Method Article
This paper describes how to create bioengineered mouse lungs using decellularization and recellularization methods. It also details subsequent orthotopic lung transplantation.
Lung transplantation is a critical treatment for patients with end-stage lung diseases like idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, but challenges such as donor shortages and posttransplant complications persist. Bioengineered lungs, integrating patient-specific cells into decellularized animal scaffolds, present a promising alternative. Despite progress in using bioengineered lungs in animal models, functionality and structure remain immature. This protocol addresses a critical barrier in organ bioengineering: the need for a cost-effective experimental platform. By using mouse models instead of larger animals like rats or swine, researchers can significantly reduce the resources required for each experiment, accelerating research progress.
The protocol outlines a detailed procedure for lung bioengineering using mouse heart-lung blocks and human primary cells, focusing on isolation strategy for the mouse heart-lung block, decellularization, bioreactor setup, perfusion-based organ culture, and orthotopic transplantation of bioengineered lungs. This mouse-scale platform not only reduces experimental costs but also provides a viable framework for optimizing cell types and numbers for recellularization, testing different cell types using histological and molecular methods, and ensuring blood flow post-transplantation. The method holds potential for broad applications, including studying cell interactions in three-dimensional culture conditions, cell-matrix interactions, and ex vivo cancer modeling, thereby advancing the field of organ bioengineering.
Lung transplantation has been the decisive cure for patients having end-stage lung disease1 such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, where drug treatment is ineffective to stop the deterioration of respiratory function. More eligible patients add up to the waiting list every year; however, the number of organ donations from deceased donors has been trailing the increasing number of waiting patients2,3. Even after undergoing lung transplantation, quite a few problems would degrade the function of transplanted lungs, including primary organ dysfunction, reactive allogenic syndrome, and infections, which significantly lower the 5-year survival of the lung transplantation recipients4.
Several options exist to counter the current problems in organ transplantation, including the utilization of marginal donors5, recovery of donor lungs in an ex vivo lung perfusion system6, and xenotransplantation using gene-edited swine7. These alternatives can expand the pool of donor organs; however, none can entirely address the donor organs' scarcity, immunogenicity, and functional heterogeneity.
It is far from reality but bioengineered artificial organs where patient-specific cells are integrated into the decellularized animal organ scaffold are a fascinating potential source of solid organ transplantation8. Several pioneering studies that demonstrated the potential utility of bioengineered lungs have been reported since 20109,10. In these studies, lungs from rats or swine were decellularized by detergents, animal or human cells were injected from the trachea or pulmonary vasculature to regenerate the lung tissue in the perfusion-based bioreactor, and some of them were transplanted orthotopically into the animal thoracic cavities11,12,13,14,15. However, the function and structure of the bioengineered lungs were premature, presumably because of the inadequate number of cells cultured in the bioreactor or less integrated intercellular junctions.
One obstacle to advancing research in organ bioengineering is the lack of a small-scale experimental platform. While rats or swine are the commonly used animals in this field, they require >108 lung cells per lung16, which is highly costly to academic labs. If mice are available for organ bioengineering research, we could dramatically reduce the cost of each experiment and speed up the research program. Although there exist anatomical differences between mouse and human lungs17, the basic architecture of the lung is similar across mammals18. Therefore, the results of mouse-scale experiments can apply to larger animals by simply multiplying the number according to the body size.
This protocol aims to describe the detailed experimental procedure of lung bioengineering using mouse heart-lung blocks and human primary cells19. We adopted previously reported and widely used mouse lung decellularization protocol for this study20,21,22. The challenging part of lung bioengineering is the recellularization of the decellularized capillary vasculature20; therefore, human umbilical cord vein endothelial cells will be used in this protocol.
All experiments followed the Regulations for Animal Experiments and Related Activities at Tohoku University (15th edition), published by Tohoku University23. This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Tohoku University (#2020AcA-041-01).
1. Preparation of materials for decellularization
2. Culture of human primary cells
3. Bioreactor setup and perfusion organ culture
4. Orthotopic transplantation of the bioengineered lung
Following the decellularization protocol, mouse lungs are visibly white and translucent (Figure 6A). Cellular components should be entirely removed, but the alveolar structure remains intact in the histological observation (Figure 6B,C). Recellularized mouse lungs using 3 × 107 HUVECs with 2 day perfusion-based bioreactor culture show a homogeneous distribution of HUVECs (Figure 7A). HUVECs migrate into the peripheral alveolar area, forming a capillary network (Figure 7B). After the orthotopic transplantation and reperfusion of bioengineering lungs, blood flow containing red blood cells is homogeneously observed in the bioengineered lungs (Figure 8A,B).
Figure 1: Cannulation of the mouse heart-lung block. (A) Prepared pulmonary artery catheters. (B) Schema of cannulation. (C) Representative image after the completion of cannulation. Scale bars = 1 cm (A,C). This figure was adopted from Tomiyama et al.19. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Preparation of the organ chamber. (A) Holes are cut as described. (B) Tubing is inserted as indicated. (C) Preparation of the cap for an autoclavable glass 250 mL glass bottle for the cell reservoir. (D) The 250 mL glass bottle placed on the magnetic stirrer. This figure was adopted from Tomiyama et al.19. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Perfusion-based bioreactor setup. (A) Parts and assembly. (B) Actual setup. Note that tubing is inserted between a glass door and a rubber seal. (C) A snapshot during the pump-driven perfusion organ culture. This figure was adopted from Tomiyama et al.19. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Preparation of the bioengineered lung for transplantation. (A) Placement of the engineered lung. (B) Dissection of the hilum. (C) Dissection of the main PA. (D) Dissection of the PV. (E) Insertion of the PA into the cuff. (F) Fixation of the PV to the cuff. (G) Insertion of the PV into the cuff. (H) Fixation of the PV to the cuff. (I) Insertion and fixation of the left bronchus to the cuff. Abbreviations: PA = pulmonary artery; PV = pulmonary vein. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Procedure of orthotopic transplantation of the bioengineered lung. (A) Dissection of the recipient's PA. (B) Making a slipknot around the recipient's PA. (C) Clipping of the PV and bronchus. (D) Incising the PA. (E) Placement of the bioengineered left lung. (F) Insertion of the cuffed PA of the bioengineered lung into the recipient's PA. (G) Securing the PA around the cuff. (H) Insertion of the bronchial cuff of the bioengineered lung into the recipient's bronchus. (I) Insertion of the PV of the bioengineered lung into the recipient's PV. (J) Securing the PA around the cuff. Abbreviations: PA = pulmonary artery; PV = pulmonary vein; Br = bronchus; * = slipknot; † = aneurysmal clip; § = 10-0 nylon tie. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: Decellularization of the mouse lung. (A) Macroscopic image of the decellularized lung. (B) Low-power image of the decellularized lung (magnification, 100x). (C) High-power hematoxylin- and eosin-stained image of the decellularized lung. Note that there is no visible cellular component (magnification, 400x). Scale bars = 100 µm (B), 50 µm (C). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 7: Revascularized mouse lung using HUVECs. (A) Low-power hematoxylin- and eosin-stained image of the revascularized lung (magnification, 200x, tiling). (B) High-power H&E-stained image of the revascularized lung (magnification, 200x). Scale bars = 1000 µm (A), 100 µm (B). Abbreviations: HUVECs = human umbilical cord vein endothelial cells; H&E = hematoxylin and eosin. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 8: Lung image after transplantation and blood reperfusion. (A) Low-power H&E image of the revascularized lung after 10 min of reperfusion (magnification, 200x, tiling). (B) High-power H&E image of the revascularized lung after 10 min of reperfusion (magnification, 200x). Scale bars = 1000 µm (A), 100 µm (B). Abbreviation: H&E = hematoxylin and eosin. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Organ bioengineering is a demanding enterprise. The costly screening process has been hindering this field's research and development cycle. By using mice as an experimental platform, space, cells, and media are significantly reduced compared to the previously used rat platform. Although measuring detailed physical parameters such as gas exchange, vascular resistance, or lung compliance has not been achieved yet, the mouse lung model allows for accelerated research timelines as it enables rapid iteration of experimental protocols and testing of cell viability, integration, and scaffold interaction. Mice reproduce quickly and are available in numerous genetically modified strains, offering flexibility in studying various genetic and cellular modifications in vivo. This ability to rapidly test hypotheses and optimize protocols helps advance our understanding of the optimal cellular environments and culture techniques required for successful lung bioengineering. By refining techniques in mouse models, researchers can establish scalable methods and protocols that can later be translated to larger animal models and, eventually, human applications.
The critical step of the procedure is inserting and fixation a PA catheter. The fixation of the PA catheter is only possible by utilizing a small diameter catheter (<3 Fr) with a collar at the tip. Because of the fragile nature of the lungs, surgery should be performed entirely with caution. No metal instruments should touch the lung surface; otherwise, the lung would suffer significant leakage. Use a cotton swab to maneuver the lungs when necessary. The authors assume that researchers might efficiently perform the canulation procedure after training using 10-15 mice.
The decellularization protocol described here is based on previous reports22,24. Other protocols using different detergent sets can be applicable. The heart-lung block should always be treated with caution. Typical incidents during the decellularization procedure include the penetration of the PA catheter, come-off of the tracheal catheter, and air leakage. The authors have not experimentally confirmed the integrity of the decellularized scaffold after refrigerated storage in PBS. Still, the authors have not experienced problems using decellularized heart-lung blocks stored in PBS for up to 4 weeks.
Avoiding bacterial contamination is crucial. All glass equipment, PVDF, and silicon parts must be autoclaved before the experiment. The other parts should be used only once. To minimize the risk of bacterial contamination, all procedures should be performed in a clean biosafety cabinet. It is desirable to include antimycotics as well as antibiotics in the media. Frequent media changes during the perfusion increase the risk of contamination. In addition, air bubbles must always be avoided in the tubing. Air bubbles in the tubing are subsequently trapped in the decellularized scaffold, which could blockade media perfusion in the peripheral area and result in heterogeneous cell distribution. Moreover, endothelial cells should be thoroughly detached by trypsinization or other appropriate cell dissociation media. Cell pellets should be disrupted well to make a homogeneous single-cell suspension. Too much cell density (e.g., >2 million cells/mL) could promote the formation of cell clumps, which could result in embolism in the proximal vasculature.
We have tested only a short period (2 or 3 days) of perfusion bioreactor culture. In our previous study, we used varying numbers of endothelial cells to revascularize the decellularized mouse lung scaffold and found that there is a threshold where adding more cells does not improve the cell coverage, which was ~3 × 107 endothelial cells per mouse lung-heart block19. We expect that a longer culture duration (e.g., 14 days) will improve the coverage and maturation of recellularized vasculature, as described in the previous lung bioengineering studies9,10,15,25.
The basis of the bioengineered lung graft preparation is similar to that of a regular mouse lung transplantation26,27. The engineered lung tissue is not as fragile as a regular lung graft. The challenge is that the lung tissue, including the hilum structure, is entirely white or almost transparent. A precise understanding of local anatomy is indispensable for successful transplantation. The stable technique should be earned using native lungs. The authors assume that researchers might comfortably perform the transplantation procedure after training using 100 mice.
Transplantation of the bioengineered lung using human-derived cells in the mouse is technically available; however, acute rejection of the graft is inevitable due to the xenotransplantation nature of this model. This model can be used for testing the short-term recellularization efficiency of the bioengineered lungs, and the long-term functionality should be investigated using immunodeficient mice.
Although it was not tested in the current method, whole lung bioengineering using both endothelial and epithelial cells should be technically not that challenging, considering the difficulties in pulmonary vascular engineering described here. Furthermore, this mouse-scale platform can be expanded to other fields of research, such as the investigation of cellular interaction in 3D culture conditions, cell-matrix interaction, ex-vivo cancer modeling, and so on. In summary, this method provides a reasonable and robust lung bioengineering platform.
The authors do not have any conflicts of interest regarding this manuscript.
This study was financially supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research / KAKENHI (C) #20K09174, #23K08308, the Fund for the Promotion of Joint International Research (Fostering Joint International Research (B)) #22KK0132 for TS, JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 21K08877 for TW, Leave a Nest Grant Ikeda-Rika award for FT, and the Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows #21J21515 for FT. We greatly appreciate Ms. Maiko Ueda, technical staff in the Biomedical Research Core of Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, for her intensive work in histological observation. We also appreciate the technical advice of Ms. Yumi Yoshida and Mr. Koji Kaji in the Center of Research Instruments at IDAC, Tohoku University, for their image processing support.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
DECELLULARIZATION | |||
27 G x 1/2 in. BD PrecisionGlide Needle | BD | 305109 | Or equivalent 27 G injection needle |
BD Insyte IV Catheter 20 GA X 1.8 8IN | BD | 381237 | Or equivalent 20 G IV catheter |
Blade silk suture (4-0) | Nesco | GA04SB | Or equivalent |
CaCl2 | Sigma-Aldrich | C5670 | |
Catheter for rat jugular vein, PU 2Fr 10 cm | Instech | C20PU-MJV1301 | Recommended for mice weighs 30 g and under. |
Catheter for rat jugular vein, PU 3Fr 10 cm | Instech | C30PU-RJV1307 | Recommended for mice weighs over 30 g. |
DNase I | Sigma-Aldrich | DN25 | |
MgSO4 | Sigma-Aldrich | M7506 | |
NaCl | Sigma-Aldrich | S3014 | |
PinPort injectors | Instech | PNP3M | |
PinPorts, 22 G | Instech | PNP3F22-50 | Fits C30PU-RJV1307 |
PinPorts, 25 G | Instech | PNP3F25-50 | Fits C20PU-MJV1301 |
Sodium deoxycholate | Sigma-Aldrich | D6750 | |
Sterile syringe, 5 mL | Generic | ||
Triton X-100 | Sigma-Aldrich | 9036-19-5 | |
CELL CULTURE | |||
EGM-2 Endothelial Cell Growth Medium-2 BulletKit | Lonza | CC-3162 | |
HUVEC – Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells | Lonza | C2519A | |
PERFUSION-BASED BIOREACTOR | |||
20 G needle | Generic | ||
3-way stopcock | Generic | ||
Cork borer | Generic | Boring size, 6-10 mm | |
EasyLoad III pump head | Cole-Parmer | 243934 | |
Glass canister | Hario | SCN-200T | Inner diameter: 80 mm |
Heating magnetic stirrer | Generic | ||
Lure fitting, PVDF, For Soft Tube | Nordson Medical | 2-9965-01 | Female, fits tubing with I.D. 1.5 mm (L/S 14) |
Lure fitting, PVDF, For Soft Tube | Nordson Medical | 2-9964-01 | Male, fits tubing with I.D. 1.5 mm (L/S 14) |
Lure fitting, PVDF, For Soft Tube | Nordson Medical | 2-9965-03 | Female, fits tubing with I.D. 3 mm (L/S 16) |
Lure fitting, PVDF, For Soft Tube | Nordson Medical | 2-9964-03 | Male, fits tubing with I.D. 3 mm (L/S 16) |
Magnetic stirring bar | Generic | ||
Masterflex L/S Digital Precision Modular Drive with Remote I/O and Benchtop Controller | Cole-Parmer | 07557-00 | |
Masterflex L/S Precision Pump Tubing, PharMed BPT, L/S 16 | Cole-Parmer | 06508-16 | |
Masterflex L/S Pricision Pump Tubing, Platinum-Cured Silicone, L/S 14 | Cole-Parmer | 96410-14 | |
Millex-GP Syringe Filter Unit, 0.22 µm, polyethersulfone, 33 mm, gamma sterilized | Millipore | SLGPR33RS | |
Pyrex 250 mL grass bottle, GL-45 screw cap | Corning | 1395-250 | |
Silicon Septa for GL45 Open Top PBT Screw Cap | Corning | 1395-455S | |
Silicone Light Stopper | IMG | 07763-18 | Upper diameter: 87 mm, Lower diameter: 75 mm |
Sterile syringe, 10 mL, 50 mL | Generic | ||
MOUSE SURGERY (Isolation of the heart-lung block | Lung transplantation) | |||
10-0 Nylon ties | Kono Seisakusho | N/A | |
10-0 Silk ties | Kono Seisakusho | N/A | |
4-0 Silk ties | Kono Seisakusho | N/A | |
Arterial clamp, 45 mm curved, grooved | Natsume seisakusyo | C-17-45 | |
BD Insyte IV Catheter 24GA | BD | 381512 | Or equivalent 24G i.v. catheter |
Bulldog Vascular Forceps 45mm curved | Natsume seisakusyo | M2 | |
Butorphanol tartrate | Meiji Seika Pharma | N/A | |
Cefazolin Sodium | Otsuka Pharmaceutical | N/A | |
Dumont forceps #5/45 | Fine Science Tools | 1251-35 | |
Fine vannas style spring scissors | Fine Science Tools | 15403-08 | 45° tip, 0.01 x 0.06 mm |
Gemini Cautery Kit | Harvard Apparatus | RS-300 | |
Halsted-Mosquito clamp curved tip, 125 mm | Bioresearch center | 16181670 | |
Hegar needle holder, 150 mm | B Braun/Aesculap | BM065R | |
Heparine solution | Mochida Seiyaku | N/A | |
Medetomidine | Nippon Zenyaku Kogyo | N/A | |
Micro forceps straight | B Braun/Aesculap | BD33R | |
Midazolam | Sandoz | N/A | |
Mouse Ventilator | Harvard Apparatus | Model 687™ | |
Normal Saline, Clinical grade | Otsuka Pharmaceutical | N/A | |
Petri dish, 60 x 15 mm | BD | 351007 | |
Safelet Cath PU 20 gauge polyurethan catheter | Nipro | 09-031 | |
Sakaki stainless scissors curved 14 cm | Bioresearch center | 64152034 | |
Scalpel holder | Bioresearch center | 16101040 | |
Small animal retraction system | Fine Science Tools | 18200-20 | |
Spare blade scalpel #11 | Muranaka Medical Instruments | 567-001-03 | |
Spring scissors, 15 cm | Bioresearch center | PRI13-3736 | |
Stereomicroscope | Leica Microsystems | M525 | Clinical-grade surgical microscope with a flexible arm system is preferable. |
Sugita titanium aneurysm clip curved slim, No.98 | Mizuho medical | 17-001-98 | |
Sugita titanium clip applier, 110 mm | Mizuho medical | 17-013-53 | |
Temperature-adjustable electric warmer | Generic | ||
Ultrafine cotton swab | Generic | ||
VASCULAR AND BRONCHIAL CUFF | |||
Fine sandpaper | Generic | ||
Venula 20 gauge Teflon angiocatheter | Top | 1160 | |
Venula 22 gauge Teflon angiocatheter | Top | 1161 | |
Venula 24 gauge Teflon angiocatheter | Top | 1124 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved