We thank D. B. Peckys for help with the cell culture protocol, F. Weinberg for reviewing the manuscript, T. Trampert for help with the experiments and the figures, S. Smolka for help with the figures, and E. Arzt for his support through INM. This research is funded by Else Kr&#246;ner-Fresenius-Stiftung.

1. Cleaning of microchips and coating with poly-L-lysine (PLL) and fibronectin-like protein (FLP)
<ol>
	<li>Place two microchips with a SiN membrane (2.0 x 2.6 mm) in 50 mL of acetone. Handle the microchips carefully with the flat side facing up. Avoid breaking the edges by using flat-beak tweezers. Avoid touching the top surface of the microchips when handling with tweezers to prevent breakage of the SiN window. 
	NOTE: One may also use polytetrafluoroethylene coated or carbon tip tweezers to prevent damage of the microchips.</li>
	<li>Wash the chips for 2 min by carefully shaking the beaker, watching the microchips do not flip over.</li>
	<li>Transfer the microchips to 50 mL of ethanol and wash for 2 min by carefully shaking the beaker. Ensure that the transfer is quick so that the excess acetone does not dry in.</li>
	<li>Wash the microchips with 50 mL of water for 10 min.</li>
	<li>Dip the microchips in a freshly prepared beaker of 20 mL of ethanol.</li>
	<li>Place microchips onto a cleanroom tissue for drying.</li>
	<li>Plasma clean the microchips with 11.5 sccm O2 and 35 sccm Ar at 70 mTorr and radio frequency (RF)-target of 50 W for 5 min.</li>
	<li>Place the microchips in a laminar flow hood for sterile cell work.</li>
	<li>Prepare a solution of 0.01% PLL in water. Prepare a solution of 15 &#181;g/mL FLP in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).</li>
	<li>Prepare a 24 well plate under the laminar flow hood and fill 5 wells individually with 1 mL of the solutions in the following order: well 1 &#8211; PLL; well 2 &#8211; water; well 3 &#8211; water; well 4 &#8211; FLP; well 5 &#8211; PBS and well 6 &#8211; PBS. 
	NOTE: Conduct washing steps by dipping a microchip into the indicated 24 or 96 well for a few seconds using tweezers. Perform incubation steps by incubating the microchips in the 24 or 96 well in the indicated solution for indicated time and temperature. Transfer the microchips to another well within a few seconds.</li>
	<li>Incubate the microchips in PLL solution for 5 min. Then wash the microchips in water twice.</li>
	<li>Incubate the microchips in FLP for 5 min. Then wash the microchips in PBS twice.</li>
	<li>Transfer both microchips to wells (one for each microchip) of a new 96 well plate prefilled with 50 &#181;L of serum-free medium for cell seeding.</li>
	<li>Incubate the microchips at 37 &#176;C and 5% CO2 until the cell suspension is prepared.</li>
</ol>
2. Seeding cells on SiN membrane microchips
<ol>
	<li>Set up all supplies and equipment in a laminar flow hood to ensure sterile working.</li>
	<li>Wash the breast cancer cell line, SKBR3, in a cell culture flask with growth medium once. Use Dulbecco&#8217;s modified eagle medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), and 1% non-essential amino acids (NEAAs) as growth medium.</li>
	<li>Incubate the cells with 1 mL of the cell detachment solution until the cells detached from the flask.</li>
	<li>Add 5 mL of growth medium to the detached cells in the flask. Transfer this suspension to a centrifuge tube.</li>
	<li>Pipette 20 &#181;L of the cell suspension into a hemocytometer to obtain the cell concentration. Use the following formula. 
	<img alt="Equation 1" src="/files/ftp_upload/61458/61458equ01.jpg" />.</li>
	<li>Prepare a dispersed cell suspension of 2.5 x 105 cells/mL. Calculate the needed amount of the prepared cell suspension by: 
	<img alt="Equation 2" src="/files/ftp_upload/61458/61458equ02.jpg" /> 
	and fill up with growth medium to the desired volume.</li>
	<li>Add 100 &#181;L of the cell suspension to the two wells of a 96 well plate containing the PLL and FLP coated microchips with the SiN membrane facing up and 50 &#181;L of serum-free medium so that each well contains 25,000 cells.</li>
	<li>Incubate the plate at 37 &#176;C and 5% CO2 for 5 min to wait for the cells to attach to the microchip. 
	NOTE: At this point, cells can detach from the microchip because they have not adhered yet.</li>
	<li>Check the density of the cells on the microchip with an inverted microscope. Make sure cells cover the window with sufficient space to flatten out and adhere (see Figure 1A). 
	NOTE: More cells can be added at this point if necessary.</li>
	<li>Transfer the microchips into new wells containing 200 &#181;L of growth medium and incubate at 37 &#176;C and 5% CO2 overnight.</li>
	<li>In the afternoon of the next day, transfer both microchips to serum-free medium (serum starvation medium) if cells have flattened out and adhered to a visually inspected confluency (i.e., the fraction of the window area covered with cells) of about 2/3 (see Figure 1B). Change to serum-free medium as needed to bring the cells in a defined starting condition as needed for comparison between different experiments25.</li>
	<li>Incubate at 37 &#176;C and 5% CO2 overnight. 
	NOTE: Be aware that cell amounts may differ according to growth rates and cell morphology for other cell lines.</li>
</ol>
3. HER2 labeling and fixation
<ol>
	<li>Prepare the solutions as described in Supplementary Table 1.
	<ol>
		<li>Work under the laminar flow hood to ensure sterile working. Use a 96 well plate referred to as labeling plate I, and fill 6 wells per microchip with 200 &#181;L of the labeling plate I solutions: PBS/BSA, PBS/BSA/GS, antibody mimetic, PBS/BSA, PBS/BSA, PBS/BSA. Use one row (one letter per row, e.g., A1 to A6) of the well plate per microchip. Warm the labeling plate to 37 &#176;C.</li>
		<li>Under a fume hood, prepare a 24 well plate referred to as fixation plate, and fill 8 wells per microchip with 500 &#181;L of the fixation plate solutions: CB, FA, CB, PBS, PBS, PBS, PBS/glycine, PBS/BSA. 
		CAUTION: CB is acutely toxic by inhalation or oral ingestion and is hazardous to waters. Work under the fume hood with appropriate protection and dispose CB according to the safety data sheet (SDS). FA is corrosive and harmful for skin and health. Work under the fume hood and refer to the SDS for information about handling and disposal.</li>
		<li>Prepare a 96 well plate referred to as labeling plate II and fill 4 wells per microchip with 200 &#181;L of the labeling plate II solutions: QDs, PBS/BSA, PBS/BSA, PBS/BSA. 
		NOTE: Here, a 24 well plate is used to better see the microchips in the wells. To use less antibody mimetic (step 3.2) and QDs (step 3.4), use 96 well plates for these steps.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Label HER2 in the cells.
	<ol>
		<li>Once these plates are ready, start labeling by placing the microchips into the wells of the first row of labeling plate 1.</li>
		<li>Wash the microchips with PBS/BSA in the 96 well plate marked as labeling plate I.</li>
		<li>Block unspecific sites to prevent unspecific binding of the antibody mimetic by incubating with PBS/BSA/GS for 5 min at 37 &#176;C and 5% CO2.</li>
		<li>Incubate with 200 nM antibody mimetic for 10 min at 37 &#176;C and 5% CO2.</li>
		<li>Wash microchip three times in PBS/BSA.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Fix the cells.
	<ol>
		<li>Transfer the microchips to the 24 well fixation plate in the fume hood. 
		NOTE: No sterile work is needed from here.</li>
		<li>Wash once with CB for a few seconds.</li>
		<li>Fix cells with 3% FA for 10 min.</li>
		<li>Wash once with CB and three times with PBS.</li>
		<li>Block free aldehyde groups of FA by incubating with PBS-glycine for 2 min.</li>
		<li>Wash microchips with PBS-BSA once.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Attach the QDs.
	<ol>
		<li>Move the microchips to the 96 well labeling plate II.</li>
		<li>Incubate with 20 nM QDs for 12 min.</li>
		<li>Wash the microchips with PBS/BSA twice.</li>
		<li>Store the microchips in a well containing PBS/BSA.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
4. Light microscopy of the fixed cells
<ol>
	<li>Prepare a 3.5 cm diameter glass bottom dish with 2 mL of PBS/BSA solution.</li>
	<li>Take the first microchips, place it upside down (cells facing down) into the glass bottom dish and place the dish in the fluorescence microscope. Lower the microchip slowly into the liquid to prevent damage on the cells.</li>
	<li>Acquire differential interference contrast (DIC) and fluorescence images of every microchip with a 40x objective and the appropriate fluorescence channel. 
	NOTE: Here, an excitation wavelength of 540-580 nm and an emitting wavelength of 607-683 nm is used to detect QD655.</li>
	<li>Repeat the procedure for the second microchip.</li>
</ol>
5. Post-fixation
<ol>
	<li>Perform all steps under the fume hood.</li>
	<li>Fill 6 wells per microchip of a 96 well plate with 200 &#181;L of the post-fixation solutions: 
	CB, GA, CB, PBS, PBS, PBS. 
	CAUTION: GA is hazardous to waters, harmful for skin, respiratory system, and eyes. Work under the fume hood and refer to the SDS for information about handling and disposal.</li>
	<li>Place both microchips in their respective wells with the cells facing up.</li>
	<li>Wash once with CB.</li>
	<li>Fix cells with 2% GA for 10 min.</li>
	<li>Wash once with CB.</li>
	<li>Wash three times with PBS/BSA. 
	NOTE: The first fixation step with FA already fixes the biological structure but a reduced level of membrane protein diffusion may still occur, possibly leading to label induced clustering due to the presence of multiple streptavidins per QD. Keep the time of the experimental steps from FA fixation to GA, therefore, as short as possible to minimize the diffusion of the proteins in the membrane.</li>
	<li>Store in PBS/BSA to prevent osmotic shocks and 0.02% sodium azide (NaN3) to prevent bacterial growth at 4 &#176;C until graphene coating in a new well plate. Seal well plate with paraffin film to prevent drying. The microchips and cells are stable up to 2 weeks when stored at 4 &#730;C. 
	CAUTION: NaN3 is hazardous to waters and acutely toxic by oral ingestion, for skin and the respiratory system. Work under the fume hood and refer to the SDS for information about handling and disposal.</li>
</ol>
6. Cleaning and transferring graphene onto salt crystals
<ol>
	<li>Remove poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)-graphene from PMMA-graphene-on-polymer (Figure 2A).
	<ol>
		<li>Pipette a few droplets of water on the polymer around the PMMA-graphene. 
		NOTE: Ensure that the PMMA-graphene easily comes off the supporting polymer as it floats on the water surface.</li>
		<li>Immerse the PMMA-graphene-on-polymer into water with an angle of 30-45&#176; to release the PMMA-graphene. 
		NOTE: The polymer should only be slightly wetted. Pipetting too much water on the polymer will lift up and possibly fold the PMMA-graphene.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Etch copper-based contaminants using a sodium persulfate solution (Figure 2B). 
	NOTE: Commercial graphene grown on copper foil often contains sub-micrometer copper residues, which can be removed with a copper etchant solution22.
	<ol>
		<li>Prepare a 50 mL solution of 0.42 M sodium persulfate in water.</li>
		<li>Transfer PMMA-graphene into the sodium persulfate solution with the graphene side down using a standard glass slide. PMMA-graphene will float on top of the solution.</li>
		<li>Leave the PMMA-graphene in the sodium persulfate solution overnight.</li>
		<li>Remove the PMMA-graphene from the sodium persulfate solution and place it on top of clean water using a glass slide. Let it float on the water for half an hour.</li>
		<li>Repeat the previous step a total of three times to remove all sodium persulfate residues from the PMMA-graphene.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Transfer the PMMA-graphene onto a sodium chloride (NaCl) crystal.
	<ol>
		<li>Prepare a saturated solution of NaCl in water in a Petri dish.</li>
		<li>Transfer the PMMA-graphene on top of the NaCl solution with the graphene side down using a glass slide.</li>
		<li>Hold a NaCl crystal with tweezers and pick up the floating PMMA-graphene. 
		NOTE: The size of the NaCl crystal should be slightly larger than the size of the PMMA-graphene to avoid folding the protruding graphene at the edge of the salt or contacting the graphene with tweezers. In these experiments NaCl crystal of 12 mm x 12 mm x 0.5 mm is used for picking up a 10 mm x 10 mm graphene sheet and supporting it afterwards.</li>
		<li>Hold the PMMA-graphene-on-salt vertically for 2 min to let excess water flow out.</li>
		<li>Let the PMMA-graphene-on-salt dry at room temperature for 30 min and bake it in an oven at 100 &#176;C for 20 min to completely remove water.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Remove PMMA using an acetone wash (Figure 2C).
	<ol>
		<li>Preheat acetone in a glass Petri dish to ~50 &#176;C on a hotplate in the fume hood. Watch the temperature carefully to avoid fire.</li>
		<li>Immerse the PMMA-graphene-on-salt into the Petri dish filled with acetone and leave it to dissolve the PMMA for 30 min.</li>
		<li>Repeat the previous step a total of three times with new, clean acetone.</li>
		<li>Let the graphene-on-salt air-dry thoroughly before using it for sample preparation.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
7. Graphene Coating
NOTE: The graphene coating procedure is schematically shown in Figure 3A.
<ol>
	<li>Wash one microchip prepared with fixed cells and labeled HER2 in pure water to remove any residues of salt from the buffer. Place the microchip on a filter paper. The cells are visible as dark spots (Figure 3B).</li>
	<li>Cut the multilayer graphene on NaCl crystal into a piece that fits the SiN window of a microchip using a razor blade.</li>
	<li>Prepare a beaker of pure water and remove the graphene from the NaCl crystal by tilting the crystal about 45&#176; angle with respect to the water surface and touching the water. The graphene will float onto the water surface (Figure 3C).</li>
	<li>Catch the graphene with a metal loop from the surface of the water. The graphene will float within the droplet below the loop (Figure 3D).</li>
	<li>Touch the upper surface of the microchip with the lower loop surface. The microchip will stick to the metal loop. The graphene can be seen on top of the microchip (Figure 3E).</li>
	<li>Under a stereomicroscope, use filter paper to remove the remaining water from the microchip, so that the graphene covers all cells on the SiN window. 
	NOTE: The graphene will move when blotted. Make sure the graphene stays on the top of the window by touching the microchip just with the edge of the filter paper.</li>
	<li>Use tweezers to remove the microchip from the metal loop and place it onto a filter paper. The graphene is visible as a purple shimmer on the microchip (Figure 3F).</li>
	<li>Transfer the microchip from the paper to a compartment Petri dish.</li>
	<li>Pipette a droplet of water into one of the free compartments and close the lid to provide a water-saturated atmosphere.</li>
	<li>Seal the compartment dish with paraffin film and store in the fridge at 4 &#176;C if required for further measurements.</li>
</ol>
8. STEM
<ol>
	<li>Adjust the STEM at 200 kV beam energy using an alignment/test sample for a probe size of at least 0.2 nm by adjusting the condenser lenses, a probe current I = 180 pA (information about the probe current for different microscope settings is provided by the manufacturer within 5% accuracy) and a beam convergence semi-angle of 13.2 mrad by inserting an aperture. Set the ADF STEM detector opening semi-angle range (inner and outer) to 68-280 mrad by adjusting the projector lens settings. Set the STEM image size to 2048 x 2048 pixels, and the pixel dwell time t = 6 &#181;s.</li>
	<li>Load the microchip with graphene-coated cells in a standard specimen holder for TEM in such a way that the cells are facing up.</li>
	<li>Load the holder into the electron microscope.</li>
	<li>Acquire an overview picture at magnification (M) = 800x (Figure 4) using the settings in step 8.1.</li>
	<li>Identify a region of interest on a cell.</li>
	<li>Image the QDs with an ADF detector at M = 80,000x at a pixel size d = 1.3 nm (Figure 4) using the settings in step 8.1.</li>
	<li>Acquire an image of the area after exposure with a lower magnification (here, M = 50,000x) to show the exposed area (Figure 4).</li>
	<li>Calculate the electron dose 
	<img alt="Equation 3" src="/files/ftp_upload/61458/61458equ03.jpg" /> 
	where e is the elementary charge. With the settings given in the above, 
	<img alt="Equation 4" src="/files/ftp_upload/61458/61458equ04.jpg" /> 
	and an error of 5%.</li>
	<li>Acquire 20 images for a dose series with the same settings, but with t = 60 &#181;s resulting in an accumulated dose of 
	<img alt="Equation 20" src="/files/ftp_upload/61458/image001.png" />.</li>
	<li>To confirm the presence of graphene, switch the microscope to TEM at M = 1,200x, select a region near a cell, and switch to diffraction mode. Record a diffraction pattern at an exposure time of 0.5 s, 2048 x 2048 x 3 pixels, and a selected area aperture of 50 &#181;m (Figure 4).</li>
	<li>At the end of the session, remove the sample from the microscope, place the microchip back into the compartment dish, seal the dish with paraffin film, and store it in the fridge at 4 &#176;C if required for further measurements.</li>
	<li>Select the second microchip prepared in the same way as the first microchip but without graphene coating.</li>
	<li>Repeat steps 8.2-8.11 but now for this sample. Record a diffraction pattern with the same settings as in the above, as comparison (Figure 4).</li>
</ol>
9. Analysis
NOTE: For automated detection of QD positions in a STEM image, the analysis uses a plugin of local design for ImageJ (NIH), as described elsewhere20. The plugin is available upon request.
<ol>
	<li>The software automatically applies the following steps to detect particles in a STEM image:
	<ol>
		<li>Apply a Gaussian filter to reduce pixel noise.</li>
		<li>Apply a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) bandpass filter to obtain nanoparticles only.</li>
		<li>Set a threshold to binarize the image.</li>
		<li>Use a particle diameter of 10 nm with a tolerance factor of 2 for particle detection.</li>
		<li>Detect particle positions.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Measure the center-to-center distance between ten pairs of QDs per series. Here, 10 distances with varying size were measured per series.</li>
	<li>Calculate the relative change in particle distance by comparing each particle distance to the distance in the first image using: 
	<img alt="Equation 5" src="/files/ftp_upload/61458/61458equ05.jpg" />.</li>
</ol>

<ol>
	<li>Hell, S. W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Far-field+optical+nanoscopy.">Far-field optical nanoscopy.</a> Science. 316 (5828), 1153-1158 (2007).</li><li>Sigal, Y. M., Zhou, R., Zhuang, X. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Visualizing+and+discovering+cellular+structures+with+super-resolution+microscopy.">Visualizing and discovering cellular structures with super-resolution microscopy.</a> Science. 361 (6405), 880-887 (2018).</li><li>Williams, D. B., Carter, C. B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=.">.</a> The Transmission Electron Microscope. , (2009).</li><li>Bozzola, J. J., Russell, L. D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=.">.</a> Electron Microscopy Principles and Techniques for Biologists. , (1999).</li><li>Thompson, R. F., Walker, M., Siebert, C. A., Muench, S. P., Ranson, N. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=An+introduction+to+sample+preparation+and+imaging+by+cryo-electron+microscopy+for+structural+biology.">An introduction to sample preparation and imaging by cryo-electron microscopy for structural biology.</a> Methods. 100, 3-15 (2016).</li><li>Lucic, V., Leis, A., Baumeister, W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Cryo-electron+tomography+of+cells:+connecting+structure+and+function.">Cryo-electron tomography of cells: connecting structure and function.</a> Histochemistry and Cell Biology. 130 (2), 185-196 (2008).</li><li>Carson, J. L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Fundamental+technical+elements+of+freeze-fracture/freeze-etch+in+biological+electron+microscopy.">Fundamental technical elements of freeze-fracture/freeze-etch in biological electron microscopy.</a> Journal of Visualized Experiments. (91), e51694 (2014).</li><li>Nishiyama, H., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Atmospheric+scanning+electron+microscope+observes+cells+and+tissues+in+open+medium+through+silicon+nitride+film.">Atmospheric scanning electron microscope observes cells and tissues in open medium through silicon nitride film.</a> Journal of Structural Biology. 169 (3), 438-449 (2010).</li><li>Dahmke, I. N., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Graphene+Liquid+Enclosure+for+Single-Molecule+Analysis+of+Membrane+Proteins+in+Whole+Cells+Using+Electron+Microscopy.">Graphene Liquid Enclosure for Single-Molecule Analysis of Membrane Proteins in Whole Cells Using Electron Microscopy.</a> ACS Nano. 11 (11), 11108-11117 (2017).</li><li>Maruyama, Y., Ebihara, T., Nishiyama, H., Suga, M., Sato, C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Immuno+EM-OM+correlative+microscopy+in+solution+by+atmospheric+scanning+electron+microscopy+(ASEM).">Immuno EM-OM correlative microscopy in solution by atmospheric scanning electron microscopy (ASEM).</a> Journal of Structural Biology. 180 (2), 259-270 (2012).</li><li>Kinoshita, T., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Immuno-electron+microscopy+of+primary+cell+cultures+from+genetically+modified+animals+in+liquid+by+atmospheric+scanning+electron+microscopy.">Immuno-electron microscopy of primary cell cultures from genetically modified animals in liquid by atmospheric scanning electron microscopy.</a> Microscopy and Microanalysis. 20 (2), 469-483 (2014).</li><li>Hauwiller, M. R., Ondry, J. C., Alivisatos, A. P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Using+graphene+liquid+cell+transmission+electron+microscopy+to+study+in+situ+nanocrystal+etching.">Using graphene liquid cell transmission electron microscopy to study in situ nanocrystal etching.</a> Journal of Visualized Experiments. (135), e57665 (2018).</li><li>Cho, H., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=The+Use+of+Graphene+and+Its+Derivatives+for+Liquid-Phase+Transmission+Electron+Microscopy+of+Radiation-Sensitive+Specimens.">The Use of Graphene and Its Derivatives for Liquid-Phase Transmission Electron Microscopy of Radiation-Sensitive Specimens.</a> Nano Letters. 17 (1), 414-420 (2017).</li><li>Meng, F., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Graphene-Based+Fibers:+A+Review.">Graphene-Based Fibers: A Review.</a> Advanced Materials. 27 (35), 5113-5131 (2015).</li><li>Sun, P. Z., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Limits+on+gas+impermeability+of+graphene.">Limits on gas impermeability of graphene.</a> Nature. 579 (7798), 229-232 (2020).</li><li>Kato, R., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=High-precision+thickness+control+of+ice+layer+on+CVD+grown+bilayer+graphene+for+cryo-TEM.">High-precision thickness control of ice layer on CVD grown bilayer graphene for cryo-TEM.</a> Carbon. 160, 107-112 (2020).</li><li>Keskin, S., de Jonge, N. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Reduced+Radiation+Damage+in+Transmission+Electron+Microscopy+of+Proteins+in+Graphene+Liquid+Cells.">Reduced Radiation Damage in Transmission Electron Microscopy of Proteins in Graphene Liquid Cells.</a> Nano Letters. 18 (12), 7435-7440 (2018).</li><li>Giepmans, B. N., Deerinck, T. J., Smarr, B. L., Jones, Y. Z., Ellisman, M. H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Correlated+light+and+electron+microscopic+imaging+of+multiple+endogenous+proteins+using+Quantum+dots.">Correlated light and electron microscopic imaging of multiple endogenous proteins using Quantum dots.</a> Nature Methods. 2, 743-749 (2005).</li><li>Ring, E. A., Peckys, D. B., Dukes, M. J., Baudoin, J. P., de Jonge, N. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Silicon+nitride+windows+for+electron+microscopy+of+whole+cells.">Silicon nitride windows for electron microscopy of whole cells.</a> Journal of Microscopy. 243 (3), 273-283 (2011).</li><li>Peckys, D. B., Korf, U., de Jonge, N. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Local+variations+of+HER2+dimerization+in+breast+cancer+cells+discovered+by+correlative+fluorescence+and+liquid+electron+microscopy.">Local variations of HER2 dimerization in breast cancer cells discovered by correlative fluorescence and liquid electron microscopy.</a> Science Advances. 1 (6), 1500165 (2015).</li><li>Eigenbrot, C., Ultsch, M., Dubnovitsky, A., Abrahmsen, L., Hard, T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Structural+basis+for+high-affinity+HER2+receptor+binding+by+an+engineered+protein.">Structural basis for high-affinity HER2 receptor binding by an engineered protein.</a> Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 107 (34), 15039-15044 (2010).</li><li>Textor, M., de Jonge, N. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Strategies+for+Preparing+Graphene+Liquid+Cells+for+Transmission+Electron+Microscopy.">Strategies for Preparing Graphene Liquid Cells for Transmission Electron Microscopy.</a> Nano Letters. 18, 3313-3321 (2018).</li><li>Henjes, F., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Strong+EGFR+signaling+in+cell+line+models+of+ERBB2-amplified+breast+cancer+attenuates+response+towards+ERBB2-targeting+drugs.">Strong EGFR signaling in cell line models of ERBB2-amplified breast cancer attenuates response towards ERBB2-targeting drugs.</a> Oncogenesis. 1, 16 (2012).</li><li>Peckys, D. B., de Jonge, N. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Studying+the+Stoichiometry+of+Epidermal+Growth+Factor+Receptor+in+Intact+Cells+using+Correlative+Microscopy.">Studying the Stoichiometry of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Intact Cells using Correlative Microscopy.</a> Journal of Visualized Experiments. (103), e53186 (2015).</li><li>Pirkmajer, S., Chibalin, A. V. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Serum+starvation:+caveat+emptor.">Serum starvation: caveat emptor.</a> American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology. 301 (2), 272-279 (2011).</li><li>Kohl, H., Reimer, L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=.">.</a> Transmission electron microscopy: physics of image formation. , (2008).</li><li>Yi, H., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Native+immunogold+labeling+of+cell+surface+proteins+and+viral+glycoproteins+for+cryo-electron+microscopy+and+cryo-electron+tomography+applications.">Native immunogold labeling of cell surface proteins and viral glycoproteins for cryo-electron microscopy and cryo-electron tomography applications.</a> Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry. 63 (10), 780-792 (2015).</li><li>Wolf, S. G., Houben, L., Elbaum, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Cryo-scanning+transmission+electron+tomography+of+vitrified+cells.">Cryo-scanning transmission electron tomography of vitrified cells.</a> Nature Methods. 11 (4), 423-428 (2014).</li><li>Dukes, M. J., Ramachandra, R., Baudoin, J. P., Jerome, W. G., de Jonge, N. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Three-dimensional+locations+of+gold-labeled+proteins+in+a+whole+mount+eukaryotic+cell+obtained+with+3+nm+precision+using+aberration-corrected+scanning+transmission+electron+microscopy.">Three-dimensional locations of gold-labeled proteins in a whole mount eukaryotic cell obtained with 3 nm precision using aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy.</a> Journal of Structural Biology. 174, 552-562 (2011).</li><li>Meier, C., Beckmann, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Freeze+fracture:+new+avenues+for+the+ultrastructural+analysis+of+cells+in+vitro.">Freeze fracture: new avenues for the ultrastructural analysis of cells in vitro.</a> Histochemistry and Cell Biology. 149 (1), 3-13 (2018).</li><li>Peckys, D. B., de Jonge, N. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Liquid+scanning+transmission+electron+microscopy:+imaging+protein+complexes+in+their+native+environment+in+whole+eukaryotic+cells.">Liquid scanning transmission electron microscopy: imaging protein complexes in their native environment in whole eukaryotic cells.</a> Microscopy and Microanalysis. 20 (2), 346-365 (2014).</li><li>Egerton, R. F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Control+of+radiation+damage+in+the+TEM.">Control of radiation damage in the TEM.</a> Ultramicroscopy. 127, 100-108 (2013).</li><li>Wojcik, M., Hauser, M., Li, W., Moon, S., Xu, K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Graphene-enabled+electron+microscopy+and+correlated+super-resolution+microscopy+of+wet+cells.">Graphene-enabled electron microscopy and correlated super-resolution microscopy of wet cells.</a> Nature Communications. 6, 7384 (2015).</li><li>Huebinger, J., Spindler, J., Holl, K. J., Koos, B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Quantification+of+protein+mobility+and+associated+reshuffling+of+cytoplasm+during+chemical+fixation.">Quantification of protein mobility and associated reshuffling of cytoplasm during chemical fixation.</a> Scientific Reports. 8 (1), 17756 (2018).</li><li>Glauert, A. M., Lewis, P. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=.">.</a> Biological specimen preparation for transmission electron microscopy. , (2014).</li><li>Koo, K., Dae, K. S., Hahn, Y. K., Yuk, J. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Live+Cell+Electron+Microscopy+Using+Graphene+Veils.">Live Cell Electron Microscopy Using Graphene Veils.</a> Nano Letters. 20 (6), 4708-4713 (2020).</li><li>Pawley, J. B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=.">.</a> Handbook of biological confocal microscopy, 2 edn. , (1995).</li><li>Chung, I., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Spatial+control+of+EGF+receptor+activation+by+reversible+dimerization+on+living+cells.">Spatial control of EGF receptor activation by reversible dimerization on living cells.</a> Nature. 464 (7289), 783-787 (2010).</li></ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

To better understand protein function, it is important to obtain information about protein locations in the plasma membrane of intact cells. Methods for obtaining this information include super-resolution fluorescence microscopy1,2. Although super-resolution microscopy has further developed over the past years, its resolution is still limited to about 20 nm for practical conditions of cell experiments, while typical receptor proteins have sizes in the range of 1-10 nm. The imaging of proteins on single cell and single molecule level with sufficient resolution to visualize proteins is possible with EM. But due to sectioning, conventional EM methods typically do not leave the cell intact26, which leads to the loss of important information about the context and the spatial distribution of proteins in the plasma membrane. Methods for whole cells with cryo-TEM have been developed6, it is feasible to combine protein labeling with cryo-EM27, also cryo-STEM has been demonstrated28. However, cryo-EM workflows are optimized for studying the cellular ultrastructure and protein structure, and not so much for analyzing membrane protein spatial distributions. Critical point drying is another whole cell preparation method but the samples are subjected to several drying steps, and the technique is highly time-consuming29. Membrane proteins have also been examined via freeze fracture7. In this method, cells are fixed, frozen, and fractured. The fractured parts are replicated by carbon and platinum layers, and the biological sample is removed. The replicas can then be analyzed with EM30. Whole cell analysis is impossible with freeze fraction because information about the distribution of proteins in the membrane within context of the whole cell is lost.
The method presented here allows the cell membrane to be studied without needing to thin-slice the specimen9,31. The cells are kept intact so that the localization of the membrane proteins is visible from the fluorescence images, which are correlated with the EM images. Studying proteins at the single cell and single molecule level within intact cells in hydrated state has shown to be possible with a resolution of 2 nm using STEM of QD labeled proteins using this graphene enclosure method9. Keeping cells in their native state is crucial, as it preserves the spatial distribution of membrane proteins such that analyses are possible at the single cell and single molecule level, which is important for understanding protein functions, and developing new drugs for therapy approaches.
Another critical aspect of imaging biological samples with EM is the radiation damage of the samples caused by the electron beam. Solutions often include the reduction of the electron dose as much as possible or various coating methods, such as encapsulating the specimen between thin layers of carbon32. Our method shows that graphene coating reduces beam-induced artifacts that emerge on the cell surface for non-coated samples. Examination of the chemically fixed, and graphene coated biological samples is possible under electron beam irradiation at 200 keV beam energy up to D = (7.8&#177;0.4) x 103 e-/&#197;2 without radiation damage, such as bright spots, appearing on the sample. Compared to other EM methods that involve elaborate sample preparation, for example, staining, embedding, (cryo-) sectioning, fracturing, etc., the method described here is less time consuming. Labeling of the proteins is performed within a few hours, and graphene coating only requires about 15 min for trained researchers. The sample preparation is comparable with the procedures needed for fluorescence microscopy.
The protocol can be modified in some steps. The graphene on the microchip can also be air-dried to make sure that the graphene does not move when blotted with a filter paper. If the graphene is contaminated with salt, it is possible to let it float on the surface of water for about one hour to dissolve the salt and thus minimize contamination. Occurring copper or PMMA contamination on the graphene can be reduced by extending the corresponding etching steps in the protocol. Other graphene coating methods have been described where, for example, graphene-PMMA was directly deposited on cells, and the PMMA was removed by washing in acetone afterwards33. In our method, PMMA was removed before coating to avoid any possible damage to the cells caused by additional acetone washing steps. NaCl was chosen as a substrate here because it is flat, so it does not wrinkle the graphene, and it dissolves in water to release the graphene9. Besides, it can be cut into the desired size and no substrate residues are left on the graphene. But taking those criteria in consideration, other substrates like potassium chloride can possibly be used as well.
To reduce the chance of potential label-induced clustering, the GA fixation step can be implemented directly after FA fixation, after which all membrane proteins are immobilized. The first fixation step with FA already fixes the biological structure but a reduced level of membrane protein diffusion may still occur34, possibly leading to label induced clustering due to the presence of multiple Streptavidin per QD. Fixation with GA may lead to an autofluorescence signal during LM, and is, therefore, done after LM in the described protocol but can be reduced as described elsewhere34. Cacodylate buffer is quite toxic, and other fixatives can be used as well, but cacodylate is used here as it is a commonly used buffer for EM protocols, avoids precipitates, prevents the growth of bacterial and fungi, and is compatible with calcium ions that are needed to preserve the ultrastructural integrity of lipid membranes35. If needed, osmium tetroxide can be used as additional fixation for stabilizing the lipids. This would help to enhance contrast of the cell structure, but also add another metal to the system and reduce the contrast obtained on the QDs.
The protocol described here contains many steps that require good instruction. Some training is required before handling microchips to avoid scratching the SiN surface of the microchips and to prevent breakage. As mentioned before, it is recommended to prepare microchips in duplicates as the SiN window can break from time to time. Obtaining the required number of cells on a microchip also requires some experience. Coating the cells with graphene needs some training as it can be difficult to find the right tilting angle to float graphene on water. When catching the graphene from water, it may also be difficult to see the thin graphene. As soon as the graphene is on the microchip, excess water needs to be blotted off with a filter paper. This should only be done with the tip of a filter paper such to avoid removing the graphene from the microchip.
Graphene coating prevented artifacts from appearing on the sample. But for D &#60; 4 x 102 e-/&#197;2 also no artifacts emerged for the non-coated sample, and artifacts appeared for 2 non-coated samples only. Thus, examinations of non-coated cells also seem possible, although it would be better to use graphene and avoid the risk of artifact formation. The composition of those artifacts can be analyzed in the future to give hints about how to prevent their formation. Regarding the structural stability of the cells only a minor improvement of the graphene coating was observed. The fixed cells were apparently stabilized in the examined thin areas, where their structure was in close proximity of the SiN membrane. What we did not examine here, however, were drying artifacts that are known to occur for cellular samples when exposed to vacuum4. Drying of the cells would lead to shrinkage of the cells so that also the QD distances would change as a consequence. For the electron dose used here, the distance of QDs of graphene-coated and non-coated samples remained stable. Further studies are needed to examine the effect of graphene coating on the cells for EM.
One limitation of this method is that the chemical fixation of the cells is necessary; therefore, no live cell experiments can be performed. But in case the labeling is not needed and cells with a higher structural stability are used, for example bacteria, then unfixed cells can be enclosed in graphene for EM36 albeit with a different electron dose tolerance. Also, the proteins are not directly detectable, so QDs are needed to visualize the proteins. The method would benefit from smaller labels. A point of discussion is whether it is good or bad that the ultrastructure is not clearly visible. Our method is similar to that of fluorescence microscopy where only selected proteins are visible37. Increasing the visibility of the ultrastructure would also add much more information to the image, and then at some point prevent detection of the individual label positions. Furthermore, the method described here is for one protein species, and additions of the protocol are needed to be able to label multiple proteins. Last, the method works when a small high affinity specifically binding molecule such as antibody mimetic21 or nanobody38 is available. Commonly used antibodies are much larger and would prevent the detection of the functional state of the protein subunits into oligomers.
Our method is useful for studying protein function on whole cells using EM while keeping the cells in hydrated state. It is readily possible to examine series of cells. Other type of cells and proteins can be studied as well. If protein labeling is not needed, a subset of the protocol can be used for graphene coating of wide variety of biological specimens. The ability to study whole cells is relevant in cellular research for understanding correlations of membrane protein function at the molecular level.

Analysis of membrane protein function is essential for cell biological research, and for drug development. A class of important experiments involves the examination of membrane protein positions in cells. This information can be used to deduce conclusions about the assembly of proteins in protein complexes and their specific locations in the plasma membrane, which, via dynamic assembly and disassembly, drives a wide variety of cellular functions. Among other techniques, light microscopy (LM) and electron microscopy (EM) are used for studying protein functions in cells. LM allows the analysis of whole cells in liquid; however, the resolution is restricted to 200-300 nm for conventional and up to 20 nm for super resolution fluorescence microscopy under practical conditions1,2. EM provides around 1 &#197; resolutions3, but conventional sample preparation requires dehydration, metal staining to enhance image contrast, and embedding in a mounting substance, such as resin, for transmission electron microscopy (TEM)4. To preserve biological samples in a more native-like environment, cryo-EM techniques can be used5,6. The samples are rapidly frozen into amorphous ice, and, if needed, sectioned. Another option is freeze-fracturing EM7.
EM techniques for studying membrane proteins within intact cells in their native, liquid state have emerged in the past decade8,9,10,11. A spatial resolution of 2 nm was achieved on quantum dot (QD) labeled membrane proteins in whole cells grown on a SiN membrane and enclosed by a layer of graphene9.
Here, details of a protocol for protein labeling and graphene coating9,12 are described. The goal of this protocol is to analyze the spatial distribution of HER2 in the membrane of whole, fixed cells, while preserving the cells in a hydrated state. Coating with graphene prevents drying of the cells in vacuum, and also reduces radiation damage13. This method provides information about labeled membrane proteins within the intact plasma membrane, but the method is not useful for studying the cellular ultrastructure as is usually done with EM.
Graphene is the thinnest nanomaterial known, and consists of a single carbon atom thick crystalline sheet arranged in a honeycomb lattice14. It has unique properties including high flexibility and mechanical strength. Recent research has shown that defect-free graphene is impermeable to gases and liquids, but defects allow hydrogen permeation15. This leakage can be reduced by using multilayer graphene as used here. Bilayer graphene has recently shown to be useful as a support for cryo-EM samples, improving the homogeneity of the thin ice layer compared to graphene oxide where only nonuniform layers can be formed16. Graphene was also shown to reduce beam damage of biological samples during liquid-phase transmission electron microscopy13,17. As an exemplary experiment, HER2 expressed in the mammalian breast cancer cell line SKBR3 was labeled with QDs18 and its spatial distribution recorded using STEM. Cells were seeded on a Si microchip with an electron transparent SiN membrane19. The microchips were chosen as a support as they are robust, compatible with LM and EM, and the entire labeling procedure can be performed directly on the microchip19. After cell attachment, HER2 was labeled with a two-step labeling protocol20. First, a biotinylated anti-HER2 antibody mimetic compound21 was attached to HER2. The cells were then chemically fixed to prevent label-induced receptor clustering, and to increase the stability of the cellular ultrastructure. Streptavidin-coated QDs were subsequently linked to the HER2-antibody mimetic complex. The bright fluorescence signal and the electron-dense core of the QDs allowed correlative fluorescence- and electron microscopy (CLEM)20. CLEM is especially useful because cellular regions of interest for STEM analysis can be selected from the overview fluorescence microscopy images highlighting the localization of HER2 on the cells. Cells were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy to identify cellular regions with high HER2 levels. Thereafter, a 3-5 layer thick sheet of graphene was transferred onto the cells for coating9,22. Subsequently, the sample was mounted in an EM specimen holder. STEM data was acquired using the annular dark field (ADF) detector, providing information about the spatial distribution of HER2 on the cell surface relative to the cell surface location, but giving no information about the ultrastructure of the cell. To determine the stability of the sample under electron beam irradiation, the samples were examined at increasing dose&#160;(D) in an image series. The difference between graphene-coated and non-coated samples was investigated. Several kinds of radiation damage were evaluated.
The protocol described here uses the HER2 overexpressing mammalian breast cancer cell line SKBR3 as a model system for targeting HER223. The protocol includes the preparation of one graphene-coated sample, and one similar sample but without graphene coating for comparison. The experiment is prepared in duplicate since the SiN window may break once every while, and to obtain an experimental duplicate in most cases. The overall yield of the method is high meaning that microchips with graphene covered cells are usually obtained with an exceptional error even though not the entire SiN window may be covered with graphene in all cases. Duplicates are not described in the protocol.
The labeling protocol (steps 1-5) is comparable to the protocol of the labeling of the epidermal growth factor receptor in COS7 fibroblast cells published previously24; details in that paper are referred to regarding the handling of the microchips, and the usage of the well plates. The following protocol is optimized for labeling HER2, graphene coating9, and examining the radiation tolerance of the sample.

