Method Article
We demonstrate a method to label the walls of the retinal vasculature and adherent leukocytes. These adherent leukocytes can then be counted under a fluorescence microscope as a parameter of inflammation or the response of that inflammation to therapies.
Leukostasis refers to the attachment of leukocytes to the luminal wall of the vasculature. This interaction of leukocytes with the wall of blood vessels is characteristic of inflammation and has been causally linked to capillary occlusion in a variety of tissues and diseases, including diabetic retinopathy.
Leukostasis has been reported for years as a life-threatening complication of hyperleukocytosis and can only be diagnosed clinically. Given the importance of the phenomenon, intensive research has been done to understand the potential mechanism(s) that lead to its manifestation; however, there is no gold-standard technique in laboratory settings to visualize and quantify the severity of the event.
In the method summarized below, the vasculature is initially perfused with a buffer to remove blood, and then, concanavalin A is perfused into the vasculature where it binds to all exposed cell walls and causes especially bright staining of leukocytes. If the perfusion to remove all unbound blood cells was successful, the remaining fluorescently labeled leukocytes are bound to the vasculature, and they can be manually quantified using any available fluorescence microscope.
Leukocytes (white blood cells, WBCs) play an important role in the optimal function of the vasculature such as maintenance of the blood fluidity and regulation of thrombus resolution1. They also play a key role in some pathological conditions, such as adhering to the luminal wall of the vasculature for prolonged periods of time leading to vessel obstruction, at least temporarily, a phenomenon known as leukostasis2,3.
Diabetic retinopathy is one of the most common complications of long-term diabetes and one of the leading causes of visual impairment and blindness in the US and worldwide for individuals 20-75 years of age4. Slow and progressive degeneration of the retinal vasculature is a clinically meaningful component of the early stages of the disease, which in some patients leads to retinal ischemia with the resulting retinal neovascularization5,6. Cumulative evidence indicates that inflammation plays an important role in the development of the retinopathy7, and leukostasis is considered a subclinical intravascular inflammatory response. Leukostasis occurs in the early stages of diabetes, well before any detectable clinical manifestations have developed8,9,10. The repeated plugging of the retinal vessels by adherent leukocytes over months to years (chronic leukostasis) in diabetes might contribute to the vascular occlusion and degeneration of the capillaries11,12,13. The severity of this leukostasis is of pathologic significance and can be used to monitor the severity of the disease process or to evaluate the efficacy of a therapy in research settings.
To further study the specific effects of the hyperglycemic microenvironment on leukostasis, in vitro models have been designed. Isolated retinal microvascular endothelial cells can be grown and arranged either in 2- or 3-D cultures models (microvasculature-on-a-chip14) to replicate the vascular endothelium (the cell monolayer that paves the lumen of the vessels). However, the interexperimental variation of these models limits their use. The study of leukostasis in human retinal vasculature in vivo is still limited, and therefore, most of the current knowledge on retinal leukostasis is derived from animal models of diabetic retinopathy13,15.
The aim of this report is to describe a standard protocol based on methods described elsewhere16 for the quantification of attached leukocytes to the retinal vasculature as a parameter of leukostasis. This assay can be used to study other vascular diseases that also present leukostasis, such as malignancies3,17,18,19 and some infectious and allergic conditions20. This protocol can be implemented in any basic research laboratory without the need of specialized equipment. In the method summarized below, the vasculature is initially perfused with buffer to remove blood, and then, concanavalin A is perfused into the vasculature where it binds to all exposed cell walls and causes especially bright staining of leukocytes21,22,23. If the perfusion to remove all unbound blood cells is successful, the remaining fluorescently labeled leukocytes that are bound to the vasculature can be manually quantified using any fluorescence microscope on hand.
The protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of California Irvine and conforms to governmental regulations regarding the care and use of laboratory animals. There are no stop points in this protocol. The average time per mouse is 30 min.
1. Preparing the perfusion stage
2. Setting up the pressure infuser
3. Anesthesia
4. Transcardial perfusion and staining with concanavalin A
5. Enucleation and isolation of fresh retina
6. Flat mounting of the retina
7. Microscopy
NOTE: Any fluorescence microscope with a GFP/FITC (480/530 nm) channel can be used for this step. For this work, we used the referenced microscope with 488 channel and associated software for image acquisition.
A well-executed perfusion and staining protocol will show the complete retinal vasculature delineated with concanavalin A (Figure 1). Poor perfusion of the mouse prevents labeling of the entire vascular tree and subsequent analysis of the leukocytes adherent to the lumen (Figure 2), whereas excessive pressure from a rapid squeeze of a syringe (less than 30-35 s) can cause vascular permeability and bursting of the blood vessels (Figure 3). The extravasated concanavalin A can cause mislabeling of external structures leading to confounding quantification of the adherent leukocytes.
Evaluation of the retinal vasculature and quantification of the attached leukocytes by fluorescence microscopy should be done immediately after mounting of the retina (Figure 4). One must be careful when viewing the retina under high magnification because the bends in the capillaries can appear to be labeled leukocytes adherent to the vasculature (Figure 4B, dashed circle). Focusing the microscope up and down while observing the area in question will usually allow differentiation of leukostasis from a vessel diving into the retina. The user can change/choose the fluorophore conjugated to concanavalin A that matches the available fluorescence cube in the microscope to be used. Leukostasis in diabetic retinopathy is not a dramatic event and the researcher should evaluate the whole vascular tree by scanning the entire retina in search of adherent leukocytes. Usually, there are 1-3 leukocytes per retina of non-diabetic animals and 3-12 leukocytes per retina of diabetic animals, and such the minimum sample size to reach statistically significant difference is 10-12 animals per group (Figure 4A,B and Figure 5). Given such phenotype, it is uncommon to find 2 or more leukocytes in close proximity (Figure 4B,C). The same does not hold true for acute models of inflammation such as in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge where a robust leukostasis phenomenon is observed (Figure 4C and Figure 5). For a detailed protocol of the LPS challenge model refer to 26.
Figure 1: Representative image of a well perfused and stained retinal vasculature. Wide-field image of the retinal vasculature of a healthy C57Bl/6J mouse (4 months of age) after infusion of concanavalin A-FITC. Concanavalin A-FITC stains the total retinal vascular network uniformly if an optimal perfusion was achieved. After adjusting for brightness and contrast the image was converted to RGB. Scale bar = 100 μm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Representative image of poor perfusion and staining of the retinal vasculature. Poor perfusion of the animal might lead to limited access of the concanavalin A to the retinal vessels resulting in a deficient staining of the retinal vascular network. Extensive areas of the retina will show lack of staining (dashed rectangle), limiting the visualization of the attached leukocytes to that vasculature. Vessels that received concanavalin A might show attached leukocytes (arrows), but they do not represent the total count of the retina. When this occurs, the sample should be discarded. Deficient stating might also lead to artifictious punctate (dashed circles) due to low-quality microscopy (forced channel to detect some fluorescent signal). After adjusting for brightness and contrast the image was converted to RGB. Scale bar = 50 μm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Representative image showing bursting of the retinal capillaries. Excessive pressure from a rapid squeeze of a concanavalin A-loading syringe (less than 30-35 s) can cause experimentally induced vascular permeability and bursting of the blood vessels (dashed circles) leading to labeling of external structures or other artifacts (dashed squares). After adjusting for brightness and contrast the image was converted to RGB. Scale bar = 50 μm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Examples of a bending capillary and leukostasis in nondiabetic, diabetic, and LPS-challenged mice. Examples of retinal leukostasis in C57Bl/6J mouse (4 months of age) after infusion of concanavalin A-FITC. (A) Non-diabetic mice do not show leukostasis, but it is not uncommon to encounter 1-3 leukocytes attached to the retinal vasculature after scanning of the entire retina (arrow). (B) Attached leukocytes to retinal vasculature in diabetic mice (model of subclinical inflammation) might range from 3 to 12 and it is uncommon to find attached leukocytes in close proximity (arrows). The structure enclosed with the dash circle is an example of a bending capillary diving into the retina. (C) Challenging mice with LPS (model of acute inflammation) can be done with each experiment as positive control of leukostasis. In this model, it is common to find several leukocytes attached to the vasculature in close proximity (arrows). After adjusting for brightness and contrast, the image was converted to RGB. Scale bar = 100 μm. Abbreviation: LPS = lipopolysaccharide. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Representative graph to report results. The leukocyte count is expressed per retina and the data are graphed using mean and standard deviation. Abbreviations: N = non-diabetic; D = diabetic; LPS = lipopolysaccharide. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Leukostasis in humans refers to symptoms and clinical findings associated with hyperleukocytosis (total leukocytes (WBCs) count >100,000/µL) and is a medical emergency20. The mechanism(s) that lead to leukostasis are under intensive research. To date, the study of leukostasis in humans in vivo is not yet possible and researchers need to rely on animal models to understand this process. Different diseases present leukostasis and having a detailed protocol to visualize the phenomenon ex vivo can be useful for researchers in the laboratory. The protocol presented in this report has been optimized for the study of the retinal vasculature; however, it can be optimized empirically for the study of other suitable vascular beds such as the vasculature in the cremaster muscle27.
When performed correctly, this technique allows the perfusion and labelling of the entire retinal vascular tree and labelling and quantification of leukocytes adhering to the vascular wall. The retina is particularly suited for this method because its vasculature is restricted to defined planes in the tissue (unlike most tissues where the vasculature is less orderly). This method gives good contrast with unstained tissue when using transparent (retina) or very thin tissue (such as cremaster muscle27). Thick tissues or tissues having abundant myelinated nerves or other opaque and pigmented cells are poor sites for evaluation using this method.
A critical requirement in the procedure is good perfusion of the vasculature. Perfusing while the heart is still pumping facilitates good perfusion and labeling of the microvasculature. Poor vascular perfusion is often due to the use of cold fluids that lead to vasoconstriction, or kinking of the vasculature due to the weight and placement of the perfusion needle or forceps. While perfusing, it is important to pay close attention to the different organs during the procedure since they can provide some clues of the efficiency of the perfusion. For example, if the needle is inserted into the pulmonary vein, the lungs will fill and change color (blanching) immediately when the flow is started, suggesting that the perfusion will be suboptimal due to sequestration of all the liquids in the pulmonary tree. Blanching is observed in the tongue, kidneys, and liver during the perfusion, which might suggest an optimal procedure; however, these organs are downstream of the blood vessels that supply the eyes and therefore, the blanching of the organs guarantees a good perfusion to the body but not always to the retina.
Other potential problems that have been identified that impact the perfusion are: i) air bubbles trapped in the perfusion line that get into the microvessels and prevent perfusion with the fluorescent dye; ii) if the gavage needle inserted into the heart is extended too far into the aortic arch, it is possible to block the right carotid artery, thereby preventing flow of dye into the right retina; and iii) if perfusion is too strong, the resulting increase in intravascular pressure can lead to experimentally induced vascular permeability and might cause some leukocytes to become artifactitiously trapped in the microvasculature. Experimentally induced vascular permeability is visualized under the microscope as a localized burst of extravasated concanavalin A in the surrounding tissue of the vessel, while pathological vascular permeability presents a subtle diffuse pattern. In the first scenario, labeling of external structures or other artifacts might occur potentially confounding the quantification of adherent leukocytes. In this circumstance the observer should rely on the objective indicators that histologically define a leukocyte: shape, size and localization (inside the lumen of a vessel).
Pathological conditions that present acellular (degenerated) capillaries such as diabetic retinopathy do not preclude the use of this technique. Capillaries in early stages of degeneration, those that have lost the endothelium but mural cells are intact, are still patent, while capillaries in late stage of degeneration, although are no longer patent, they stay at their original site (focalized degeneration) and not appreciable changes are observed in the neighboring vessels 28. Both circumstances allow the labeling of the surrounding vasculature and evaluation of leukostasis.
A crucial step in the isolation of the retina is the enucleation of the eye without cutting off the back of the eye. As the optic nerve contains the incoming and outcoming blood vessels that vascularize the retinal layers and neurons, severing the optic nerve too close to its entrance to the eyeball almost guarantees that the retinal vascular tree will collapse, leading to a suboptimal view of the vasculature and the subsequent analysis of the leukostasis phenomenon. Additional attention should be paid to the razor blades used for anterior segment removal of the eye; they should be changed frequently (ideally a razor blade per 1-2 eyes) because dull blades cut poorly and might lead to pulling and tugging of the eye and retina, which in turn will damage the vasculature. When removing the anterior segment of the eye, it is suggested to rotate the eye while cutting at the limbus and remove the lens. The initial removal of the anterior segment of the eye is easier when performed on wet lint free paper; however, the paper must be removed immediately after the removal of the anterior segment, or the freshly isolated retina might attach to the paper and cannot be recovered.
We acknowledge that this protocol has several limitations. First, the initial perfusion may remove leukocytes that are loosely attached to the vasculature, leading the researcher to report an absence of leukostasis when in fact this may not be the case. Including a positive control of leukostasis, such as an acute model of inflammation26, could help to determine that the perfusion was not too harsh by showing that leukostasis is present. And second, it will be difficult for a non-trained observer to determine if the strongly fluorescent structure is in fact the cell of interest and not an artifact. To overcome this issue, the researcher should become familiar with the shape (usually round or oval at the initial attachment to the vasculature) and size (12–15 μm) of the leukocytes29. If there is doubt that the observed structure is or is not a leukocyte, it is advisable do not to include it in the quantification, but the researcher must make the final call once becomes more familiar with the assay. Ideally, automatic quantification using a specific software could facilitate the labor intensive manual quantification of the attached leukocytes to the vasculature, however, up to know, the distinction between leukocytes and artifacts can only be done by the knowledge and experience of the researcher. Developing or optimizing current platforms to quantify leukocytosis in an automatic or semiautomatic manner is an option that should be explored.
In conclusion, this validated protocol for evaluation of leukostasis might be a useful tool for researchers performing studies on diabetic retinopathy and other ocular and non-ocular vascular diseases and for testing novel therapeutical interventions.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants R01EY022938, R01EY022938-S1, and K99EY034928. The authors acknowledge services of the CWRU (P30EY11373) and UCI (P30EY034070) Visual Science Research Center Cores, as well as departmental support from an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness to the Gavin Herbert Eye Institute at the University of California Irvine.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
10 mL syringe | |||
4-way stopcock Luer lock I.V. line valve | Baxter | 2C6204 | |
Concanavalin A solution | Vector | FL-1001 | Prepare in PBS 1 mg/mL |
Dissecting tools set | Includes hemostats, scissors and forceps | ||
FIJI | Software for image processing | ||
Fluorescence microscope | Nikon | Eclipse Ni | |
Forceps, Dumont #5, Biological grade tip | Electron Microscopy Sciences (EMS) | 72700-D | |
Gavage Needle 1.25 mm OD barrel tip x 30 mm | Fine Science | 18060-20 | |
Halstead Mosquito Forceps | Fisher Scientific | 13-812-10 | |
I.V. Catheter set with regulating clamp 70 inches | Baxter | 2C5417s | |
I.V. Pole | |||
Lint free tissue | Kimpwipes is an option | ||
Micro dissecting spring scissors, Vannas, 3 mm straight | ROBOZ | RS-5620 | |
Micro spatula | Fine Science Tools (FST) | 10091-12 | |
Nikon | NIS-Elements (AR 5.30.03 64-bit) | Software for image acquisition | |
Petri dish (100 mmx15 mm) | Corning | 351029 | |
Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) | |||
Pink dental wax | Electron Microscopy Sciences (EMS) | 72670 | |
Pressure infuser | Infusurge | 4010 | |
Razor blades, GEM single edge stainless steel, Teflon coated | Electron Microscopy Sciences (EMS) | 71970 | |
Saline 0.9%, veterinary grade, 1000 mL | Baxter | 04925-04-10 | |
Small dissecting scissors, curved blunt end 22 mm | ROBOZ | RS 5983 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved