Method Article
* These authors contributed equally
The goals of the protocol are to use this approach to 1) understand the role of the immunosuppressive gastric tumor microenvironment and 2) predict the efficacy of patient response, thus increasing the survival rate of patients.
Tumors expressing programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) interact with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) on CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) to evade immune surveillance leading to the inhibition of CTL proliferation, survival, and effector function, and subsequently cancer persistence. Approximately 40% of gastric cancers express PD-L1, yet the response rate to immunotherapy is only 30%. We present the use of human-derived autologous gastric cancer organoid/immune cell co-culture as a preclinical model that may predict the efficacy of targeted therapies to improve the outcome of cancer patients. Although cancer organoid co-cultures with immune cells have been reported, this co-culture approach uses tumor antigen to pulse the antigen-presenting dendritic cells. Dendritic cells (DCs) are then cultured with the patient's CD8+ T cells to expand the cytolytic activity and proliferation of these T lymphocytes before co-culture. In addition, the differentiation and immunosuppressive function of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in culture are investigated within this co-culture system. This organoid approach may be of broad interest and appropriate to predict the efficacy of therapy and patient outcome in other cancers, including pancreatic cancer.
Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide 1. The effective diagnosis and treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) have resulted in a low incidence of gastric cancer in the United States 2. However, the 5-year survival rate for patients diagnosed with this malignancy is only 29%, making gastric cancer an important medical challenge3. The purpose of the methods presented here is to develop an approach to predict immunotherapy responses in individual patients accurately. Solid tumors consist of cancer cells and various types of stromal, endothelial, and hematopoietic cells, including macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and lymphocytes (reviewed in 4,5). Interactions between cancer stem cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME) substantially impact tumor characteristics and the response of the patient to treatment. This approach strives to allow investigators to acquire knowledge for preclinical drug development and biomarker discovery for the personalized treatment of gastric cancer.
The method presented here uses human-derived autologous organoid/immune cell co-cultures generated from gastric cancer patients to understand the immunosuppressive role of the MDSCs. Presented is a preclinical model that may predict the efficacy of targeted therapies to improve the survival of patients. Cancer organoid co-cultures with immune cells have been extensively reported in the pancreatic cancer field6,7,8,9,10. However, such co-cultures have not been reported to study gastric cancer. Overall, this method demonstrates the co-culturing of autologous human-derived immune cells within the same matrix environment as the cancer organoids, thus allowing the immune cells to be in contact with the target organoids.
The study by Tiriac et al.10 reported that patient-derived pancreatic cancer organoids, which exhibited heterogeneous responses to standard-of-care chemotherapeutics, could be grouped into organoid-based gene expression signatures of chemosensitivity that could predict improved patient responses to chemotherapy. The investigators proposed that combined molecular and therapeutic profiling of pancreatic cancer organoids may predict clinical response10. Co-clinical trial data from Yao et al.11 also showed that rectal cancer-derived organoids represent similar pathophysiology and genetic changes similar to the patient tumor tissues in response to chemoradiation. Thus, it is fundamental for organoid cultures to be used in the context of the patient's immune cells and tumor immune phenotype when using these cultures as predictive models for therapy.
Tumors expressing PD-L1 that interact with PD-1 inhibit CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte proliferation, survival, and effector function 12,13,14. While approximately 40% of gastric cancers express PD-L1, only 30% of these patients respond to immunotherapy15,16,17. Anti-PD1 antibodies are used in clinical trials for gastric cancer treatment18,19,20. However, there are currently no preclinical models that allow testing of therapeutic efficacy for each patient. Optimizing the organoid culture such that the patient's immune cells are included in the system would potentially allow for the individualized identification of the efficacy of immunotherapy.
Approval was obtained for the collection of human-biopsied tissues from patient tumors (1912208231R001, University of Arizona Human Subjects Protection Program; IRB protocol number: 1099985869R001 , University of Arizona Human Subjects Protection Program TARGHETS).
1. Establishing patient-derived gastric organoids from biopsies
2. Establishing patient-derived gastric organoids from surgical specimens
3. Maintenance and expansion of organoid cultures
NOTE : All procedures should be conducted in an aseptic environment using sterile materials and reagents.
4. Culturing immune cells from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)
NOTE: All procedures should be conducted in an aseptic environment using sterile materials and reagents.
5. Establishing organoid/immune cell co-cultures
When completed, gastric organoids appear as spheres within the well, typically within 2-4 days post embedding (Figure 1). Figure 1A demonstrates a thriving gastric organoid culture that exhibits a regular membrane. Tumor organoids will often exhibit a divergent morphology that is unique to the patient sample. Unsuccessful cultures will appear dense or not exhibit any growth from the initial digestion of tissue (Figure 1B). Cultures that are robust and actively growing will be successfully passaged and expanded as detailed in the protocol. We have often observed the migration and attachment of a subpopulation of cells to the base of the culture plate (Figure 1C). Following the protocol, these attached cells may be passaged and expanded onto gelatin-coated cell culture plates (Figure 1D).
Figure 1: Gastric organoids derived from biopsies. Representative images of (A) a robust gastric organoid culture and (B) an unhealthy culture of dying organoids. (C) Gastric cells often migrate and attach to the base of the culture dish. (D) These gastric cells may be passaged. Scale bars = 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
This protocol describes a method to culture DCs, MDSCs, and CTLs from patient PBMCs. Figure 2 represents the morphology of the immune cell cultures derived from PBMCs. DCs in culture exhibited an irregular shape with extensive and elongated dendritic processes (Figure 2A). MDSCs appear as typically large mononuclear cells with basophilic, granular cytoplasm (Figure 2B). The morphology of CTLs in culture is shown in Figure 2C. Granulocytic MDSCs may be further characterized by flow cytometry using a gating strategy identifying HLA-DR/CD14-, CD33/CD11b/CD15+ cells.
Figure 2: Human immune cells cultured from PBMCs. Representative light micrographs of (A) dendritic cells before and after the maturation protocol, (B) myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and (C) cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Scale bars = 100 µm. (D) Representative flow cytometric contour plots demonstrating immune cell markers. Abbreviations: PBMCs = peripheral blood mononuclear cells; DCs = dendritic cells; MDSCs = myeloid-derived suppressor cells; CTLs = cytotoxic T lymphocytes; APC = allophycocyanin; CD = cluster of differentiation; PE = phycoerythrin; H = height of peak; W = width of peak; PerCP = Peridinin-chlorophyll-protein; DAPI = 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; FITC = fluorescein isothiocyanate. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Immunofluorescence of the organoid/immune cell co-culture demonstrates the presence of CTLs (CD8+, green) with tumor organoids (PD-L1+, red) (Figure 3A-D). A three-dimensionally rendered image is shown in Video 1. Time-lapse microscopy demonstrates the migration of MDSCs and CTLs towards the gastric organoids (Video 2) and organoid death in cultures treated with a checkpoint inhibitor (Video 3).
Figure 3: Gastric cancer organoid/immune cell co-cultures. Immunofluorescence staining of a representative organoid/immune cell co-culture showing the expression of (A) CD8+ (green), (B) PD-L1 (red), and (C) Hoechst (blue)-stained cells. A merged image is shown in (D). (E) Immunofluorescence staining of a representative organoid/immune cell co-culture showing the expression of MDSCs (CD11b, green) and E cadherin (red). Scale bars = 50 µm. Abbreviations: CD = cluster of differentiation; PD-L1 = programmed cell death-ligand 1; MDSCs = myeloid-derived suppressor cells; Hoechst = Hoechst 33258. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Video 1: A three-dimensional, rendered image of gastric cancer organoid/immune cell co-culture containing PD-L1+ tumor cells (red) and CD8+ lymphocytes (green). Please click here to download this Video.
Video 2: Time-lapse microscopy of organoid/immune cell co-culture resistant to checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Please click here to download this Video.
Video 3: Time-lapse microscopy of organoid/immune cell co-culture sensitive to checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Please click here to download this Video.
Table 1: Composition of media and solutions. Please click here to download this Table.
We present the use of human-derived autologous gastric cancer organoid/immune cell co-culture that may be used as a preclinical model to predict the efficacy of targeted therapies to ultimately improve treatment outcome and patient prognosis. Although cancer organoid co-cultures with immune cells have been reported, this is the first report of such a co-culture system for the study of gastric cancer. Numerous other organoid-based patient profiling efforts are well-developed at multiple institutions, including co-culture models. There are three major co-culture systems, to our knowledge, that have been developed, which have the following features: 1) Pancreatic cancer organoids co-cultured with immune cells outside of the basement membrane matrix dome6. Immune/tumor cell adhesion would be important in a system studying the interaction between PD-L1 and PD-1. 2) Autologous non-small-cell lung and colorectal cancer organoid/peripheral blood lymphocyte co-cultures21.
All the experiments performed in this study were conducted using anti-CD28-coated plates to activate T cells, and co-cultures were performed in the presence of interleukin (IL)-2 to maintain T cell proliferation. Although all in vitro cultures have limitations and do not entirely represent physiological conditions, CD8+ T cells in these cultures are activated using the patient's tumor antigen and dendritic antigen-presenting cells to activate the T cells. This approach may be considered closer to what occurs within the TME. 3) The air-liquid interface (ALI) method to propagate patient-derived organoids22. The investigators state that organoids were passaged every 14-30 days, and in some cases, the medium was supplemented with recombinant human IL-2. First, cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocyte maintenance and expansion requires more than simply adding IL-2 to the media ex vivo. Second, for long-term culture of CD8+ T cells, an initial CD3/CD28 followed by maintenance in IL-2 for 2-3 weeks is required. This may be considered an artificial approach to T cell activation and not relevant within the TME.
The current limitations of tumor tissue-derived organoid cultures warranted the refinement of these cultures with immune cells. For example, the likelihood of tumor invasion is increased significantly in patients exhibiting a dense stromal compartment, such as that observed in invasive gastric cancer23. Thus, it may be difficult for the isolation and organoid culture of immune cells from native patient tumor tissue with a dense stromal compartment, especially in patients with poor prognosis. Importantly, published RNA sequencing data have shown that although there is a phenotypical similarity between the organoids and the patient's tumor tissue, the immune compartment is essentially missing24. Thus, a limitation of the current organoid and cell line cultures is the lack of the immune component found within the patient's TME.
Critical steps in the protocol include the generation of a robust organoid culture and immune cells. The most common problem observed with the patient-derived organoid cultures is bacterial or fungal contamination. Thus, it is also critical to include antifungal agents and antibiotics when washing the tissue before digestion. There are also limitations of the culture that will be addressed in future experiments. First, the heterogeneity of the organoid cultures may be considered a limitation when investigating the specific cell population that immunotherapies and chemotherapies are targeting. It is often difficult to determine from these cultures whether a single organoid is clonal and derived from a single cell. A future approach may be to use a single-cell analytical approach to complement in vitro experiments that test targeted therapies. Second, the heterogeneity of the cells within the culture may not reflect the patient's exact tumor microenvironment. The complexity of these cultures can be increased by incorporating additional fundamental cells, including macrophages and cancer-associated fibroblasts. However, organoid/immune cell co-culture has been used here to investigate a focused research question regarding the fundamental tumor and immune cell interactions relevant to the role of MDSCs as immunosuppressive cells. Third, samples are collected from the primary tumor site. The tissue is collected based on the decision of the pathologist. Future research will be focused on organoids derived from metastatic sites, which may allow us to decipher the differences in the cancer organoids based on the location from where the tissue was collected. Overall, this culture system may be of broad interest and appropriate to predict the efficacy of therapy and patient outcome in other gastrointestinal cancers, including the colon and the pancreas.