<table>
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>Acetone for HPLC (min. 99.8 %)</td>
			<td>Th. Geyer GmbH + Co. KG, Renningen, Germany</td>
			<td>2626-1L</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>AL54 analytical balance</td>
			<td>Mettler-Toledo GmbH, Giessen, Germany</td>
			<td>30029077</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Albumin Fraction V, biotin-free, &#8805; 98 %, for molecular biology</td>
			<td>Carl Roth GmbH + Co KG, Karlsruhe, Germany</td>
			<td>0163.2</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Anti-HER2 Affibody Molecule, biotin conjugated 20 &#181;M</td>
			<td>Affibody, Solna, Sweden</td>
			<td>10.0817.02.0001</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>atomic resolution analytical microscope JEM-ARM200F</td>
			<td>JEOL (Germany) GmbH, Freising, Germany</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Boric Acid</td>
			<td>Sigma-Aldrich, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany</td>
			<td>B6768-500G</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Cacodylic acid sodium salt trihydrate &#8805; 98 %</td>
			<td>Carl Roth GmbH + Co KG, Karlsruhe, Germany</td>
			<td>5169.1</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Cell Culture Flasks, PS, treated, sterile, Filter screw cap 50ml</td>
			<td>Labsolute, Th. Geyer GmbH + Co. KG, Renningen, Germany</td>
			<td>7696781</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Cell Culture Flasks, PS, treated, sterile, Filter screw cap 250ml</td>
			<td>Labsolute, Th. Geyer GmbH + Co. KG, Renningen, Germany</td>
			<td>7696782</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Cell Culture Multiwell plates, treated, 24-well</td>
			<td>Labsolute, Th. Geyer GmbH + Co. KG, Renningen, Germany</td>
			<td>7696792</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Cell Culture Multiwell plates, treated, 96-well</td>
			<td>Labsolute, Th. Geyer GmbH + Co. KG, Renningen, Germany</td>
			<td>7696794</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>CELLSTAR Cell Culture Flasks TC treated, 250 ml</td>
			<td>Greiner Bio-One GmbH, Frickenhausen, Germany</td>
			<td>658170</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>CELLSTAR Cell Culture Multiwell Plates 96-well</td>
			<td>Greiner Bio-One GmbH, Frickenhausen, Germany</td>
			<td>655180</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>CELLSTAR Centrifuge Tubes 15 ml sterile</td>
			<td>Greiner Bio-One GmbH, Frickenhausen, Germany</td>
			<td>188271</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>CELLview cell culture dish, PS, 35/10mm, glass bottom, 1 compartment</td>
			<td>Greiner Bio-One GmbH, Frickenhausen, Germany</td>
			<td>627861</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Centrifuge 5418</td>
			<td>Eppendorf, Wesseling-Berzdorf, Germany</td>
			<td>5401000010</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Centrifuge Tubes 50 ml sterile</td>
			<td>Labsolute, Th. Geyer GmbH + Co. KG, Renningen, Germany</td>
			<td>7696705</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Corning CellStripper non-enzymatic cell dissociation solution</td>
			<td>Corning, NY, USA</td>
			<td>25-056-CI</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>D(+)-Saccharose min. 99,7 %, powdered</td>
			<td>Th. Geyer GmbH + Co. KG, Renningen, Germany</td>
			<td>9286.1</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Disposable Hemocytometer C-Chip Neubauer improved</td>
			<td>Carl Roth GmbH + Co KG, Karlsruhe, Germany</td>
			<td>PK36.1</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Easypet</td>
			<td>Eppendorf, Wesseling-Berzdorf, Germany</td>
			<td>4430000018</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Eppendorf Research plus pipettes variable, 0.1 - 2.5 &#181;l</td>
			<td>Eppendorf, Wesseling-Berzdorf, Germany</td>
			<td>3123000012</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Eppendorf Research plus pipette variable, 2 -20 &#181;l</td>
			<td>Eppendorf, Wesseling-Berzdorf, Germany</td>
			<td>3123000039</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Eppendorf Research plus pipette variable, 10 - 100 &#181;l</td>
			<td>Eppendorf, Wesseling-Berzdorf, Germany</td>
			<td>3123000047</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Eppendorf Research plus pipette variable, 100 - 1000 &#181;l</td>
			<td>Eppendorf, Wesseling-Berzdorf, Germany</td>
			<td>3123000063</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Ethanol absolute for HPLC (min. 99.9 %)</td>
			<td>Th. Geyer GmbH + Co. KG, Renningen, Germany</td>
			<td>2222-1L</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Fibronectin-like engineered protein*poly mer-plus</td>
			<td>Th. Geyer GmbH + Co. KG, Renningen, Germany</td>
			<td>F8141</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Fluorescence Microscope Leica DMI6000</td>
			<td>Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Gibco Dulbecco&#39;s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), high glucose, GlutaMAX Supplement, pyruvate</td>
			<td>FisherScientific, Hampton, NH, USA</td>
			<td>31966021</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Gibco Fetal Calf Serum (FCS)</td>
			<td>FisherScientific, Hampton, NH, USA</td>
			<td>10099141</td>
			<td>lot number: 1751893</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Gibco Goat Serum, New Zealand origin</td>
			<td>FisherScientific, Hampton, NH, USA</td>
			<td>16210064</td>
			<td>lot number: 1788320</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Gibco Phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4</td>
			<td>ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA</td>
			<td>10010015</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Galaxy 48R CO2 Incubator</td>
			<td>New Brunswick, Eppendorf, Wesseling-Berzdorf, Germany</td>
			<td>CO48310001</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Gatan Model 950 Solarus&#151; Plasma Cleaner</td>
			<td>Gatan GmbH, M&#252;nchen, Germany</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Glutaraldehyde solution Grade I, 25% in H2O, specially purified for use as an electron microscopy fixative</td>
			<td>Sigma-Aldrich, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany</td>
			<td>G5882</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Glycine &#8805; 98.5 % Ph.Eur., USP, BP</td>
			<td>Carl Roth GmbH + Co KG, Karlsruhe, Germany</td>
			<td>T873.1</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Inverted Laboratory Microscope Leica DM IL LED</td>
			<td>Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany</td>
			<td>DM IL LED</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Hot plate</td>
			<td>Heidolph Instruments GmbH &#38; CO. KG, Schwabach, Germany</td>
			<td>MR 3002</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>MEM non-essential Aminoacids (NEAAs) 100x W/O L-Glutamine</td>
			<td>Biowest, Nuaill&#233;, France</td>
			<td>X0557-100</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Microscope glass slides 76 mm x 26 mm</td>
			<td>DWK Life Sciences GmbH, Wertheim/Main</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>micro tubes (1.5 ml, 2 ml) non-sterile</td>
			<td>Labsolute, Th. Geyer GmbH + Co. KG, Renningen, Germany</td>
			<td>1.5 ml: 7696751, 2 ml: 7696752</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>MSc-Advantage&#151; Class II Biological Safety Cabinet</td>
			<td>ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, USA</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Ocean Microchips SiN window 400x150 &#181;m, 200 nm spacer</td>
			<td>DENSsolutions, Delft, The Netherlands</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Omnifix Single-use syringe Luer Lock Solo (10 ml, 20 ml, 50 ml)</td>
			<td>B. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany</td>
			<td>10 mL: C542.1 20 ml: T550.1</td>
			<td>purchased via Carl Roth GmbH&#38;Co. KG, Karlsruhe</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Oven</td>
			<td>Memmert GmbH + Co. KG, Schwabach, Germany</td>
			<td>VO 200</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Parafilm</td>
			<td>VWR, Darmstadt, Germany</td>
			<td>#291-0057</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Paraformaldehyde 16 % solution, EM grade</td>
			<td>Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA</td>
			<td>15710</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Perfekt-Kescher with handle</td>
			<td>Plano GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany</td>
			<td>T5112</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Pipette tips with aerosol barrier in racks, non-sterile</td>
			<td>Labsolute, Th. Geyer GmbH + Co. KG, Renningen, Germany</td>
			<td>2-200&#181;l: 7695892</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Pipette tips with aerosol barrier in racks, sterile</td>
			<td>Labsolute, Th. Geyer GmbH + Co. KG, Renningen, Germany</td>
			<td>0.1-10 &#181;l: 7695880 2-100 &#181;l: 7695883 100-1000 &#181;l: 7695886 1250 &#181;l XL: 7695887</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Poly-L-Lysine 0.01 % solution mol.WT.70.000 - 150.000</td>
			<td>Th. Geyer GmbH + Co. KG, Renningen, Germany</td>
			<td>P4707</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Qdot 655 Streptavidin Conjugate 1 &#181;M</td>
			<td>Invitrogen, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA</td>
			<td>Q10121MP</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Razor blade, Gem Uncoated 3 Facet, Steel Back, Degreased</td>
			<td>Personna, AccuTec Blades, Verona, VA, USA</td>
			<td>94-0451</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>round filter paper, ashless, Grade 589/3 blue ribbon, diam. 150mm</td>
			<td>Schleicher &#38; Schuell, Dassel, Germany</td>
			<td>300212</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Routine stereo Microscope Leica M60</td>
			<td>Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany</td>
			<td>M60</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Serological ROTILABO pipettes, sterile (1 ml, 2 ml, 10 ml)</td>
			<td>Th. Geyer GmbH + Co. KG, Renningen, Germany</td>
			<td>1 ml: N231.1 2 ml: N236.1 10 ml: ET30.1</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Serological pipettes, sterile, (1 ml, 2 ml, 10ml)</td>
			<td>Labsolute, Th. Geyer GmbH + Co. KG, Renningen, Germany</td>
			<td>1ml: 7695550 2ml: 7695551 10ml: 7695553</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Serological pipettes, sterile, (5 ml, 25 ml, 50 ml)</td>
			<td>Labsolute, Th. Geyer GmbH + Co. KG, Renningen, Germany</td>
			<td>5 mL: 7695552 25ml: 7695554 50ml: 7695555</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Shaking water bath SW22</td>
			<td>Julabo GmbH, Seelbach, Germany</td>
			<td>9550322</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Sodium chloride</td>
			<td>Carl Roth GmbH + Co KG, Karlsruhe, Germany</td>
			<td>HN00.1</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Sodium chloride crystals, cleaved 12 mm x 12 mm x 0.5-1 mm</td>
			<td>International Crystal Laboratories, Garfield, NJ, USA</td>
			<td>9750</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Sodium tetraborate decahydrate, ACS reagent, &#8805; 99.5 %</td>
			<td>Sigma-Aldrich, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany</td>
			<td>S9640-500G</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Sodium persulfate</td>
			<td>carl Roth GmbH + Co KG, Karlsruhe, Germany</td>
			<td>4365.2</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>syringe filters ROTILABO PES, sterile 0.22 &#181;m</td>
			<td>Carl Roth GmbH + Co KG, Karlsruhe, Germany</td>
			<td>P668.1</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Trivial Transfer Graphene 3-5layers, 1 cm x 1 cm</td>
			<td>ACS material, Pasadena, CA, USA</td>
			<td>TTG30011</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Tweezers Dumoxel 03</td>
			<td>Manufactures D&#8217;Outils Dumont SA, Montignez, Switzerland</td>
			<td>0103-7-PO</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Tweezers Inox 02</td>
			<td>Manufactures D&#8217;Outils Dumont SA, Montignez, Switzerland</td>
			<td>0102-7-PO</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Tweezers, plastic replaceable tip</td>
			<td>Ideal-tek SA, Balerna, Switzerland</td>
			<td>5SVR.SA</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Water ROTISOLV HPLC gradient grade</td>
			<td>Carl Roth GmbH + Co KG, Karlsruhe, Germany</td>
			<td>A511.2</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>

graphene enclosure of chemically fixed mammalian cells for liquid-phase electron microscopy

A protocol is described for investigating the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in the intact plasma membrane of breast cancer cells using scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). Cells of the mammalian breast cancer cell line SKBR3 were grown on silicon microchips with silicon nitride (SiN) windows. Cells were chemically fixed, and HER2 proteins were labeled with quantum dot nanoparticles (QDs), using a two-step biotin-streptavidin binding protocol. The cells were coated with multilayer graphene to maintain a hydrated state, and to protect them from electron beam damage during STEM. To examine the stability of the samples under electron beam irradiation, a dose series experiment was performed. Graphene-coated and non-coated samples were compared. Beam induced damage, in the form of bright artifacts, appeared for some non-coated samples at increased electron dose D, while no artifacts appeared on coated samples.

Figure 1A shows cells seeded in such a way that the window is covered but with sufficient space to allow them to flatten out and adhere, leading to confluency of about 2/3rd (Figure 1B). In case too many cells are seeded on a microchip (Figure 1C), there is insufficient space for all cells to adhere to the microchip. Figure 1D shows the same microchip after 24 h. More than half of the cells didn&#8217;t flatten. On the other hand, if too few cells are seeded (Figure 1E), the SiN window will end up with a large empty space after 24 h as seen in Figure 1F. Figure 1G shows the DIC image of the cells in Figure 1A and Figure 1B. Figure 1H shows the corresponding fluorescence image false colored in yellow indicating successful labeling of HER2.
Representative STEM data is shown in Figure 4. Graphene-coated (left column) and non-coated (right column) SKBR3 cells were investigated. Figure 4A,B show M = 800x overview images of the cells on the window. The areas shown as insets were imaged at M = 80,000x during the dose series, see Figure 4C,D. The QDs are visible as bright spots here. Figure 4E and Figure 4F show M = 50,000x magnified images acquired at the locations of the rectangles in Figure 4C,D. Both images were recorded after the acquisition of a dose series with D = (7.8 &#177; 0.4) x 103 e-/&#197;2. The dose series was recorded at M = 80,000x. The exposed areas can be recognized as rectangles, whereby the rectangle was clearly visible for the non-coated sample (Figure 4F).
To verify the presence of graphene, diffraction patterns of areas without cells, but with or without graphene on the SiN window were acquired. The hexagonal structure of the graphene was observed in the diffraction pattern of the graphene-coated sample (Figure 4G), while it was absent for the non-coated sample (Figure 4H). The diffraction pattern of single crystal graphene will have six-fold symmetry due to highly ordered hexagonal structure of graphene. So, the hexagonal structure indicates the presence of graphene on the samples.
To investigate the effect of electron beam illumination on the sample, STEM images were acquired in an image series with an accumulating electron dose. Representative results for non-coated and graphene-coated samples are shown in Figure 5A-D and Figure 5E-G, respectively. All data were acquired at the edge of the cell, where the cell is the flattest, and the observed structure is thus the closest to the SiN membrane. The exposure of a non-coated samples led to bright structures appearing on the cell surfaces at D = (1.9 &#177; 0.1) x 103 e-/&#197;2 (Figure 5B). These structures became larger with higher doses, so they were clearly visible in the last image of the series at D = (7.8 &#177; 0.4) x 103 e-/&#197;2 (Figure 5C,D). These spots did not appear on any of the graphene-coated samples (Figure 5E-G).
Additional microchips were prepared and examined using the protocol described in the above. Six coated and seven non-coated samples were investigated in total. Two out of seven non-coated samples showed these artifacts. None of the coated samples showed any additional bright spots.
As another measure of radiation damage, the distance between QDs was examined. If structural damage were to occur, one would expect distances between QDs to change. Changes in distances were measured for different pairs of QDs with accumulating D for a range of pair distances. Figure 5H shows that the relative change of the particles for non-coated samples stayed below 1.3% on average, while the average relative distance remained below 0.8% for the coated samples. One can, therefore, conclude that the graphene coating stabilized the sample but the dried-in samples without graphene coating was also remarkably stable.
<img alt="Figure 1" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/61458/61458fig01.jpg" /> 
Figure 1: Cell seeding on a SiN window of a silicon microchip and HER2 labeled.&#160;(A) Exemplary image of a SiN window region with SKBR3 cells 5 min after seeding on the microchip. (B) The same cells spread on the same SiN window after 24 h. (C) SKBR3 cells on a Si microchip 5 min after seeding. (D) Same cells as in (C) after 24 h. Cells didn&#8217;t flatten properly as there were too many cells on the chips upon seeding. (E) Cells on a microchip 5 min after seeding. (F) Only few cells were visible on the window because too few cells were seeded on the microchip. (G) DIC image of the same SKBR3 cells after QD labeling of HER2. (H) Overlay image of DIC and corresponding fluorescence image of labeled SKBR3 cells with HER2-QD655 (false colored in yellow). <a href="https://www-jove-com.remotexs.ntu.edu.sg/files/ftp_upload/61458/61458fig01large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Figure 2" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/61458/61458fig02.jpg" /> 
Figure 2: Cleaning and transferring of graphene onto NaCl crystals.&#160;(A) PMMA-graphene-on-polymer is immersed in pure water to release PMMA graphene. PMMA-graphene can be caught with a glass slide. (B) Copper-based contaminations were etched using sodium persulfate solution. To clean the graphene, it was transferred to a beaker containing deionized water. These steps were repeated 3 times. The PMMA-graphene was then transferred to saturated solution of NaCl in pure water. A NaCl crystal was used to pick up the graphene from the salt solution. (C) The PMMA-graphene on NaCl crystal was dried out for 30 min at room temperature. PMMA was removed by incubating the block in acetone for 30 min. <a href="https://www-jove-com.remotexs.ntu.edu.sg/files/ftp_upload/61458/61458fig02large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Figure 3" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/61458/61458fig3v2.jpg" /> 
Figure 3: Graphene coating of cells seeded on a Si microchip.&#160;(A) Procedure of graphene coating. Graphene on NaCl crystal is released onto the water surface. The graphene piece is then caught with a metal loop and transferred onto the Si microchip. (B) Microchip (2.0 x 2.6 mm) with a SiN window of dimensions 400 x 160 &#956;m without graphene. SKBR3 cells were visible as dark spots. (C) Graphene (red circle) floating on the surface of a beaker filled with water. (D) Graphene caught with a metal loop. (E) The microchip attached to the water droplet so that the graphene was on top of the SiN window. (F) Microchip after graphene coating. The graphene was visible as a purple shimmer. <a href="https://www-jove-com.remotexs.ntu.edu.sg/files/ftp_upload/61458/61458fig3v2large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Figure 4" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/61458/61458fig04v2.jpg" /> 
Figure 4: STEM of graphene coated and non-coated SKBR3 cells on SiN window.&#160;(A) STEM image of a graphene coated sample acquired at a M = 800x. (B) STEM image of a non-coated sample acquired at M = 800x. (C) M = 80,000x image recorded at the position of the blue rectangle in A. Yellow lines represents examples distances measured within particle. (D) M = 80,000x image recorded at the position of the blue rectangle in B. Yellow line represents examples distances measured within particles. (E) M = 50,000x image of the same region as C exposed to D = (7.8&#177;0.4) x 103 e-/&#197;2. (F) M = 50,000x image of the same region as D and exposed to D = (7.8&#177;0.4) x 103 e-/&#197;2. The exposed area were clearly seen. (G) Diffraction pattern of a graphene-coated sample from an area without cells. The six-fold symmetry of the graphene is visible as bright spots. (H) Diffraction pattern of a sample without graphene showing no 6-fold bright spots. <a href="https://www-jove-com.remotexs.ntu.edu.sg/files/ftp_upload/61458/61458fig04large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Figure 5" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/61458/61458fig05.jpg" /> 
Figure 5: Artifacts arising on samples without graphene coating.&#160;(A) First images of regions on samples without graphene coating acquired at M = 80,000x, and exposed to D = (0.39 &#177; 0.02) x 102 e-/&#197;2. (B) Images with the first artifacts arising at D = (1.94 &#177; 0.1) x 103 e-/&#197;2 (yellow arrows). (C, D) Last image of the series acquired with D = (7.8 &#177; 0.4) x 103 e-/&#197;2. Artifacts were visible as bright spots. (E-G) Graphene coated samples without arising artifacts. (E) D = (0.39 &#177; 0.02) x 102 e-/&#197;2 (F) D = (1.94 &#177; 0.1) x 103 e-/&#197;2 (G) D = (7.8 &#177; 0.4) x 103 e-/&#197;2. (H) Relative change in particle distances for graphene coated and non-coated samples. Two of the non-coated samples showing artifacts, one of which shown in (A-C), and the last image of the second sample in D, as well as three coated samples were analyzed (one is shown in E-G). In total, ten QD pairs were examined per sample with distances ranging between 250 nm and 3 &#181;m. The relative change reflects the average of all measurements in one group. <a href="https://www-jove-com.remotexs.ntu.edu.sg/files/ftp_upload/61458/61458fig05large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
Supplementary Table 1: Recipes for solutions and buffers. <a href="https://cloudflare-jove-com.remotexs.ntu.edu.sg/files/ftp_upload/61458/Preparation_of_Solutions.xlsx" target="_blank">Please click here to download this table.</a>

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Graphene Enclosure of Chemically Fixed Mammalian Cells for Liquid-Phase Electron Microscopy at JoVE.com

Graphene Enclosure of Chemically Fixed Mammalian Cells for Liquid-Phase Electron Microscopy

Presented here is a protocol for labeling membrane proteins in mammalian cells and coating the sample with graphene for liquid-phase scanning transmission electron microscopy. The stability of the samples against the damage caused by radiation can also studied with this protocol.

A protocol is described for investigating the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in the intact plasma membrane of breast cancer cells using ...

graphene-enclosure-chemically-fixed-mammalian-cells-for-liquid-phase

Nanyang Technological University

Research

JoVE Journal

Biology

7.0K Views.  INM-Leibniz Institute for New Materials. Presented here is a protocol for labeling membrane proteins in mammalian cells and coating the sample with graphene for liquid-phase scanning transmission electron microscopy. The stability of the samples against the damage caused by radiation can also studied with this protocol.

Video: Graphene Enclosure of Chemically Fixed Mammalian Cells for Liquid-Phase Electron Microscopy

Long-term Imaging Mammalian Cells using Wide-Field Microscopy

Actually what I'm gonna do, mount it in here first and then swap out You. So now I'm gonna aspirate try and be as gentle as possible.Okay. A few seconds just holding.Okay.Alright.So the important features of our lifestyle imaging grid are that, so it's an inverted scope, which means the objective, the samples here in the objective is underneath. So the objective is pointing up and the whole scope, or practically the whole, practically the whole scope, including the objectives and the sample are at 37 degrees. So everything in this plastic box is at 37 degrees.And right on top of the stage we have an air and CO2 mix. That is 5%CO2. So the idea is that the sample is actually in a cell, it's like a cell incubator.And so we have, this is our mixer for the air and the CO2 and, and it gets humidified and heated and then piped onto the, the sample on the stage.Okay. And today we're just gonna be doing fluorescence one channel GFP fluorescence. This is the hose that the CO2 and 5%CO2 goes in and it just fits into the stage holder.That's important. And then we can close these, take these down, and then we go to our first position. And what I'm gonna do is go to the first field, which is my control sample, and I'll pick positions based on what I see on the screen.So I just make sure I actually look into the microscope in each new, well, because the focal plane for each of the wells is different, the, the dish is not perfectly flat on the bottom. So you will need to make fine adjustments when you move from well to the well. So right now I'm on the first, well, what I'll do is I'll focus, so I just hit, I just told, I just turned on the light, the transmitted light for the microscope.And I have make sure all the light is going to the eye pieces. And so I just look in, make sure I get a nice clean field. And then what I'll do is turn that light off, turn the fluorescence light on, make sure the cells that I'm looking at look healthy and they're not apoptotic.And, and I turn that off. And what I do next is send, so now I'm gonna start picking positions, which means I have to te send the light path to the camera. This is the camera right here.So I tell the microscope to send all the camera, they don't see anything in the eye pieces. What I'll do is in the software controlling the microscope, I'll choose the right filter set, which for our purposes is psy. And then set an exposure time.And I know these cells very well and I know that they take a 0.2 second exposure time. So I tell, that's what I tell the software to do. And what I'll do is hit focus.This is, and it's basically just alive. The, A light will turn on and you can, oh, I don't know if you can see cells, but the reason this is a good field is because there's, all the cells are, even in terms of their fluorescence, There are no apoptotic cells. Apoptotic cells tend to be very bright and there's no dirt or schmutz in the field.And you can see that they're actually, this is a metaphase cell and that's a metaphase cell, that's a cell that's probably just exited mitosis. And I can just tell that because it looks like those are, those two sets of chromatin are very nicely oriented to each other. Like they just exited an face.So that's a good field. So, and now that I know that the exposure time and the filter set is correct, and this is gonna be software specific, I'll go and I'll take positions and now the software has memorized the X, Y, Z position of that field. And then when I do pick another field, it's, and I'll, so when I'm picking, when I'm picking new fields, but in the same, well, I'll use the, I'll move the i'll, I'll turn the shutter, I'll open the shutter and I'll look to see what I see on the screen and I'll pick fields based on that versus looking in the field.So I don't see any of my tonics in there. But again, even nicely centered, these cells will go through my PS I continue, here's a good example. Here's a good example of what I would avoid that, see how bright that is?That's very bright. That's probably remnants of an apoptotic cell. And the reason I would avoid that is because since it's so bright, when the software auto focuses, it will autofocus just on that and it won't be in the same plane as all these other cells.And so I won't get any information from that field. That looks nice. There's a, this is a pro metaphase right here, That's A metaphase.So, and I'm gonna take three positions per well. So that was three positions and now I'm going to go to my next Well, so you can, so what I will probably do is take images every 10 minutes. So it's a compromise.Lifestyle imaging is always a compromise, right? You have to image, you have to keep the cells healthy, especially if you're interested in mitosis. So you have to minimize their exposure to the fluorescent line.And, but you wanna get information. So you have to take images, you have to, so you have to compromise, you have to make a choice about what you want to capture, what kind of information you wanna capture. For our purposes, mitosis tends to take about an hour.So if we're taking 10 minute intervals, that's pretty good. We see prophase, we see metaphase, we see anaphase, and we can, we can see when there are, there are treatments or drugs or siRNAs that affect those specific cell cycle stages. So for our purposes, that's enough, but we always want more.We always want more positions or finer time and interval or something like that. So it's a compromise. So, and then I'll hit start.And so our software, it does an autofocusing pass on the first pass. So once I hit start, it should start auto autofocusing and you'll see the shutter open, open and close between auto focusing. So I'll hit start.So that's the shutter opening and closing. The Z motor is engaging and it's actually trying to find the plane with the most contrast, which will be the most in focus. You can actually see on the screen going in and out of finding the best plane of focus that might be worrisome.So what it does is it, it drives the Z motor to find the best, the most in focus plane focus, well the most in image. And then it acquires picture there and then it learns that Z position. And then we'll use that Z position for the next 12 passes.And then we'll do the auto focusing pass again. What Kind of experiments do they do? Okay, so our lab is mostly interested in understanding what regulates mitic progression, or at least I'm most interested in understanding that.So with live cell imaging and especially our multi position, long-term imaging scope, you can take, you can film cells for two or three days entering anding mitosis, and you can image multiple rounds of mitosis so you can understand. And then you can put drugs or RNAs or any kind of perturbations on the cells that you would like to study. So you can understand how, how those drugs or, or genes are, are important in regulating mitotic progression.Because it's not fixed cell work and live cell work, you can understand what, when you need to have a perturbation to affect mitosis or what stage of mitosis is affected. So it's really powerful in that respect. What, what are the main technical elements of this experiments?What are the possible problems? Well, the biggest problem besides getting the rig set up, getting the rig set up is not trivial. A lot of people have the rig, but just making sure it works well for your application.The financial element is not, you know, is not small. So there's the setting up of the apparatus and then, and then once you gather the data, there's a real data analysis issue. It takes these movie, if, so, if you're gathering 40 movies each with 30 cells, so you have 40 in 40 fields that you just filmed and each of those fields has 30 cells, then you have to sit down with each one of those movies and look at each one of those cells in that movie.So it takes a really long time to do data analysis. And that's, so it takes a week to analyze data that it took you two days to collect. So there's a, that's a very big obstacle in terms of gathering lots of data.So it's not, while it's high throughput data collection, it's not high throughput analysis. So what would you make to make this experiment really high throughput? So our lab is in the process of developing a program that does the data analysis automatically.And it's a pretty decent program. It's not perfect. The human eye is always better, but it's getting there.So What are the interesting application of this experiment? Maybe other fields you can mention? Besides cell division?You mean for the, oh, for the live cell imaging? Yes.Well, you can do cell motility assays. You can, depending on the, the microscopy that's involved, you can, you know, look at how cells, you could look at tumor development if you really wanted to.But there, you, you're, if as long as you have the right imaging set up, you can, you're pretty much not limited in terms of anything. Our scope happens to be just a wide field and we use 20 by 20 x objective. So it's a pretty low resolution set up, but that's sufficient for what we need to see.So there are, but there definitely aren't, you wouldn't be limited. Anything that has any dynamic kind of experiment, which is biology, it would be, would really benefit from lifestyle imaging. So calcium imaging, although you couldn't do it on our apparatus, that's a live cell.You definitely need live cell imaging for that. Like I said, patient assays, motility assays, those kinds of things would really benefit from live cell imaging. Would you like to tell a few words about your previous experience?How long do you work on these techniques? What do you you work on before? Wow.So in my PhD I didn't work.I did a lot of confocal microscopy, but no lifestyle imaging. And so during my postdoc I was, I helped Dr.King get this apparatus that, that we just used to set up these fragment, get that up and running. And, and so during my postdoc, I had a lot of experience with both widefield with TimeLapse imaging on our scope, which is the widefield and also TimeLapse imaging with confocal microscopy.And I would say that it's really powerful. You get a lot of information, but it's not easy to get working perfectly. So it really requires a lot of attention and a lot of attention to details at every little step of the process.And, and then you still have problems. So it's a tough application, but you can really get, if, if it's what you need to have to, to study your problem, your scientific problem, then it, it's invaluable in that respect, but it's tough. So find someone who knows what they're doing and use them.That's my advice. So good.

MISSION esiRNA for RNAi Screening in Mammalian Cells

RNA interference (RNAi) is a basic cellular mechanism for the control of gene expression. RNAi is induced by short double-stranded RNAs also known as small interfering RNAs (siRNAs). The short double-stranded RNAs originate from longer double stranded precursors by the activity of Dicer, a protein of the RNase III family of endonucleases. The resulting fragments are components of the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), directing it to the cognate target mRNA. RISC cleaves the target mRNA thereby reducing the expression of the encoded protein1,2,3. RNAi has become a powerful and widely used experimental method for loss of gene function studies in mammalian cells utilizing small interfering RNAs.
Currently two main methods are available for the production of small interfering RNAs. One method involves chemical synthesis, whereas an alternative method employs endonucleolytic cleavage of target specific long double-stranded RNAs by RNase III in vitro. Thereby, a diverse pool of siRNA-like oligonucleotides is produced which is also known as endoribonuclease-prepared siRNA or esiRNA. A comparison of efficacy of chemically derived siRNAs and esiRNAs shows that both triggers are potent in target-gene silencing. Differences can, however, be seen when comparing specificity. Many single chemically synthesized siRNAs produce prominent off-target effects, whereas the complex mixture inherent in esiRNAs leads to a more specific knockdown10.
In this study, we present the design of genome-scale MISSION esiRNA libraries and its utilization for RNAi screening exemplified by a DNA-content screen for the identification of genes involved in cell cycle progression. We show how to optimize the transfection protocol and the assay for screening in high throughput. We also demonstrate how large data-sets can be evaluated statistically and present methods to validate primary hits. Finally, we give potential starting points for further functional characterizations of validated hits.

Here we use a human esiRNA library in a high-throughput screen for genes involved in cell division. We demonstrate how to set up and conduct an esiRNA screens, as well as how to analyze and validate the results.

RNA interference (RNAi) is a basic cellular mechanism for the control of gene expression. RNAi is induced by short double-stranded RNAs also known as ...

Measurement of Heme Synthesis Levels in Mammalian Cells

Heme serves as the prosthetic group for a wide variety of proteins known as hemoproteins, such as hemoglobin, myoglobin and cytochromes. It is involved in various molecular and cellular processes such as gene transcription, translation, cell differentiation and cell proliferation. The biosynthesis levels of heme vary across different tissues and cell types and is altered in diseased conditions such as anemia, neuropathy and cancer. This technique uses [4-14C] 5-aminolevulinic acid ([14C] 5-ALA), one of the early precursors in the heme biosynthesis pathway to measure the levels of heme synthesis in mammalian cells. This assay involves incubation of cells with [14C] 5-ALA followed by extraction of heme and measurement of the radioactivity incorporated into heme. This procedure is accurate and quick. This method measures the relative levels of heme biosynthesis rather than the total heme content. To demonstrate the use of this technique the levels of heme biosynthesis were measured in several mammalian cell lines.

Altered intracellular heme levels are associated with common diseases such as cancer. Thus, there is a need to measure heme biosynthesis levels in diverse cells. The goal of this protocol is to provide a fast and sensitive method to measure and compare the levels of heme synthesis in different cells.

Heme serves as the prosthetic group for a wide variety of proteins known as hemoproteins, such as hemoglobin, myoglobin and cytochromes. It is involved in ...

Tandem High-pressure Freezing and Quick Freeze Substitution of Plant Tissues for Transmission Electron Microscopy

Since the 1940s transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has been providing biologists with ultra-high resolution images of biological materials. Yet, because of laborious and time-consuming protocols that also demand experience in preparation of artifact-free samples, TEM is not considered a user-friendly technique. Traditional sample preparation for TEM used chemical fixatives to preserve cellular structures. High-pressure freezing is the cryofixation of biological samples under high pressures to produce very fast cooling rates, thereby restricting ice formation, which is detrimental to the integrity of cellular ultrastructure. High-pressure freezing and freeze substitution are currently the methods of choice for producing the highest quality morphology in resin sections for TEM. These methods minimize the artifacts normally associated with conventional processing for TEM of thin sections. After cryofixation the frozen water in the sample is replaced with liquid organic solvent at low temperatures, a process called freeze substitution. Freeze substitution is typically carried out over several days in dedicated, costly equipment. A recent innovation allows the process to be completed in three hours, instead of the usual two days. This is typically followed by several more days of sample preparation that includes infiltration and embedding in epoxy resins before sectioning. Here we present a protocol combining high-pressure freezing and quick freeze substitution that enables plant sample fixation to be accomplished within hours. The protocol can readily be adapted for working with other tissues or organisms. Plant tissues are of special concern because of the presence of aerated spaces and water-filled vacuoles that impede ice-free freezing of water. In addition, the process of chemical fixation is especially long in plants due to cell walls impeding the penetration of the chemicals to deep within the tissues. Plant tissues are therefore particularly challenging, but this protocol is reliable and produces samples of the highest quality.

Obtaining high-quality transmission electron microscopy images is challenging, especially in the case of plant cells, which have abundant large water-filled vacuoles and aerated spaces. Tandem high-pressure freezing and quick freeze substitution greatly reduce preparation time of plant samples for TEM while producing samples with excellent ultrastructural preservation.

Since the 1940s transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has been providing biologists with ultra-high resolution images of biological materials. Yet, ...

Sample Preparation and Imaging of Exosomes by Transmission Electron Microscopy

Exosomes are nano-sized extracellular vesicles secreted by body fluids and are known to represent the characteristics of cells that secrete them. The contents and morphology of the secreted vesicles reflect cell behavior or physiological status, for example cell growth, migration, cleavage, and death. The exosomes&#39; role may depend highly on size, and the size of exosomes varies from 30 to 300 nm. The most widely used method for exosome imaging is negative staining, while other results are based on Cryo-Transmission Electron Microscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy, and Atomic Force Microscopy. The typical exosome&#39;s morphology assessed through negative staining is a cup-shape, but further details are not yet clear. An exosome well-characterized through structural study is necessary particular in medical and pharmaceutical fields. Therefore, function-dependent morphology should be verified by electron microscopy techniques such as labeling a specific protein in the detailed structure of exosome. To observe detailed structure, ultrathin sectioned images and negative stained images of exosomes were compared. In this protocol, we suggest transmission electron microscopy for the imaging of exosomes including negative staining, whole mount immuno-staining, block preparation, thin section, and immuno-gold labelling.

This protocol describes the various techniques necessary for transmission electron microscopy including negative staining, ultrathin sectioning for detailed structure, and immuno-gold labelling to determine the positions of specific proteins in exosomes.

Exosomes are nano-sized extracellular vesicles secreted by body fluids and are known to represent the characteristics of cells that secrete them. The ...

Miniaturized Sample Preparation for Transmission Electron Microscopy

Due to recent technological progress, cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) is rapidly becoming a standard method for the structural analysis of protein complexes to atomic resolution. However, protein isolation techniques and sample preparation methods for EM remain a bottleneck. A relatively small number (100,000 to a few million) of individual protein particles need to be imaged for the high-resolution analysis of proteins by the single particle EM approach, making miniaturized sample handling techniques and microfluidic principles feasible.
A miniaturized, paper-blotting-free EM grid preparation method for sample pre-conditioning, EM grid priming and post processing that only consumes nanoliter-volumes of sample is presented. The method uses a dispensing system with sub-nanoliter precision to control liquid uptake and EM grid priming, a platform to control the grid temperature thereby determining the relative humidity above the EM grid, and a pick-and-plunge-mechanism for sample vitrification. For cryo-EM, an EM grid is placed on the temperature-controlled stage and the sample is aspirated into a capillary. The capillary tip is positioned in proximity to the grid surface, the grid is loaded with the sample and excess is re-aspirated into the microcapillary. Subsequently, the sample film is stabilized and slightly thinned by controlled water evaporation regulated by the offset of the platform temperature relative to the dew-point. At a given point the pick-and-plunge mechanism is triggered, rapidly transferring the primed EM grid into liquid ethane for sample vitrification. Alternatively, sample-conditioning methods are available to prepare nanoliter-sized sample volumes for negative stain (NS) EM.
The methodologies greatly reduce sample consumption and avoid approaches potentially harmful to proteins, such as the filter paper blotting used in conventional methods. Furthermore, the minuscule amount of sample required allows novel experimental strategies, such as fast sample conditioning, combination with single-cell lysis for &#34;visual proteomics,&#34; or &#34;lossless&#34; total sample preparation for quantitative analysis of complex samples.

An instrument and methods for the preparation of nanoliter-sized sample volumes for transmission electron microscopy is presented. No paper-blotting steps are required, thus avoiding the detrimental consequences this can have for proteins, significantly reducing sample loss and enabling the analysis of single cell lysate for visual proteomics.

Due to recent technological progress, cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) is rapidly becoming a standard method for the structural analysis of protein ...

Multi-color Localization Microscopy of Single Membrane Proteins in Organelles of Live Mammalian Cells

Knowledge about the localization of proteins in cellular subcompartments is crucial to understand their specific function. Here, we present a super-resolution technique that allows for the determination of the microcompartments that are accessible for proteins by generating localization and tracking maps of these proteins. Moreover, by multi-color localization microscopy, the localization and tracking profiles of proteins in different subcompartments are obtained simultaneously. The technique is specific for live cells and is based on the repetitive imaging of single mobile membrane proteins. Proteins of interest are genetically fused with specific, so-called self-labeling tags. These tags are enzymes that react with a substrate in a covalent manner. Conjugated to these substrates are fluorescent dyes. Reaction of the enzyme-tagged proteins with the fluorescence labeled substrates results in labeled proteins. Here, Tetramethylrhodamine (TMR) and Silicon Rhodamine (SiR) are used as fluorescent dyes attached to the substrates of the enzymes. By using substrate concentrations in the pM to nM range, sub-stoichiometric labeling is achieved that results in distinct signals. These signals are localized with ~15&#8211;27 nm precision. The technique allows for multi-color imaging of single molecules, whereby the number of colors is limited by the available membrane-permeable dyes and the repertoire of self-labeling enzymes. We show the feasibility of the technique by determining the localization of the quality control enzyme (Pten)-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) in different mitochondrial compartments during its processing in relation to other membrane proteins. The test for true physical interactions between differently labeled single proteins by single molecule FRET or co-tracking is restricted, though, because the low labeling degrees decrease the probability for having two adjacent proteins labeled at the same time. While the technique is strong for imaging proteins in membrane compartments, in most cases it is not appropriate to determine the localization of highly mobile soluble proteins.

Here, we present a protocol for multi-color localization of single membrane proteins in organelles of live cells. To attach fluorophores, self-labeling proteins are used. Proteins, located in different membranes compartments of the same organelle, can be localized with a precision of ~18 nm.

Knowledge about the localization of proteins in cellular subcompartments is crucial to understand their specific function. Here, we present a ...

Biological Sample Preparation by High-pressure Freezing, Microwave-assisted Contrast Enhancement, and Minimal Resin Embedding for Volume Imaging

The described sample preparation technique is designed to combine the best quality of ultrastructural preservation with the most suitable contrast for the imaging modality in a focused ion beam scanning electron microscope (FIB-SEM), which is used to obtain stacks of sequential images for 3D reconstruction and modelling. High-pressure freezing (HPF) allows close to native structural preservation, but the subsequent freeze substitution often does not provide sufficient contrast, especially for a bigger specimen, which is needed for high-quality imaging in the SEM required for 3D reconstruction. Therefore, in this protocol, after the freeze substitution, additional contrasting steps are carried out at room temperature. Although these steps are performed in a microwave, it is also possible to follow traditional bench processing, which requires longer incubation times.The subsequent embedding in minimal amounts of resin allows for faster and more precise targeting and preparation inside the FIB-SEM. This protocol is especially useful for samples that require preparation by high-pressure freezing for a reliable ultrastructural preservation but do not gain enough contrast during the freeze substitution for volume imaging using FIB-SEM. In combination with the minimal resin embedding, this protocol provides an efficient workflow for the acquisition of high-quality volume data.

Here we present a protocol for combining two sample processing techniques, high-pressure freezing and microwave-assisted sample processing, followed by minimal resin embedding for acquiring data with a focused ion beam scanning electron microscope (FIB-SEM). This is demonstrated using a mouse tibial nerve sample and Caenorhabditis elegans.

The described sample preparation technique is designed to combine the best quality of ultrastructural preservation with the most suitable contrast for the ...

The CryoAPEX Method for Electron Microscopy Analysis of Membrane Protein Localization Within Ultrastructurally-Preserved Cells

Key cellular events like signal transduction and membrane trafficking rely on proper protein location within cellular compartments. Understanding precise subcellular localization of proteins is thus important for answering many biological questions. The quest for a robust label to identify protein localization combined with adequate cellular preservation and staining has been historically challenging. Recent advances in electron microscopy (EM) imaging have led to the development of many methods and strategies to increase cellular preservation and label target proteins. A relatively new peroxidase-based genetic tag, APEX2, is a promising leader in cloneable EM-active tags. Sample preparation for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has also advanced in recent years with the advent of cryofixation by high pressure freezing (HPF) and low-temperature dehydration and staining via freeze substitution (FS). HPF and FS provide excellent preservation of cellular ultrastructure for TEM imaging, second only to direct cryo-imaging of vitreous samples. Here we present a protocol for the cryoAPEX method, which combines the use of the APEX2 tag with HPF and FS. In this protocol, a protein of interest is tagged with APEX2, followed by chemical fixation and the peroxidase reaction. In place of traditional staining and alcohol dehydration at room temperature, the sample is cryofixed and undergoes dehydration and staining at low temperature via FS. Using cryoAPEX, not only can a protein of interest be identified within subcellular compartments, but also additional information can be resolved with respect to its topology within a structurally preserved membrane. We show that this method can provide high enough resolution to decipher protein distribution patterns within an organelle lumen, and to distinguish the compartmentalization of a protein within one organelle in close proximity to other unlabeled organelles. Further, cryoAPEX is procedurally straightforward and amenable to cells grown in tissue culture. It is no more technically challenging than typical cryofixation and freeze substitution methods. CryoAPEX is widely applicable for TEM analysis of any membrane protein that can be genetically tagged.

This protocol describes the cryoAPEX method, in which an APEX2-tagged membrane protein can be localized by transmission electron microscopy within optimally-preserved cell ultrastructure.

Key cellular events like signal transduction and membrane trafficking rely on proper protein location within cellular compartments. Understanding precise ...

Cryo-Electron Microscopic Grid Preparation for Time-Resolved Studies using a Novel Robotic System, Spotiton

The capture of short-lived molecular states triggered by the early encounter of two or more interacting particles continues to be an experimental challenge of great interest to the field of cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM). A few methodological strategies have been developed that support these &#34;time-resolved&#34; studies, one of which, Spotiton-a novel robotic system-combines the dispensing of picoliter-sized sample droplets with precise temporal and spatial control. The time-resolved Spotiton workflow offers a uniquely efficient approach to interrogate early structural rearrangements from minimal sample volume. Fired from independently controlled piezoelectric dispensers, two samples land and rapidly mix on a nanowire EM grid as it plunges toward the cryogen. Potentially hundreds of grids can be prepared in rapid succession from only a few microliters of a sample. Here, a detailed step-by-step protocol of the operation of the Spotiton system is presented with a focus on troubleshooting specific problems that arise during grid preparation.

The protocol presented here describes the use of Spotiton, a novel robotic system, to deliver two samples of interest onto a self-wicking, nanowire grid that mix for a minimum of 90 ms prior to vitrification in liquid cryogen.