We thank CAPES-Brazil, CNPq-Brazil, FAP/DF for financial support. We are grateful to Dr. Hugo Costa Paes for revising the manuscript.

1. Solutions and Media
<ol>
	<li>Prepare 2X Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium, phosphate buffered saline (PBS), Sabouraud dextrose broth, and Sabouraud dextrose agar as per Table 1.</li>
</ol>
2. Fungal Inoculum Growth Conditions
<ol>
	<li>Store all fungal strains as frozen stocks in 35% glycerol at -80 &#176;C, until needed.</li>
	<li>Perform the following steps before each experiment.
	<ol>
		<li>For Candida albicans strains:
		<ol>
			<li>Thaw a stock vial and transfer 200 &#181;L to 10 mL of Sabouraud dextrose broth in a sterile 50 mL polypropylene tube with a cap and culture overnight at 30 &#176;C with agitation (200 rpm). Remember to incline the tube and leave the cap slightly open for better aeration of the culture.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>For Cryptococcus neoformans strains:
		<ol>
			<li>Scrape the frozen surface of a stock vial. Plate the cells onto Sabouraud dextrose agar plates and incubate for 48 h at 30 &#176;C. After visible growth of isolated colonies, keep the plates in the refrigerator (4 &#176;C) sealed with paraffin film for up to 15 days.</li>
			<li>Collect a medium-sized isolated colony from the plate using a sterile toothpick or sterile inoculating loop and inoculate 10 mL of Sabouraud dextrose broth in a sterile 50 mL conical tube. Incubate for approximately 24 h at 30 &#176;C under agitation (200 rpm).</li>
			<li>Do not exceed the 24 h incubation. Remember to incline the tube and leave the cap slightly open for better aeration. It is always good to standardize the growth stage of the cells before each test, since this is an important factor affecting antimicrobial resistance. 
			NOTE: Both fungi were grown at 30 &#176;C for rapid propagation in our experiments, but the temperature can be changed to reflect the aims of the study, for example clinical treatment (37 &#176;C). Most importantly, this initial incubation time should be established beforehand for each fungal isolate and maintained throughout all the tests to ensure reproducibility.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>After fungal growth, collect the cells by centrifuging the conical tubes at 1,200 x g for 5 min at room temperature. Discard the supernatant and add 10 mL of PBS.</li>
	<li>Resuspend the cells and centrifuge again at 1,200 x g for 5 min at room temperature.</li>
	<li>Repeat the PBS wash and centrifugation twice more. After the third wash, resuspend the cells in 5 mL (according to the pellet size) of 2X RPMI-1640 medium.</li>
	<li>Prepare 1 mL of a 1:100 or 1:1,000 dilution in a microcentrifuge tube (depending on the turbidity of the cell suspension).</li>
	<li>Aliquot 10 &#181;L of this dilution, place it in a hemocytometer chamber and count the total number of cells in the four corner quadrants under the microscope. Calculate the concentration by the formula: (total cell number/4) x dilution factor x 104 (chamber dilution constant).
	<ol>
		<li>Consider a 100% viability if viability counts and growth conditions have been systematically correlated for the isolate being studied. 
		NOTE: The standardization and quality control of viability counts can be done by back-plating in accordance to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) antifungal Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) method for yeasts10.</li>
		<li>If the growth/viability correlation has not been established for the isolate under study, measure the fungal viability by counting live cells in a hemocytometer with the aid of dyes that selectively color dead cells, such as phloxine B11, trypan blue12, or Janus Green13. Use the fungal cells for this protocol only if the viability of the population at this point is 90% or above. 
		NOTE: Dead/alive dyes may not work well with the fungus of choice. Please test them before use. For example, the trypan blue dye does not work well with C. neoformans.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>After that, prepare the cell suspensions in 2X RPMI-1640 medium (2X adjusted inoculum in RPMI-1640 medium). For 96-well plates consider a volume of 5 mL for each plate.
	<ol>
		<li>For all C. albicans strains, prepare a stock cell suspension of 4 x 103 cells/mL. This concentration is 2X of the final cell concentration in each well (2 x 103 cells/mL).</li>
		<li>For C. neoformans strains, prepare a stock culture of cells 2 x 104 cells/mL. This concentration is twice the final cell concentration in each well (1 x 104 cells/mL).</li>
		<li>For other fungi, test with a known antifungal which concentration will be ideal for the particular study in relation to the incubation time. Take metabolism and duplication time of the fungus into consideration.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
3. Peptides (Unknown Agent)
<ol>
	<li>Store the lyophilized peptides at -20 &#176;C, and dissolve them in deionized water before each experiment. The maximum storage time once dissolved in water will depend on the nature of each peptide.</li>
	<li>Prepare aliquots of twice the highest final concentration tested in the assay (2X). Ideally, prepare a small number of aliquots with enough peptide for one time use to avoid freeze-thaw cycles. 
	NOTE: The choice of concentration should be based on literature and the properties of the peptide. It is recommended to start the serial dilutions with approximately 100 &#181;M of the peptide, and then decrease or increase this concentration range depending on the obtained results.</li>
</ol>
4. Reference Antifungals (Positive Controls)
<ol>
	<li>For those diluted in water: prepare a 2X solution of the highest concentration of the analysis (see Section 5: Antifungal Assay for the dilution steps).
	<ol>
		<li>For C. albicans strains, prepare a solution of 128 &#181;g/mL of fluconazole or 128 &#181;g/mL of caspofungin. The plate concentration for both will be 64 &#181;g/mL.</li>
		<li>For C. neoformans strains, prepare a solution of 32 &#181;g/mL of amphotericin B (water-soluble solution). The plate concentration will be 16 &#181;g/mL. 
		NOTE: Normally amphotericin B is diluted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), since this anti-fungal is poorly soluble in water. However, there are water-soluble amphotericin B preparations commercially available.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>For antifungals diluted in an organic solvent: prepare a 100X stock solution in DMSO, then dilute it to 10X in water for use. 
	NOTE: Thus, in the well, the final concentration of DMSO will not exceed 1%. A well where the fungus will grow in media containing 1% DMSO as control is required given that some fungi do not tolerate well this concentration of the solvent. Remember that DMSO is photosensitive, so cover the plate with foil or place it in a dark chamber for the duration of the incubation period.</li>
</ol>
5. Antifungal Assay
NOTE: In vitro antifungal assays are performed based on the broth microdilution susceptibility test from Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M27-A3 guidelines with some modifications.
<ol>
	<li>Prepare a two-fold serial dilution of each peptide and control antifungal in 96-well polystyrene microplates to a final volume of 50 &#181;L.
	<ol>
		<li>Using a pipette add 100 &#181;L of the antifungal/peptide in the 2X concentration of the highest desired final concentration in columns 1-3, in row A.</li>
		<li>Using a multichannel pipette, add 50 &#181;L of sterile water into the other wells, in rows B to H.</li>
		<li>Remove 50 &#181;L of the wells with the highest concentration (row A), transfer to the next well of the next concentration (row B) and homogenize.</li>
		<li>Repeat the above steps until the well with the lowest concentration and discard 50 &#181;L of this well (row H). Leave Columns 11 and 12 (rows A, B, C) with only water for either blank control or negative/growth control.</li>
		<li>Add 50 &#181;L of the 2X adjusted inoculum in RPMI-1640 medium to each well (columns 1-3 plus column 11 (negative/growth control)); the final concentration for C. albicans will be 2 x 103 cells/mL, and the final concentration for C. neoformans strains will be 104 cells/mL.</li>
		<li>Prepare blank controls (50 &#181;L water + 50 &#181;L 2X RPMI-1640 medium without cells) and negative/growth control (50 &#181;L water + 50 &#181;L adjusted inoculum 2X RPMI-1640 medium without antifungal), and load into the well plate as described above.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Repeat the procedure for each compound to be tested and the chosen antifungal control (columns 4-10). 
	NOTE: The serial dilutions can be done vertically as the experiment below, or horizontally in the plate (i.e., if the number of dilutions of the given compound/extract that needs to be tested is eight or more).
	<ol>
		<li>If the compounds, reference drugs, or any of its components are photosensitive, perform the assay in reduced light, cover the plates with foil, or place in a dark chamber during incubations.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Consider the following optional recommendations.
	<ol>
		<li>Seal the plate with a clear cover plate that permits gas exchange, as this helps reduce evaporation.</li>
		<li>Place the plate in a humid chamber; it will also help reduce evaporation.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Incubate the plates at 37 &#176;C for 24 h or 48 h for all C. albicans strains, and for 48 h with 200 rpm shaking for C. neoformans. The lower final volume (100 &#181;L) ensures that no spillover occurs. 
	NOTE: No significant difference was observed between MIC readings at 24 h and 48 h for C. albicans strains. Nonetheless, readings at 48 h are easier to visualize.</li>
	<li>Observe all wells, with the assistance of an inverted optical microscope, before the incubation period and after to verify changes in morphology as well as to check for signs of contamination. 
	NOTE: Readings can be done visually and photographed at the end of the experiment. Before each reading, homogenize slightly the plate. The reads can also be performed by measuring its OD at 600 nm, if cell clumps or filamentation are not observed.</li>
	<li>Perform the experiments at least three times on separate dates.</li>
</ol>

<ol>
	<li>Armstrong-James, D., Meintjes, G., Brown, G. D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+neglected+epidemic:+fungal+infections+in+HIV/AIDS.">A neglected epidemic: fungal infections in HIV/AIDS.</a> Trends Microbiol. 22 (3), 120-127 (2014).</li><li>Romani, L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Immunity+to+fungal+infections.">Immunity to fungal infections.</a> Nat Rev Immunol. 11 (4), 275-288 (2011).</li><li>Pfaller, M. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Antifungal+drug+resistance:+mechanisms,+epidemiology,+and+consequences+for+treatment.">Antifungal drug resistance: mechanisms, epidemiology, and consequences for treatment.</a> Am J Med. 125 (1 Suppl), S3-S13 (2012).</li><li>Hancock, R. E., Diamond, G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=The+role+of+cationic+antimicrobial+peptides+in+innate+host+defences.">The role of cationic antimicrobial peptides in innate host defences.</a> Trends Microbiol. 8 (9), 402-410 (2000).</li><li>Wang, Y., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Snake+cathelicidin+from+Bungarus+fasciatus+is+a+potent+peptide+antibiotics.">Snake cathelicidin from Bungarus fasciatus is a potent peptide antibiotics.</a> PLoS One. 3 (9), e3217 (2008).</li><li>Du, Q., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=AaeAP1+and+AaeAP2:+novel+antimicrobial+peptides+from+the+venom+of+the+scorpion,+Androctonus+aeneas:+structural+characterisation,+molecular+cloning+of+biosynthetic+precursor-encoding+cDNAs+and+engineering+of+analogues+with+enhanced+antimicrobial+and+anticancer+activities.">AaeAP1 and AaeAP2: novel antimicrobial peptides from the venom of the scorpion, Androctonus aeneas: structural characterisation, molecular cloning of biosynthetic precursor-encoding cDNAs and engineering of analogues with enhanced antimicrobial and anticancer activities.</a> Toxins (Basel). 7 (2), 219-237 (2015).</li><li>Benincasa, M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Fungicidal+activity+of+five+cathelicidin+peptides+against+clinically+isolated+yeasts.">Fungicidal activity of five cathelicidin peptides against clinically isolated yeasts.</a> J Antimicrob Chemother. 58 (5), 950-959 (2006).</li><li>CLSI. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=.">.</a> Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibiliy Testing of Yeasts; Approved Standard -Third Edition. CLSI document M27-A3. , (2008).</li><li>Guilhelmelli, F., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Activity+of+Scorpion+Venom-Derived+Antifungal+Peptides+against+Planktonic+Cells+of+Candida+spp.+and+Cryptococcus+neoformans+and+Candida+albicans+Biofilms.">Activity of Scorpion Venom-Derived Antifungal Peptides against Planktonic Cells of Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans and Candida albicans Biofilms.</a> Front Microbiol. 7, 1844 (2016).</li><li>Roongruangsree, U. T., Kjerulf-Jensen, C., Olson, L. W., Lange, L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Viability+Tests+for+Thick+Walled+Fungal+Spores+(ex:+Oospores+of+Peronospora+manshurica).">Viability Tests for Thick Walled Fungal Spores (ex: Oospores of Peronospora manshurica).</a> Journal of Phytopathology. 123 (3), 244-252 (1988).</li><li>Boedijn, K. B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Trypan+blue+as+stain+for+fungi.">Trypan blue as stain for fungi.</a> Stain Technol. 31 (3), 115-116 (1956).</li><li>Goihman-Yahr, M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Studies+on+plating+efficiency+and+estimation+of+viability+of+suspensions+of+Paracoccidioides+brasiliensis+yeast+cells.">Studies on plating efficiency and estimation of viability of suspensions of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis yeast cells.</a> Mycopathologia. 71 (2), 73-83 (1980).</li><li>Tati, S., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Histatin+5-spermidine+conjugates+have+enhanced+fungicidal+activity+and+efficacy+as+a+topical+therapeutic+for+oral+candidiasis.">Histatin 5-spermidine conjugates have enhanced fungicidal activity and efficacy as a topical therapeutic for oral candidiasis.</a> Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 58 (2), 756-766 (2014).</li><li>Petrou, M. A., Shanson, D. C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Susceptibility+of+Cryptococcus+neoformans+by+the+NCCLS+microdilution+and+Etest+methods+using+five+defined+media.">Susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans by the NCCLS microdilution and Etest methods using five defined media.</a> J Antimicrob Chemother. 46 (5), 815-818 (2000).</li><li>Zaragoza, O., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Process+analysis+of+variables+for+standardization+of+antifungal+susceptibility+testing+of+nonfermentative+yeasts.">Process analysis of variables for standardization of antifungal susceptibility testing of nonfermentative yeasts.</a> Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 55 (4), 1563-1570 (2011).</li><li>Rodriguez-Tudela, J. L., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Influence+of+shaking+on+antifungal+susceptibility+testing+of+Cryptococcus+neoformans:+a+comparison+of+the+NCCLS+standard+M27A+medium,+buffered+yeast+nitrogen+base,+and+RPMI-2%+glucose.">Influence of shaking on antifungal susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans: a comparison of the NCCLS standard M27A medium, buffered yeast nitrogen base, and RPMI-2% glucose.</a> Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 44 (2), 400-404 (2000).</li><li>Beggs, W. H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Growth+phase+in+relation+to+ketoconazole+and+miconazole+susceptibilities+of+Candida+albicans.">Growth phase in relation to ketoconazole and miconazole susceptibilities of Candida albicans.</a> Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 25 (3), 316-318 (1984).</li><li>Alcouloumre, M. S., Ghannoum, M. A., Ibrahim, A. S., Selsted, M. E., Edwards, J. E. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Fungicidal+properties+of+defensin+NP-1+and+activity+against+Cryptococcus+neoformans+in+vitro.">Fungicidal properties of defensin NP-1 and activity against Cryptococcus neoformans in vitro.</a> Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 37 (12), 2628-2632 (1993).</li></ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Microdilution tests can analyze the potential antifungal activity of a target compound using small quantities of the compound, and at the same time test it in a range of concentrations. Accordingly, this protocol is recommended as a first step in screening for potential new antifungal compounds. The protocol presented here is based on the M27-A3 protocol, initially designed to aid in the selection of antifungal therapy in clinics, and can be adapted to a variety of new antifungal compounds. Overall, this protocol can foc...

Fungal infections have become an important medical concern in recent decades, having considerably increased mainly due to a rise in the number of immunocompromised individuals such as those undergoing cancer treatment and those living with HIV/AIDS or transplanted organs1,2. However, a very limited array of available antifungal drugs and the increasing number of reports on fungal resistance to them contribute to the major problems regarding the therapeutics of systemic mycoses3.
A potential source of new antifungal compounds are antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), small cationic peptides produced by many organisms as part of their innate immune response to infection4. Nevertheless, the screening method to test these compounds against fungal pathogens is not standardized. Different procedures have been used to assess the antifungal activity of AMPs, sometimes for the same model microorganism5,6,7. These differences and the lack of detail in some protocols complicate comparisons between compounds and hampers reproducibility.
One way to standardize the testing of new drug candidates is to follow guidelines used to define antifungal susceptibility in clinical settings, such as the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M27-A3 guidelines. However, these antifungal sensitivity tests are too restrictive, and do not take into consideration variation in metabolism across species, as they were only established for a few select agents. For example, they do not take into account the metabolic needs of non-fermenting yeasts.
This protocol allows the assessment of activity of prospective antifungal compounds, and is implemented here for the search for antifungal peptides. It is based on the broth microdilution susceptibility test from the CLSI M27-A3 guidelines with modifications that optimize the screening of new compounds8,9. These changes allow for the use of small amounts of compound, variations in temperature or initial inoculum, and different media for optimal pre-test growth, while standardizing the results with the use of reference antifungals as controls. This method, with the use of multi-well culture plates, makes it possible to quickly and reliably screen a large number of compounds.
Due to its inherent flexibility, this protocol can be used with different chemical classes of compounds and against other microorganisms, with few adaptations.

<table>
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>Media and Reagents</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>RPMI 1640 medium with l-glutamine, without sodium bicarbonate</td>
			<td>Thermo Fisher</td>
			<td>31800-022</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>3-(N-morpholino) propane sulfonic acid (MOPS) (o que a gente usa tem um s&#243;dio, completa o nome dele please)</td>
			<td>Sigma-Aldrich</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Use to buffer 2X RPMI medium</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Sodium chloride (NaCl)</td>
			<td>Din&#226;mica</td>
			<td>1528-1</td>
			<td>137 mM for Phosphate buffered saline (PBS)</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Potassium chloride (KCl)</td>
			<td>J.T.Baker</td>
			<td>3040-01</td>
			<td>2.7 mM for Phosphate buffered saline (PBS)</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Sodium phosphate dibasic (Na2HPO4)</td>
			<td>Sigma-Aldrich</td>
			<td>V000129</td>
			<td>10 mM for Phosphate buffered saline (PBS)</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4)</td>
			<td>Sigma-Aldrich</td>
			<td>60230</td>
			<td>2 mM for Phosphate buffered saline (PBS)</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>BD Difco Sabouraud dextrose broth</td>
			<td>BD</td>
			<td>238230</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>BD Difco Sabouraud Dextrose Agar</td>
			<td>BD</td>
			<td>210950</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Glycerol</td>
			<td>Sigma-Aldrich</td>
			<td>V000123</td>
			<td>35% for (solu&#231;&#227;o de estoque? Criopreserva&#231;&#227;o?)</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Sterile water</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Para dilui&#231;&#227;o das drogas na dilui&#231;&#227;o seriada</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Antifungal drugs</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Amphotericin B</td>
			<td>Sigma-Aldrich</td>
			<td>A2942</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Fluconazole</td>
			<td>Sigma-Aldrich</td>
			<td>F8929</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Caspofungin</td>
			<td>Sigma-Aldrich</td>
			<td>PHR1160</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Plastics</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>50 mL conical tube</td>
			<td>Sarstedt</td>
			<td>62.547.254</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Dish petri</td>
			<td>J.Prolab</td>
			<td>0304-5</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>96 well plate</td>
			<td>Corning</td>
			<td>3595</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Sterile Solution Reservoir</td>
			<td>KASVI</td>
			<td>K30-208</td>
			<td>Use to pippet the solutions using the multichannel pippet</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Equipment and other materials</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Optical microscope</td>
			<td>Nikon</td>
			<td>E200MV</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Centrifugue</td>
			<td>Thermo Fisher</td>
			<td>MegaFuge 16R</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Incubator</td>
			<td>Ethik Technology</td>
			<td>403-3D</td>
			<td>Set to 37&#176; C</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Shaker</td>
			<td>New Brunswick Scientific</td>
			<td>Excella E25</td>
			<td>Set to 37&#176; C, 200 RPM</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Cell counting chamber, Neubauer</td>
			<td>BOECO Germany</td>
			<td>BOE 13</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Multichannel pipette</td>
			<td>HTL</td>
			<td>5123</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>

broth microdilution in vitro screening: an easy and fast method to detect new antifungal compounds

Fungal infections have become an important medical condition in the last decades, but the number of available antifungal drugs is limited. In this scenario, the search for new antifungal drugs is necessary. The protocol reported here details a method to screen peptides for their antifungal properties. It is based on the broth microdilution susceptibility test from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M27-A3 guidelines with modifications to suit the research of antimicrobial peptides as potential new antifungals. This protocol describes a functional assay to evaluate the activity of antifungal compounds and may be easily modified to suit any particular class of molecules under investigation. Since the assays are performed in 96-well plates using small volumes, a large-scale screening can be completed in a short amount of time, especially if carried out in an automation setting. This procedure illustrates how a standardized and adjustable clinical protocol can help the bench-work pursuit of new molecules to improve the therapy of fungal diseases.

The MIC is defined as the lowest antimicrobial compound concentration that completely inhibits visible fungal growth at the end of the incubation period. Since the objective of this protocol is to have a fast method to screen potential antifungals, any well with clear media similar to the blank wells is considered a positive result, whereas any well with turbidity analogous to the negative/growth control wells is considered negative. However, if there is an interest in knowing whether a g...

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Broth Microdilution In Vitro Screening: An Easy and Fast Method to Detect New Antifungal Compounds at JoVE.com

Broth Microdilution In Vitro Screening: An Easy and Fast Method to Detect New Antifungal Compounds

An easy and adaptable broth microdilution method for screening antifungal compounds and extracts.

Broth Microdilution In Vitro Screening: An Easy and Fast Method to Detect New Antifungal Compounds

Fungal infections have become an important medical condition in the last decades, but the number of available antifungal drugs is limited. In this ...

broth-microdilution-vitro-screening-an-easy-fast-method-to-detect-new

Research

JoVE Journal

Biology

18.7K Views.  University of Brasília. An easy and adaptable broth microdilution method for screening antifungal compounds and extracts.

Video: Broth Microdilution In Vitro Screening: An Easy and Fast Method to Detect New Antifungal Compounds

Using Laser Tweezers For Manipulating Isolated Neurons In Vitro

In this paper and video, we describe the protocols used in our laboratory to study the targeting preferences of regenerating cell processes of adult retinal neurons in vitro. Procedures for preparing retinal cell cultures start with the dissection, digestion and trituration of the retina, and end with the plating of isolated retinal cells on dishes made especially for use with laser tweezers. These dishes are divided into a cell adhesive half and a cell repellant half. The cell adhesive side is coated with a layer of Sal-1 antibodies, which provide a substrate upon which our cells grow. Other adhesive substrates could be used for other cell types. The cell repellant side is coated with a thin layer of poly-HEMA. The cells plated on the poly-HEMA side of the dish are trapped with the laser tweezers, transported and then placed adjacent to a cell on the Sal-1 side to create a pair. Formation of cell groups of any size should be possible with this technique. "Laser-tweezers-controlled micromanipulation" means that the investigator can choose which cells to move, and the desired distance between the cells can be standardized. Because the laser beam goes through transparent surfaces of the culture dish, cell selection and placement are done in an enclosed, sterile environment. Cells can be monitored by video time-lapse and used with any cell biological technique required. This technique may help investigations of cell-cell interactions.

This video describes the manipulation of cultured neurons using laser tweezers in vitro.

In this paper and video, we describe the protocols used in our laboratory to study the targeting preferences of regenerating cell processes of adult ...

Protein Membrane Overlay Assay: A Protocol to Test Interaction Between Soluble and Insoluble Proteins in vitro

Validating interactions between different proteins is vital for investigation of their biological functions on the molecular level. There are several methods, both in vitro and in vivo, to evaluate protein binding, and at least two methods that complement the shortcomings of each other should be conducted to obtain reliable insights. 
For an in vivo assay, the bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assay represents the most popular and least invasive approach that enables to detect protein-protein interaction within living cells, as well as identify the intracellular localization of the interacting proteins 1,2. In this assay, non-fluorescent N- and C-terminal halves of GFP or its variants are fused to tested proteins, and when the two fusion proteins are brought together due to the tested proteins&#x2019; interactions, the fluorescent signal is reconstituted3-6. Because its signal is readily detectable by epifluorescence or confocal microscopy, BiFC has emerged as a powerful tool of choice among cell biologists for studying about protein-protein interactions in living cells 3. This assay, however, can sometimes produce false positive results. For example, the fluorescent signal can be reconstituted by two GFP fragments arranged as far as 7 nm from each other due to close packing in a small subcellular compartment, rather that due to specific interactions7.
Due to these limitations, the results obtained from live cell imaging technologies should be confirmed by an independent approach based on a different principle for detecting protein interactions. Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) or glutathione transferase (GST) pull-down assays represent such alternative methods that are commonly used to analyze protein-protein interactions in vitro. However, iIn these assays, however, the tested proteins must be readily soluble in the buffer that supportsused for the binding reaction. Therefore, specific interactions involving an insoluble protein cannot be assessed by these techniques.
 Here, we illustrate the protocol for the protein membrane overlay binding assay, which circumvents this difficulty. In this technique, interaction between soluble and insoluble proteins can be reliably tested because one of the proteins is immobilized on a membrane matrix. This method, in combination with in vivo experiments, such as BiFC, provides a reliable approach to investigate and characterize interactions faithfully between soluble and insoluble proteins. In this article, binding between Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) movement protein (MP), which exerts multiple functions during viral cell-to-cell transport8-14, and a recently identified plant cellular interactor, tobacco ankyrin repeat-containing protein (ANK) 15, is demonstrated using this technique.

Protein Membrane Overlay Assay: A Protocol to Test Interaction Between Soluble and Insoluble Proteins in vitro

Testing protein-protein interaction is indispensable for dissection of protein functionality. Here, we introduce an in vitro protein-protein binding assay to probe a membrane-immobilized protein with a soluble protein. This assay provides a reliable method to test interaction between an insoluble protein and a protein in solution.

Validating interactions between different proteins is vital for investigation of their biological functions on the molecular level.  There are several ...

Measuring Fast Calcium Fluxes in Cardiomyocytes

Cardiomyocytes have multiple Ca2+ fluxes of varying duration that work together to optimize function 1,2. Changes in Ca2+ activity in response to extracellular agents is predominantly regulated by the phospholipase C&beta;- G&alpha;q pathway localized on the plasma membrane which is stimulated by agents such as acetylcholine 3,4. We have recently found that plasma membrane protein domains called caveolae5,6 can entrap activated G&alpha;q 7. This entrapment has the effect of stabilizing the activated state of G&alpha;q and resulting in prolonged Ca2+ signals in cardiomyocytes and other cell types8. We uncovered this surprising result by measuring dynamic calcium responses on a fast scale in living cardiomyocytes. Briefly, cells are loaded with a fluorescent Ca2+ indicator. In our studies, we used Ca2+ Green (Invitrogen, Inc.) which exhibits an increase in fluorescence emission intensity upon binding of calcium ions. The fluorescence intensity is then recorded for using a line-scan mode of a laser scanning confocal microscope. This method allows rapid acquisition of the time course of fluorescence intensity in pixels along a selected line, producing several hundreds of time traces on the microsecond time scale. These very fast traces are transferred into excel and then into Sigmaplot for analysis, and are compared to traces obtained for electronic noise, free dye, and other controls. To dissect Ca2+ responses of different flux rates, we performed a histogram analysis that binned pixel intensities with time. Binning allows us to group over 500 traces of scans and visualize the compiled results spatially and temporally on a single plot. Thus, the slow Ca2+ waves that are difficult to discern when the scans are overlaid due to different peak placement and noise, can be readily seen in the binned histograms. Very fast fluxes in the time scale of the measurement show a narrow distribution of intensities in the very short time bins whereas longer Ca2+ waves show binned data with a broad distribution over longer time bins. These different time distributions allow us to dissect the timing of Ca2+fluxes in the cells, and to determine their impact on various cellular events.

We present a method to isolate rapid (microsecond) calcium events from slower fluxes in living cells using laser scanning confocal microscopy. The method measures fluorescence intensity fluctuations of calcium indicators by recording line scans of several hundred pixels in a cell. Histogram analysis allows us to isolate the time scales of different calcium fluxes.

Cardiomyocytes have multiple Ca2+ fluxes of varying duration that work together to optimize function 1,2. Changes in Ca2+ activity in response to ...

In vitro Transcription and Capping of Gaussia Luciferase mRNA Followed by HeLa Cell Transfection

In vitro transcription is the synthesis of RNA transcripts by RNA polymerase from a linear DNA template containing the corresponding promoter sequence (T7, T3, SP6) and the gene to be transcribed (Figure 1A). A typical transcription reaction consists of the template DNA, RNA polymerase, ribonucleotide triphosphates, RNase inhibitor and buffer containing Mg2+ ions.
Large amounts of high quality RNA are often required for a variety of applications. Use of in vitro transcription has been reported for RNA structure and function studies such as splicing1, RNAi experiments in mammalian cells2, antisense RNA amplification by the "Eberwine method"3, microarray analysis4 and for RNA vaccine studies5. The technique can also be used for producing radiolabeled and dye labeled probes6. Warren, et al. recently reported reprogramming of human cells by transfection with in vitro transcribed capped RNA7. The T7 High Yield RNA Synthesis Kit from New England Biolabs has been designed to synthesize up to 180 &mu;g RNA per 20 &mu;l reaction. RNA of length up to 10kb has been successfully transcribed using this kit. Linearized plasmid DNA, PCR products and synthetic DNA oligonucleotides can be used as templates for transcription as long as they have the T7 promoter sequence upstream of the gene to be transcribed.
Addition of a 5' end cap structure to the RNA is an important process in eukaryotes. It is essential for RNA stability8, efficient translation9, nuclear transport10 and splicing11. The process involves addition of a 7-methylguanosine cap at the 5' triphosphate end of the RNA. RNA capping can be carried out post-transcriptionally using capping enzymes or co-transcriptionally using cap analogs. In the enzymatic method, the mRNA is capped using the Vaccinia virus capping enzyme12,13. The enzyme adds on a 7-methylguanosine cap at the 5' end of the RNA using GTP and S-adenosyl methionine as donors (cap 0 structure). Both methods yield functionally active capped RNA suitable for transfection or other applications14 such as generating viral genomic RNA for reverse-genetic systems15 and crystallographic studies of cap binding proteins such as eIF4E16.
In the method described below, the T7 High Yield RNA Synthesis Kit from NEB is used to synthesize capped and uncapped RNA transcripts of Gaussia luciferase (GLuc) and Cypridina luciferase (CLuc). A portion of the uncapped GLuc RNA is capped using the Vaccinia Capping System (NEB). A linearized plasmid containing the GLuc or CLuc gene and T7 promoter is used as the template DNA. The transcribed RNA is transfected into HeLa cells and cell culture supernatants are assayed for luciferase activity. Capped CLuc RNA is used as the internal control to normalize GLuc expression.

In vitro Transcription and Capping of Gaussia Luciferase mRNA Followed by HeLa Cell Transfection

This method describes high yield in vitro synthesis of both capped and uncapped mRNA from a linearized plasmid containing the Gaussia luciferase (GLuc) gene. The RNA is purified and a fraction of the uncapped RNA is enzymatically capped using the Vaccinia virus capping enzyme. In the final step, the mRNA is transfected into HeLa cells and cell culture supernatants are assayed for luciferase activity.

In vitro transcription is the synthesis of RNA transcripts by RNA polymerase from a linear DNA template containing the corresponding promoter sequence ...

Construction of an Affordable and Easy-to-Build Zebrafish Facility

In vivo biomedical research is pivotal to translate in vitro findings into clinical advances. Small academic institutions with limited resources find it virtually impossible to build and maintain typical rodent facilities for research. Zebrafish research has been demonstrated to be a valuable alternative for in vivo research in pharmacology, physiology, development and genetic studies. This article demonstrates that a functional zebrafish facility can be built in an easy and affordable manner. We demonstrate that such a facility could be built in about one working day with minimal tools and expertise. The cost of the 27 1.8 L fish tank zebrafish facility constructed in this study was approximately $1,500. We estimate that the maintenance of an initial working 150 fish colony for 3 months is $1,000. This project involved students, who were introduced to aquaculturing of zebrafish for research proposes.

A Zebrafish facility suitable for breeding and in vivo research is built in an easy and affordable manner. Maintenance is minimal. This facility is ideal for student involvement and independent research.

In vivo biomedical research is pivotal to translate in vitro findings into clinical advances. Small academic institutions with limited resources find it ...

A Fast Air-dry Dropping Chromosome Preparation Method Suitable for FISH in Plants

Preparation of chromosome spreads is a prerequisite for the successful performance of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Preparation of high quality plant chromosome spreads is challenging due to the rigid cell wall. One of the approved methods for the preparation of plant chromosomes is a so-called drop preparation, also known as drop-spreading or air-drying technique. Here, we present a protocol for the fast preparation of mitotic chromosome spreads suitable for the FISH detection of single and high copy DNA probes. This method is an improved variant of the air-dry drop method performed under a relative humidity of 50%-55%. This protocol comprises a reduced number of washing steps making its application easy, efficient and reproducible. Obvious benefits of this approach are well-spread, undamaged and numerous metaphase chromosomes serving as a perfect prerequisite for successful FISH analysis. Using this protocol we obtained high-quality chromosome spreads and reproducible FISH results for Hordeum vulgare, H. bulbosum, H. marinum, H. murinum, H. pubiflorum and Secale cereale.

A protocol is described for the preparation of high-quality mitotic plant chromosome spreads by a fast air-dry dropping method suitable for the FISH detection of single and high copy DNA probes.

Preparation of chromosome spreads is a prerequisite for the successful performance of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Preparation of high ...

Directed Evolution Method in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Mutant Library Creation and Screening

Directed evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae offers many attractive advantages when designing enzymes for biotechnological applications, a process that involves the construction, cloning and expression of mutant libraries, coupled to high frequency homologous DNA recombination in vivo. Here, we present a protocol to create and screen mutant libraries in yeast based on the example of a fungal aryl-alcohol oxidase (AAO) to enhance its total activity. Two protein segments were subjected to focused-directed evolution by random mutagenesis and in vivo DNA recombination. Overhangs of ~50 bp flanking each segment allowed the correct reassembly of the AAO-fusion gene in a linearized vector giving rise to a full autonomously replicating plasmid. Mutant libraries enriched with functional AAO variants were screened in S. cerevisiae supernatants with a sensitive high-throughput assay based on the Fenton reaction. The general process of library construction in S. cerevisiae described here can be readily applied to evolve many other eukaryotic genes, avoiding extra PCR reactions, in vitro DNA recombination and ligation steps.

Directed Evolution Method in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Mutant Library Creation and Screening

We present a detailed protocol to construct and screen mutant libraries for directed evolution campaigns in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Directed evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae offers many attractive advantages when designing enzymes for biotechnological applications, a process that ...

An Easy Method for Plant Polysome Profiling

Translation of mRNA to protein is a fundamental and highly regulated biological process. Polysome profiling is considered as a gold standard for the analysis of translational regulation. The method described here is an easy and economical way for fractionating polysomes from various plant tissues. A sucrose gradient is made without the need for a gradient maker by sequentially freezing each layer. Cytosolic extracts are then prepared in a buffer containing cycloheximide and chloramphenicol to immobilize the cytosolic and chloroplastic ribosomes to mRNA and are loaded onto the sucrose gradient. After centrifugation, six fractions are directly collected from the bottom to the top of the gradient, without piercing the ultracentrifugation tube. During collection, the absorbance at 260 nm is read continuously to generate a polysome profile that gives a snapshot of global translational activity. Fractions are then pooled to prepare three different mRNA populations: the polysomes, mRNAs bound to several ribosomes; the monosomes, mRNAs bound to one ribosome; and mRNAs that are not bound to ribosomes. mRNAs are then extracted. This protocol has been validated for different plants and tissues including Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings and adult plants, Nicotiana benthamiana, Solanum lycopersicum, and Oryza sativa leaves.

This protocol describes an easy method to extract and fractionate transcripts from plant tissues on the basis of the number of bound ribosomes. It allows a global estimate of translation activity and the determination of the translational status of specific mRNAs.

Translation of mRNA to protein is a fundamental and highly regulated biological process. Polysome profiling is considered as a gold standard for the ...

Gap Junctional Intercellular Communication: A Functional Biomarker to Assess Adverse Effects of Toxicants and Toxins, and Health Benefits of Natural Products

This protocol describes a scalpel loading-fluorescent dye transfer (SL-DT) technique that measures intercellular communication through gap junction channels, which is a major intercellular process by which tissue homeostasis is maintained. Interruption of gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) by toxicants, toxins, drugs, etc. has been linked to numerous adverse health effects. Many genetic-based human diseases have been linked to mutations in gap junction genes. The SL-DT technique is a simple functional assay for the simultaneous assessment of GJIC in a large population of cells. The assay involves pre-loading cells with a fluorescent dye by briefly perturbing the cell membrane with a scalpel blade through a population of cells. The fluorescent dye is then allowed to traverse through gap junction channels to neighboring cells for a designated time. The assay is then terminated by the addition of formalin to the cells. The spread of the fluorescent dye through a population of cells is assessed with an epifluorescence microscope and the images are analyzed with any number of morphometric software packages that are available, including free software packages found on the public domain. This assay has also been adapted for in vivo studies using tissue slices from various organs from treated animals. Overall, the SL-DT assay can serve a broad range of in vitro pharmacological and toxicological needs, and can be potentially adapted for high throughput set-up systems with automated fluorescence microscopy imaging and analysis to elucidate more samples in a shorter time.

This protocol describes a scalpel loading-fluorescent dye transfer technique that measures intercellular communication through gap junction channels. Gap junctional intercellular communication is a major cellular process by which tissue homeostasis is maintained and disruption of this cell signaling has adverse health effects.

This protocol describes a scalpel loading-fluorescent dye transfer (SL-DT) technique that measures intercellular communication through gap junction ...

An Easy and Flexible Inoculation Method for Accurately Assessing Powdery Mildew-Infection Phenotypes of Arabidopsis and Other Plants

Reducing crop losses due to fungal diseases requires improved understanding of the mechanisms governing plant immunity and fungal pathogenesis, which in turn requires accurate determination of disease phenotypes of plants upon infection with a particular fungal pathogen. However, accurate disease phenotyping with unculturable biotrophic fungal pathogens such as powdery mildew is not easy to achieve and can be a rate-limiting step of a research project. Here, we have developed a safe, efficient, and easy-to-operate disease phenotyping system using the Arabidopsis-powdery mildew interaction as an example. This system mainly consists of three components: (i) a wooden inoculation box fitted with a removable lid mounted with a stainless steel or nylon mesh of ~50 &#181;m pores for inoculating a flat of plants with fungal spores, (ii) a transparent plastic chamber with a small front opening for minimizing spore escape while conducting inoculation inside, and (iii) a spore-dislodging and distribution method for even and effective inoculation. The protocols described here include the steps and parameters for making the inoculation box and the plastic chamber at a low cost, and a video demonstration of how to use the system to enable even inoculation with powdery mildew spores, thereby improving accuracy and reproducibility of disease phenotyping.

We present a protocol for constructing a simple spore-distribution system consisting of an inoculation box with a ~50 &#181;m mesh and a transparent plastic chamber. This can be used to evenly inoculate plants with powdery mildew spores, thereby enabling accurate and reproducible assessment of disease phenotypes of plants under study.

Reducing crop losses due to fungal diseases requires improved understanding of the mechanisms governing plant immunity and fungal pathogenesis, which in ...