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by NIH (NIAID) 5U19AI11649105 (PIs: Weiss and Wells, Project Leader 1: Zavros) and NIH (NIDDK) 2 R01 DK083402-06A1 (PI: Zavros) grant. This project was supported in part by PHS Grant P30 DK078392 (Integrative Morphology Core) of the Digestive Diseases Research Core Center in Cincinnati and 5P30CA023074 UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA CANCER CENTER – CANCER CENTER SUPPORT GRANT (PI: Sweasy). We would like to acknowledge the assistance of Chet Closson (Live Microscopy Core, University of Cincinnati) and past members of the Zavros laboratory, Drs. Nina Steele and Loryn Holokai, for their contribution to the development of the organoid culture system. We sincerely thank the patients who consented to donate tissue and blood for the development of the gastric organoid/immune cell co-cultures. Without their willingness to participate in the study, this work would not be possible.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
12 well plate | Midwest Scientific | 92012 | |
15 mL Falcon tube | Fisher scientific | 12-565-269 | |
24 well plate | Midwest Scientific | 92024 | |
30 μm filters | Miltenyi Biotec | 130-041-407 | |
40 μm filters (Fisher Scientific) | Fisher scientific | 352340 | |
5 mL round bottom polystyrene tubes | Fisher scientific | 14956-3C | |
50 mL Falcon tube | Fisher scientific | 12-565-271 | |
Advanced DMEM/F12 | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 12634010 | |
AIMV | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 12055091 | Basal medium for PBMCs and DCs |
Amphotericin B/ Gentamicin | Thermo Fisher Scientific | R-01510 | |
B-27 supplement | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 12587010 | |
β-mercaptoethanol | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 800-120 | |
Bone morphogenetic protein inhibitor (Noggin) | Peprotech | 250-38 | |
Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) | Sigma Aldrich | A7906 | |
Cabozantinib | Selleckchem | S1119 | |
Carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE) | Biolegend | 423801 | |
Collagenase A | Sigma Aldrich | C9891 | |
Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS) | Fisher scientific | 14190-144 | cell separation buffer |
EasySep Buffer | Stem Cell Technologies | 20144 | Contains Enrichment Cocktail and Magnetic Particles used in CTL culture |
EasySep Human CD8+ T Cell Enrichment Kit | Stem Cell Technologies | 19053 | cell separation magnet |
EasySep Magnet | Stem Cell Technologies | SN12580 | |
EDTA | Sigma Aldrich | E6758 | |
Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) | Peprotech | 315-09 | |
Farma Series 3 Water Jacketed Incubator | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 4120 | |
Fetal Calf Serum (FCS) | Atlanta Biologicals | SI2450H | |
Fibroblast growth factor 10 (FGF-10) | Peprotech | 100-26 | density gradient medium |
Ficoll-Paque | GE Healthcare | 171440-02 | |
Gastrin 1 | Tocris | 30061 | |
Gelatin | Cell Biologics | 6950 | |
GM-CSF | Thermo Fisher Scientific | PHC6025 | |
Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 14175095 | |
HEPES (2-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazin-1-yl]ethanesulfonic acid) | Fisher scientific | BP299-100 | |
Human Epithelial Cell Basal Medium | Cell Biologics | H6621 | |
human serum AB | Gemini Bioscience | 21985023 | |
Hyaluronidase Type IV-S | Sigma Aldrich | H3884 | |
Insulin-Transferrin-Selenium | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 41400045 | |
Interleukin 1β (IL-1β) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | RIL1BI | |
Interleukin 6 (IL-6) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | RIL6I | |
Interleukin 7 (IL-7) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | RP-8645 | |
Kanamycin | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 11815024 | |
L-glutamine | Fisher scientific | 350-50-061 | basement membrane matrix |
Matrigel (Corning Life Sciences, Corning, NY) | Fisher scientific | CB40230C | |
N-2 supplement | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 17502048 | |
N-acetyl-L-cysteine | Sigma Aldrich | A7250 | |
Nicotinamide (Nicotinamide) | Sigma Aldrich | N0636 | |
PD-L1 inhibitor | Selleckchem | A2002 | |
Penicillin/Streptomycin | Thermo Fisher Scientific | SV3000 | |
Petridish | Fisher scientific | 07-202-030 | |
Potassium chloride (KCl) | Fisher scientific | 18-605-517 | |
Potassium dihydrogenphosphate (KH2PO4) | Fisher scientific | NC0229895 | |
prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) | Sigma Aldrich | P0409 | |
RPMI 1640 | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 11875119 | |
Sodium chloride (NaCl) | Fisher scientific | 18-606-419 | |
Sodium hydrogen phosphate (Na2HPO4) | Fisher scientific | NC0229893 | cell dissociation reagent |
StemPro Accutase solution | Thermo Fisher Scientific | A1110501 | |
Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 7754-BH-005/CF | |
Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | PHC3015 | |
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | RVGEFI | |
Y-27632 ROCK inhibitor | Sigma Aldrich | Y0350 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved