used to prepare split corneal buttons. After partial corneal trephination, the outer layers of the cornea (epithelium, bowman layer, parts of the stroma) were removed. This significantly reduces corneal endothelial cell loss induced by massive stromal swelling and Descemet's membrane folding throughout longer cultivation periods and improves general preservation of the endothelial cell layer. Subsequent complete corneal trephination was followed by the removal of the split corneal button from the remaining eye bulb and cultivation. Endothelial cell density was assessed at follow-up times of up to 15 days after preparation (i.e., days 1, 8, 15) using light microscopy. The preparation technique used allows a better preservation of the endothelial cell layer enabled by less stromal tissue swelling, which results in slow and linear decline rates in split corneal buttons comparable to human donor corneas. As this standardized organo-typically cultivated research model for the first time allows a stable cultivation for at least two weeks, it is a valuable alternative to human donor corneas for future investigations of various external factors with regards to their effects on the corneal endothelium.
Corneal transplantation procedures are among the most commonly performed transplantations worldwide1. As there is a severe shortage of human donor corneas, experimental research addressing corneal endothelial cells in human corneas is difficult to perform1. However, the introduction of irrigation solutions and other substances used within the eye, ophthalmic viscoelastic devices, as well as surgical instruments and techniques (e.g., phacoemulsification instruments and techniques, ultrasound energy) requires valid and extensive investigations regarding their effects on the corneal endothelium before clinical use.
Few alternatives to human donor corneas exist for research. Animal research models are very valuable but at the same time very resource consuming and increasingly questioned ethically. A major drawback of in vitro cell cultures is their limited translation to the human eye. Results obtained from cell cultures can be incongruous to in vivo conditions, because cells may undergo endothelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), resulting in fibroblast-like morphology caused by the loss of cell polarity and changes in cell shape and gene expression2.
Whereas previous ex vivo models reported cultivation periods of up to only 120 h, a novel preparation technique to establish a porcine corneal endothelial organ culture model by culturing fresh pig corneas for at least 15 days was recently introduced3,4,5,6. If the corneal epithelium and parts of the stroma are removed (approximately 300 µm in total) from the cornea prior to cultivation, swelling of the stroma is reduced in split corneal buttons resulting in less endothelial cell loss and a well maintained endothelial cell layer after up to 15 days, whereas non-split corneal buttons show significant endothelial cell loss due to uneven stromal swelling and formation of Descemet's folds. Eye banks usually use osmotic deswelling agents such as dextran to reduce swelling of corneas prior to transplantation. However, these agents were shown to induce increased endothelial cell loss7,8,9.
This article aims to visualize this standardized ex vivo research model in a detailed step-by-step protocol in order to enable future investigators to perform research on the corneal endothelium using split corneal buttons. This model represents a straightforward method to test substances and techniques used within the eye, such as ophthalmic viscoelastic devices, irrigation solutions, and ultrasound energy, or other procedures where the corneal endothelium is of interest.
This protocol follows the ethical guidelines of our institution. In accordance with the statutes of our institution's ethical review committee no ethical approval had to be obtained prior to the experiments, as all porcine corneas were obtained from the local slaughterhouse.
1. Organ culture
Figure 1: Dissection of the porcine cornea to obtain split corneal buttons. (A) After trephination of the cornea using a trephine with an inlay to cut into a depth of 300 µm and removal of the epithelium and parts of the stromal tissue, (B) a suture is placed superficially into the stroma without penetration of the corneal endothelium for later identification of the stromal side. (C) Full trephination of the remaining cornea is followed by (D) the removal of the obtained split corneal button from the eye bulb. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
2. Microscopy and examination of the endothelium
3. Analysis of the corneal endothelial cell density and morphological parameters
The presented dissection technique implies partial removal of stromal tissue, resulting in a thinner cornea sample and thus less stromal swelling (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Less stromal swelling induces less shear and pinch forces that have a negative impact on the corneal endothelium, thus causing lower endothelial cell loss rates6. Split corneal buttons show a significantly better-preserved endothelial cell layer after 15 days of cultivation compared to non-split corneal buttons and whole corneoscleral samples, which reflects less endothelial cell loss and a lower number of reformation figures (≥ 4 cells/cell borders conjoined instead of three), rosette formations (five or more radially arranged cells meeting in a single spot), and alizarin red (destroyed) cells after 15 days6.
Over a period of 15 days, split corneal buttons show a steady decline in endothelial cell density with an average weekly percental endothelial cell loss of 4.90% (n = 40, Figure 3). Starting off on day 1 with an endothelial cell density of 4,033 ± 146/163 cells/mm2 (median ± 25%/75% quartiles), cell density decreased to 3,850 ± 167/233 cells/mm2 on day 8, and 3,650 ± 200/233 cells/mm2 on day 15. Determined cell losses were similar for the first and second week. On days 1−8, 4.00 ± 2.17/1.93% (median ± 25%/75% quartiles); days 8−15, 4.88 ± 5.52/4.42%; days 1−15, 8.64 ± 4.32/2.71%). Thus, the given decline rate is similar to the rate reported in human donor corneas during cultivation in previous studies10,11,12.
Morphological parameters were assessed after staining of the endothelial cell layer on day 15 (n = 28, Figure 4). Reformation figures made up 7.18 ± 2.36/2.90% (median ± 25%/75% quartiles) of the merging cell borders. A median of 1.11 ± 1.11/15.56 rosette formations/mm2 (median ± 25%/75% quartiles) were present in the investigated samples, whereas 13.33 ± 4.44/11.67 alizarin red stained cells/mm2 (median ± 25%/75% quartiles) marked punctual cell losses.
Figure 5 provides representative images of the corneal endothelium during microscopic evaluation in hBSS (Figure 5A) and after staining with trypan blue and alizarin red S (Figure 5B). The assessment of the endothelial cell density in hBSS can be performed multiple times (e.g., on days 1, 8, and 15), whereas stained samples can be used for the assessment of morphological parameters (reformation figures, rosette formations, alizarin red stained cells) or determination of endothelial cell density at the end of the experiments due to the cytotoxic properties of most staining substances.
If the split corneal buttons are placed and cultivated with the endothelial side facing down by accident, extensive endothelial cell damage is to be expected (Figure 6A). Non-split corneal buttons suffer significantly increased endothelial cell loss due to stromal swelling, causing Descemet's membrane folding over 15 days of cultivation (Figure 6B), whereas split corneal buttons show a largely preserved corneal endothelium after 15 days of cultivation, indicated by scattered punctual alizarin red stained areas indicating single destroyed cells (Figure 6C).
Figure 2: Schematic illustration of non-split corneal buttons and split corneal buttons. After removal of 300 µm of the porcine cornea, including epithelium and major parts of the stromal tissue, the thickness of split corneal buttons is reduced in favor of better conservation of the corneal endothelium due to decreased stromal swelling throughout cultivation of up to 15 days. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Endothelial cell density (ECD) of split corneal buttons over 15 days. Split corneal buttons (n = 40) showed a steady decline. ECD on day 1, 4,033 ± 146/163 cells/mm2 (median ± 25%/75% quartiles); day 8, 3,850 ± 167/233 cells/mm2; day 15, 3,650 ± 200/233 cells/mm2. Data is depicted as median ± 25%/75% quartiles, whiskers represent either minimum and maximum or 1.5 of the interquartile range (IQR). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Morphological parameters for additional evaluation of cell damage and rearrangement processes. Microscopic photographs of the corneal endothelium in 400x magnification after 15 days of cultivation and staining with trypan blue and alizarin red S showing (A) reformation figures (arrows, joint meeting of four or more cells/cell borders instead of three), (B) rosette formations (dotted circle, central diminishing cell with characteristic rosette formations of five or more adjacent cells) and (C) alizarin red stained cells (dashed circles, destroyed cells). Data (n = 28) are depicted as median ± 25%/75% quartiles. Whiskers represent either minimum and maximum or 1.5 of the interquartile range (IQR). Circles represent outliers not within the IQR. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Unstained and stained corneal endothelium. The endothelial cell layer as seen during microscopic evaluation (400x magnification) in (A) hypotonic balanced salt solution (hBSS) causing endothelial cell swelling and thus better cell visibility and (B) after staining with trypan blue and alizarin red S. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: Overview photographs of the corneal endothelium of (A) a split corneal button cultivated upside down, (B) a non-split corneal button, and (C) a split corneal button after staining. Photographs show the corneal endothelium after staining with trypan blue and alizarin red S. (A) Extensive corneal endothelial cell damage (red area) is observed after split corneal buttons are cultivated with the endothelial side facing down after one week of cultivation. (B) Significantly increased endothelial cell damage in non-split corneal buttons due to Descemet's membrane folding and stromal swelling after 15 days of cultivation (red streaks). (C) Split corneal buttons show a well-preserved endothelial cell layer after 15 days of cultivation only showing punctual destroyed cells seen in alizarin red stained areas. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
This protocol provides a method for the preparation of porcine split corneal buttons, which represents a standardized and low-cost ex vivo corneal endothelial organ culture model for research purposes6. Porcine split corneal buttons showed a decrease of the endothelial cell density comparable to endothelial cell losses observed in human donor corneas cultivated in eye banks over a two-week period6,10,11,12.
The superiority over non-split corneal buttons as well as whole porcine corneoscleral samples was shown previously6. In that study, three groups were compared on days 1, 8, and 15. The corneal endothelium of all groups (corneoscleral buttons, non-split corneal buttons, split corneal buttons) was in good condition on day 1, represented by a well-preserved endothelial cell layer6. However, due to stromal swelling, folding of the Descemet's membrane destroyed large areas of the endothelium of whole corneoscleral samples, so that a representative assessment of the corneal endothelial cell density on days 8 and 15 could not be performed. Although the endothelium of the non-split corneal buttons was well preserved until day 15, some Descemet's membrane folds were also present. Although compared to the corneoscleral samples the endothelial cell layer of non-split corneal buttons was in better condition, the endothelial cell layer of the split corneal buttons was in far better condition. This can be seen in quantitative and qualitative parameters, as the endothelial cell loss within 15 days of cultivation was significantly higher (p = 0.041) in non-split corneal buttons (-575 ± 25/250 cells/mm2) compared to split corneal buttons (-417 ± 138/179 cells/mm2), which is congruent to the determined morphological characteristics evident in a more regular hexagon cell pattern, fewer reformation figures and rosette formations, as well as fewer destroyed cells (alizarin red areas) in split corneal buttons6. Percental endothelial cell losses confirm these findings, as the percental cell loss within 15 days in non-split and split corneal buttons is 14.89% and 10.2% (p = 0.032) respectively6. As this method was validated for a period of up to 15 days, it allows longer observation periods than published studies thus far (72 to 120 h)3,4,5.
The improvements in the preservation of the endothelial cell layer, applying common cultivating protocols also used in eye banks, can solely be attributed to the reduced swelling of the corneal stroma, since a major portion (300 µm) of the stroma is removed prior to cultivation6,13. Normally the stroma tends to swell enormously during cultivation due to its hydrophilic properties and molecules embedded within the stromal tissue14,15. Swelling, which induces shear and pinch forces and Descemet's membrane folding, which also causes mechanical strain on the corneal endothelium and endothelial cell loss, are reduced after partial removal of the stroma6,10. As opposed to eye banks, which often use osmotic agents such as dextran to deswell human donor corneas before transplantation, split corneal buttons do not require osmotic deswelling16,17. As culture medium supplemented with dextran is known to be absorbed by corneal endothelial cells and to induce increased cell loss7,8,9,18,19,20, the cultivation of split corneal buttons without dextran (or other osmotic agents) eliminates as many negative toxic factors as possible6. As the culture medium is not supplemented with any additives in the presented method, no toxic influences caused by any added substance are expected, which makes this model valuable for investigations of biocompatibility tests of new substances.
Although the corneal endothelium is a very delicate cell layer and the preparation of split corneal buttons requires moderate surgical skills and gentle handling, this technique can be a standardized method to work with and to obtain reliable results regarding the effects of various factors on the corneal endothelium within a very reasonable time frame. Nonetheless, there are a few steps in this protocol where the corneal endothelium is at risk. Obviously damaged or opaque eyes need to be carefully identified and discarded in the beginning to prevent possible biases. Also, the corneal endothelium must always be left untouched during trephination, dissection, extraction, and handling (e.g., transferring from eye to culture plate, from culture plate to culture plate, etc.) of split corneal buttons in order to prevent any mechanical damage. When placing the suture superficially in the stroma, the endothelium may potentially be penetrated if the needle is accidentally inserted too far in depth. If so, noticeable fluid from the anterior eye chamber will be passing through the suture channel and the corresponding eye needs to be discarded. To prevent this, the needle should be kept superficially within the stroma. Furthermore, care must be taken to strictly split the corneal button horizontally using the scalpel. Uneven cutting will result in uneven swelling during cultivation, possibly causing increased endothelial cell loss.
The examination of unstained corneal endothelial cells in hBSS is commonly performed in human donor corneas. There is no evidence of significant cell damage caused by osmotic swelling of the endothelial cells for the chosen examination time of split corneal buttons in hBSS3. Although staining enhances the visibility of cell borders, unstained counting does not result in significantly different results of the endothelial cell density compared to stained counting21. The clear benefit of unstained counting is that it allows multiple follow up examinations throughout the course of the experiments, whereas staining substances are usually cytotoxic and terminate the observation period. Stained counting, however, remains important to assess the morphological characteristics of the endothelium. Trypan blue highlights the nuclei of damaged cells that often seem undamaged in unstained counting. Alizarin red S clearly enhances the visibility of the cell borders and damaged cells by staining the Descemet's membrane, which facilitates the assessment of the endothelial cell density and allows the analysis of morphological features of the corneal endothelium, such as reformation figures, rosette formations, and alizarin red stained cells (Figure 4).
A major limitation of split corneal buttons as an ex vivo model is that, just like in vitro models, they are only suitable for investigating external influences on corneal endothelial cells. Therefore, in vivo models are irreplaceable for research on systemic diseases and conditions with an impact on the eye and the corneal endothelium. Regardless, this preparation technique can generate valid data for testing the effects of various external factors on the corneal endothelium (e.g., in biocompatibility testing of new substances)22. Following the 3R-principle (replacement, reduction, refinement) to reduce the number of live animal experiments, this method provides an adequate research model to further close the gap between in vitro cell cultures, where results are often incongruous to the in vivo situation in humans, and animal research, which requires substantial efforts and increasingly raises ethical concerns23.
Due to their properties and availability, pig eyes seem to be the only adequate substitute for human eyes for research purposes. Corneas from non-human primates are not a good alternative due to ethical reasons and availability, although these animals are the closest species to humans. On the other hand, the eyes of smaller animals are simply too small to allow efficient cornea removal. Pig eyes are comparable to human eyes in size and show similar properties of the corneal endothelial cells, which is also reflected in the research dealing with possible future xenotransplantation of genetically modified porcine corneas24,25,26. Also, being a by-product of slaughterhouses, they are easy to obtain.
In conclusion, the presented method using porcine corneas offers a highly reproducible organo-typically cultivated research model enabling cost-efficient research on corneal endothelial cells. Future investigators may use split corneal buttons to analyze the effects of various factors such as new substances, surgical techniques, equipment, and other possible external influences where the corneal endothelium is of great interest.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The establishment of the presented research model was supported by KMU-innovativ (FKZ: 13GW0037F) of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research Germany.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Subject | |||
Pig eyes | local abbatoir | ||
Substances | |||
Alizarin red S | Sigma-Aldrich, USA | ||
Culture Medium 1, #F9016 | Biochrom GmbH, Germany | ||
Dulbecco's PBS (1x) | Gibco, USA | ||
Fetal calf serum | Biochrom GmbH, Germany | ||
Hydrochloric acid (HCl) solution | own production | ||
Hypotonic balanced salt solution | own production | per 1 L of H2O: NaCl 4.9 g; KCl 0.75 g; CaCl x H2O 0.49 g; MgCl2 x H2O 0.3 g; Sodium Acetate x 3 H2O 3.9 g; Sodium Citrate x 2 H2O 1.7 g | |
Povidon iodine 7.5%, Braunol | B. Braun Melsungen AG, Germany | ||
Sodium chloride (NaCl) 0.9% | B. Braun Melsungen AG, Germany | ||
Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution | own production | ||
Trypan blue 0.4% | Sigma-Aldrich, USA | ||
Materials & Instruments | |||
Accu-jet pro | Brand GmbH, Germany | ||
Beaker Glass 50 mL | Schott AG, Germany | ||
Blunt cannula incl. Filter (5 µm) 18G | Becton Dickinson, USA | ||
Cell culture plate (12 well) | Corning Inc., USA | ||
Colibri forceps | Geuder AG, Germany | ||
Corneal scissors | Geuder AG, Germany | ||
Eppendorf pipette | Eppendorf AG, Germany | ||
Eye Bulb Holder | L. Klein, Germany | ||
Eye scissors | Geuder AG, Germany | ||
Folded Filter ø 185 mm | Whatman, USA | ||
Hockey knife | Geuder AG, Germany | ||
Laboratory Glass Bottle with cap 100 mL | Schott AG, Germany | ||
Magnetic stir bar | Carl Roth GmbH & Co. KG, Germany | ||
MillexGV Filter (5 µm) | Merck Millopore Ltd., USA | ||
Needler holder | Geuder AG, Germany | ||
Petri dishes | VWR International, USA | ||
Pipette tips | Sarstedt AG & Co., Germany | ||
Scalpel (single use), triangular blade | Aesculap AG & Co. KG, Germany | ||
Serological pipette 10 mL | Sarstedt AG & Co., Germany | ||
Serological pipette 5 mL | Sarstedt AG & Co., Germany | ||
Sterile cups | Greiner Bio-One, Österreich | ||
Sterile gloves | Paul Hartmann AG, Germany | ||
Sterile surgical drape | Paul Hartmann AG, Germany | ||
Stitch scissors | Geuder AG, Germany | ||
Suture Ethilon 10-0 Polyamid 6 | Ethicon Inc., USA | ||
Syringe (5 mL) | Becton Dickinson, USA | ||
trephine ø 7.5 mm | own production | ||
Tying forceps | Geuder AG, Germany | ||
Weighing paper | neoLab Migge GmbH, Germany | ||
Equipment & Software | |||
Binocular surgical microscope | Carl Zeiss AG, Germany | ||
Camera mounted on microscope | Olympus, Japan | ||
CellSens Entry (software) | Olympus, Japan | ||
Cold-light source | Schott AG, Germany | ||
Incubator | Heraeus GmbH, Germany | ||
Inverted phase contrast microscope | Olympus GmbH, Germany | ||
Magnetic stirrer with heating function | IKA-Werke GmbH & Co. KG, Germany | ||
pH-meter pHenomenal | VWR International, USA | ||
Photoshop CS2 | Adobe Systems, USA | ||
Precision scale | Ohaus Europe GmbH, Switzerland |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone