L’utilisation de Trace Eyeblink conditionnement de classique pour évaluer le dysfonctionnement hippocampique dans un modèle de Rat de Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders

Conditionnement classique de trace eyeblink (ECC) a servi à évaluer apprentissage associatif hippocampe-dépendante chez des rats adultes qui ont administré une forte concentration (11,9 % v/v) d’alcool pendant le développement précoce du cerveau néonatal. En général, les procédures ECC sont sons outils de diagnostic pour la détection de dysfonctionnement cérébral à travers de nombreux paramètres psychologiques et biomédicales.

Les rats nouveau-nés ont reçu une concentration relativement élevée de l’alcool éthylique (11,9 % v/v) pendant les jours 4 à 9, alors que le cerveau foetal subit des bouleversements organisationnels et est similaire à accéléré des changements de cerveau qui se produisent pendant le troisième trimestre chez les humains. Ce modèle de troubles du spectre de l’alcoolisation fœtale (FASDs) produit des lésions cérébrales graves, imitant le montant et le motif des beuveries qui survient chez certaines femmes enceintes alcooliques. Les auteurs décrivent l’utilisation de la trace de conditionnement eyeblink classique (ECC), une variante d’ordre supérieur d’apprentissage associatif, afin d’évaluer le dysfonctionnement hippocampique à long terme qui est généralement observée chez la progéniture adultes exposés à l’alcool. 90 jours après la naissance, les rongeurs ont été préparés chirurgicalement avec enregistrement et électrodes stimulants, qui mesure électromyographique (EMG) clignotent l’activité du muscle de la paupière gauche et livré léger choc postérieur de l’oeil gauche, respectivement. Après une période de récupération de 5 jours, ils ont subi de 6 sessions de trace ECC pour déterminer les différences d’apprentissage associatif entre les exposés à l’alcool et les rats témoins. Trace ECC est l’une des nombreuses procédures ECC possibles qui peuvent être facilement modifiés en utilisant le même matériel et le logiciel, afin que différents systèmes neuronaux peuvent être évalués. Procédures de l’ECC en général, peuvent servir comme outils de diagnostic pour détecter la pathologie neuronale dans des systèmes différents de cerveau et des conditions différentes qui insultent le cerveau.

It is quite hard to imagine that in today's day and age with better health care and access to health services, alcohol abuse remains a major global health concern. Unfortunately, it has been shown that an expectant mother who drinks a high amount of alcohol can have a child with severe brain damage and neurodevelopmental disorders that last a lifetime, as evident in those afflicted with fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS)^1,2,3. In women with some confirmed history of maternal alcohol use, the developing fetus is also susceptible to small amounts of alcohol or different patterns of alcohol consumption that produce varying differences in blood alcohol concentrations. In this latter case, while the children may not exhibit the severe morphological or neurobehavioral disruptions as those with FAS, they may still exhibit lifelong cognitive disabilities and emotional disturbances that range from mild to severe^3,4. Altogether, FAS and less severe forms of prenatal alcohol-mediated disruptions constitute a collection of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASDs). It is no surprise that FASDs are completely preventable, but astonishingly estimates show that in populations where alcohol abuse is quite common, they remain the primary non-genetic cause of neural and cognitive disability, affecting about 2% to 5% of young US children and those in European countries such as France and Sweden. With respect to the incidence of FAS alone within the US, the prevalence is 2 to 7 per 1,000 live births⁵, implying that the overall incidence of FASDs to be much higher than that for FAS.

Neuroimaging studies conducted in children with FASDs have shown that they display brain abnormalities, such as a thinner corpus callosum⁶, smaller anterior cerebellar vermis⁷, and smaller hippocampus⁸. These brain abnormalities underlie some of the long-term neurocognitive disruptions observed in children with FASDs. The exact links that tie variations in maternal alcohol-mediated brain changes and variations in the profile (i.e., type, extent) of particular neurocognitive impairments have yet to be clearly determined. But as a starting point, the hippocampus is an excellent candidate for determining its susceptibility to prenatal alcohol effects. Indeed, children with FASDs exhibit deficits in hippocampal-mediated behaviors such as place learning^9,10 and delayed object recall¹¹.

Rodent models of FASDs have proven to be invaluable in elucidating the mechanisms leading to neurocognitive disruptions seen in children with FASDs. A well-established binge-exposure model that we have adopted involves delivering alcohol to rats during postnatal days 4-9^12,13, a period when the brain undergoes rapid synapse and dendritic contact formation, comparable to human fetal week 24 and extending into the 3^rd trimester^14,15,16,17. This particular model induces significant loss of hippocampal neurons^18,19 and neurons in many other brain regions such as the cerebellum^{12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23}, accompanied by severe impairments in cognitive functions spanning different domains^21,24,25. Cognitive disruption from early alcohol exposure in rats may be assessed in different ways, particularly with eyeblink classical conditioning (ECC). ECC is a paradigm that has been utilized for more than a century to scientifically investigate the fundamental basis of learning^26,27 and as such, provides a useful method to better understanding the adverse neurocognitive consequences resulting from fetal alcohol exposure. It is a very flexible paradigm that allows investigators to use a variety of different ECC procedures, any of which can be examined across many mammalian species ascending the phylogenetic scale (from mice to humans) and over different courses of brain development^28,29,30,31. Furthermore, the fundamental neural circuits that mediate associative learning in this paradigm are supported by experimental and neuropsychological reports in these same species^{26,32,33,34,35,36,37}.

One form of ECC, trace ECC is demonstrated in this paper (Figure 1). To provide context, it is compared against the more traditional form - delay ECC. The ECC paradigm was modeled after classical conditioning using dogs, first carried out by the Nobel-Prize winning physiologist, Ivan Pavlov. Pavlov discovered that certain stimuli such as tones do not naturally elicit salivation, but when it precedes and overlaps with the delivery of food, the salivary response can be strengthened from repeated presentations of the two, provided that this tone-food contingency is maintained. This is an example of delay ECC, with the notion that associative strength is mediated by immediate temporal contiguity between the two stimuli, thus making learning conditions optimal for an animal. He also tested other variations of the tone-food contingency, such as turning the tone off and leaving a "trace" period before delivering the food. When these two stimuli were discontiguous enough, it became much harder for the dogs to emit salivation responses prior to the delivery of the food. The discontiguity between the tone being turned off and the delivery of the food is thus an example of trace ECC. As rodents do not naturally salivate to the presence of food, more species-relevant stimuli such as mild shock are used instead; they also do not naturally emit defensive eyeblink responses to tones. With this backdrop, rodent ECC procedures involve presenting a tone at a given decibel level and pairing it in some fashion with mild shock to either the eyelid muscle (orbicularis oculi) or the temporalis muscle to elicit an eyeblink response. The tone is considered a conditioned stimulus (CS) while the shock is considered an unconditioned stimulus (US). In delay ECC, the CS is presented first; this stimulus remains on for a given duration. Afterwards, the US is delivered. These two stimuli overlap for a given duration, and then both terminate simultaneously; the resultant eyeblink response emitted due to the US is considered an unconditioned response (UR). In this procedure, rodents learn to emit eyeblink responses sometime after the CS is presented, but just before the US, in order to anticipate this aversive stimulus. The learned eyeblink response is referred to as a conditioned response (CR). For trace ECC, the CS and US are separated by a period of time that is void of stimuli known as a trace interval; they do not overlap in time as in delay ECC. During this interval, the animal is tasked to resolve the associational requirements between stimuli. Similar to delay ECC, learning occurs when the animal consistently emits a blink response after the CS turns off, but immediately before delivery of the US. Over some amount of acquisition training (CS paired with US), learning curves (i.e., based on different CR measurements) develop. Lesion and neuroimaging studies show that successful learning in delay ECC is dependent on having intact cerebellar-brain stem neuro-circuitry^38,39,40, whereas trace ECC is a higher-order procedure that requires additional neural engagement from the hippocampus^41,42,43,44 and other cortical structures^45,46. Because of the timing-related requirements needed in order to acquire trace CRs successfully, this task is also more difficult to learn (even for normal subjects).

Figure 1: Trace eyeblink classical conditioning. An actual waveform is shown that is representative of an adult rat in the unintubated-control (UC) group. The tone CS (85 dB, 2.8 kHz) is first presented for 380 ms. A trace interval of 500 ms ensues, where no stimuli are present. Afterwards a shock US (1.6 mA) is delivered for 100 ms. Successful learning in this task occurs when the frequency (%) or amplitude (in volts) of eyeblinks during the conditioned response (CR) time window (Total CR period) increases over many sessions of training. In particular, rodents with an intact hippocampus will usually emit more well-timed CRs (Adaptive CRs) just prior to the onset of the shock US (within a 200-ms window). Startle responses (SRs) during the first 80 ms after tone CS onset and unconditioned responses (URs) are also measured. Non-associative SRs are typically low or nonexistent in well-trained rodents, while URs are expected to be high in frequency and amplitude. This task requires that the rodent learn to bridge the association between the CS offset and US onset (during the trace interval), therefore making it inherently more difficult to acquire compared to delay ECC. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Here we demonstrate the adverse functional consequences of neonatal alcohol exposure that is delivered in a binge-like manner, as assessed by a trace ECC procedure that delivers an 85 dB tone CS (2.8 kHz) which remains on for 380 ms, followed by a 1.6 mA shock US which remains on for 100 ms, and these stimuli are separated by a trace period of 500 ms. We have reported on the utility of this behavioral assay in previous studies examining choline intervention and iron supplementation in mitigating the effects of neonatal alcohol exposure^18,47. Indeed, trace ECC can be used as a diagnostic tool to assess neonatal alcohol-induced hippocampal pathology. The advantage it has over delay ECC is that it is more sensitive to detecting disturbances in hippocampal function, which is compromised in humans with FASDs.

Demonstration of ECC extends far outside the fetal alcohol field. Many variants of ECC (e.g., delay, trace, compound, reversal) can be used to elucidate ontogenetic differences in learning across development, the neurobiological basis of associative learning in normal mammals, as well as the vulnerabilities of different brain systems to many challenges, including (but not limited to) teratogens, environmental toxins, traumatic brain injury, neurodegenerative diseases, and psychiatric conditions.

NOTE: All procedures were approved and carried out in accordance with the policies set forth by the East Carolina University IACUC. Long-Evans rats were generated from females mated with male breeders. Pups from all three treatment groups (see 1.1) were generated within a litter from the same dam. Five litters were produced and each litter was culled to 8 pups on postnatal day (PD) 3. The remaining two pups from each litter were assigned to separate experiments. Both male and female offspring (one per exposure group) were included in the study. A total of N = 27 adult offspring were examined in this study; 3 rats were excluded due to broken 3T wire leads (see 3.1.1) which were irreparable on Day 1 of ECC training.

1. Preparation of Groups, Materials, and Solutions

1. On PD 3, remove pups from the dam and place them on a thermo-regulated water heating pad to keep warm. Use a random selection procedure to place rat pups into one of three groups: (1) alcohol-intubated (AI); (2) sham-intubated control (SI); or (3) unintubated-control (UC). Carry out approved procedures for identification, such as [non-toxic] ink tattooing of their paws with a 30G x 1/2 in needle following a numbering scheme. Return the pups to the dam when finished with tattooing.
2. Prepare an intragastric intubation tube(s) using polyethylene (PE) size 50 and 10. The overall length of this tube is user-dependent and can be adjusted accordingly.
   1. Use micro dissecting scissors to cut a 3 in piece of PE-50 tubing and a 6 in piece of PE-10 tubing.
   2. Carefully attach the PE-50 tubing to a sterile 22 G x 1 in hypodermic needle.
   3. Insert one end of the PE-10 tubing into the open end of the PE-50 tubing. A diagonal cut may be needed at the tip of the PE-10 tubing in order to direct it into the PE-50 tubing.
   4. Cut a small piece of PE-50 tubing (about 2-3 mm) and insert it on the open end of the PE-10 tube. This will serve as a visual stopper.
   5. Store the complete intragastric intubation tube in fresh 70% isopropyl alcohol to keep it sterile.
3. Carry out aseptic procedures to prepare a stock milk solution in 50 mL bottles. The stock milk solution is based on a diet formula first established by West et al. (1984)⁴⁸. Store the bottles at -18 °C until time of use. Thaw two bottles of milk using warm water prior to use.
   1. Draw out 7.16 mL of 95% ethyl alcohol (USP) using a sterile syringe and add it to one 50 mL milk bottle. This makes an 11.9% v/v alcohol solution that is delivered to rat pups over the first two feedings of the day (see 2.1.1); the total daily dose of alcohol is 5.25 g/kg/day. It is designed to deliver the alcohol in a volume (0.0278 mL/g per feeding) in enriched milk solution.
      NOTE: This amount can be adjusted based on litter size and expected usage over 3-4 days. The amount of alcohol added must also be adjusted in order to make an 11.9% v/v solution.
   2. Shake this bottle well and label it accordingly (i.e., 11.9% v/v Ethyl Alcohol in Milk).
   3. Label the second bottle of milk (without alcohol added) accordingly (e.g., Milk-Only) and use it for supplemental feedings as indicated in 2.1.1.
   4. Store both milk bottles in the refrigerator.

2. Neonatal Alcohol Exposure (Postnatal Days 4-9)

1. Give AI and SI pups 4 total intubations per day starting on PD 4. Separate each intubation by 2 h. Because AI pups are intubated with an actual solution, each of their intubations are considered feedings.
   1. Intubate the AI pups with the 11.9% v/v Ethyl Alcohol in Milk solution during the first two feedings of the day, and then intubate them with the Milk-Only solution during the last two feedings of the day to supplement their growth.
   2. Intubate the SI pups 4 times without any solution every two hours, ensuring the same duration of PE-10 tube exposure that AI pups endure. The UC group does not receive any intubations.
2. Remove pups from the dam and place them on a thermo-regulated water heating pad to keep warm. Weigh each pup and record its body weight (in g). Refer to a pre-made feeding chart to determine the intubation volume for each AI pup and note it in a record sheet.
   1. Place the 11.9% v/v Ethyl Alcohol in Milk solution in a warm water bath and shake it well.
   2. Intragastric intubation procedure:
      1. Flush out the intragastric intubation tube that was stored in 70% isopropyl alcohol well with warm water.
      2. Extract the correct amount of solution using a sterile 1 mL syringe.
      3. Dip the tip of the intubation tube (PE-10 end) in fresh corn oil (this facilitates insertion).
      4. Measure the length of the PE-10 tube from the pup's mouth to its stomach. Adjust the PE-50 stopper to guide with the stopping point.
      5. Carefully insert the PE-10 tube into the pup's mouth, proceeding down its esophagus, slightly passing through the gastroesophageal sphincter, and into its stomach. Examine the pup, stabilize it, and depress the syringe plunger to deliver the solution. Do this at a slow rate.
         NOTE: To avoid accidentally inserting the tube into the trachea, first direct the tube so that it curves and makes contact with the soft palate prior to proceeding forward. Use the palate as a guide, as the tube will naturally deflect off this region and be guided down the esophagus. Otherwise, any substantial deviation of the tip ventrally may cause it to enter into the trachea. It is best to remove the tube and not to proceed with the intubation if one is not certain about its entry position - reinsert the tube correctly on the next attempt.
      6. Carefully remove the PE-10 tubing and examine the pup for backwash of solution, blood, or physical injury. Replace pup with its littermates if it is fine. The entire intubation procedure takes approximately less than 1 min for each pup and approximately 4 min total for the 4 intubation-treated pups in each litter (2 AI, 2 SI).
      7. Intragastric intubation procedure for SI pups: Follow the same PE-10 insertion procedure as that for AI pups, but without any solution for the same duration (1 min).
      8. Return all pups back to the dam immediately after completing procedures for the last pup in the litter. Return the dam to the vivarium until the next feeding session (in 2 h).
      9. Flush out the intragastric intubation tube with warm sterile water and replace it in 70% isopropyl alcohol for storage. Flush the tube well with water prior to each feeding session.
      10. Repeat 2.2 (except weighing pups) to 2.2.2.9 for the second feeding session. At the last two feedings, intubate the AI pups with the Milk-Only solution using the same intubation volumes determined in 2.2.
3. Weigh the rats at regular intervals such as on PD 15 (when eyes open), PD 21 (weaning), PD 30, PD 60, and PD 90 (surgery) to obtain representative growth curves.

3. Fabrication and Modification of Electrodes

1. Fabricate one electromyographic (EMG) "headstage" for each rat (Figure 2). The headstage allows for recording of eyeblink responses via the eyeblink system (Figure 4).
   1. Construct a headstage that consists of two size 3T polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-coated stainless steel wires (5 cm each), one size 10T PTFE-coated stainless steel wire (5 cm), three male contact pins, and one micro strip socket insulator that is cut-down to 3 holes (see 3.1.4).
   2. Strip off the PTFE coating from the 10T wire by grasping the center with a serrated high precision tweezer and removing the coating in both directions with the smooth high precision tweezer. Ensure that all traces of coating have been removed from this wire.
      1. Crimp one end of the 10T wire to a contact pin with a serrated platform dental plier; this will serve as a ground wire. Hold a 3T wire carefully with the smooth high precision tweezer 1 to 1.5 mm from one end. Strip off the 1 to 1.5 mm PTFE coating while leaving the rest of the coating intact. Crimp a contact pin to the exposed end of the 3T wire.
      2. Carry out the same procedures for the second 3T wire. Both wires will serve as the positive and negative leads of the EMG recording electrodes.
   3. Perform tug tests on all wires to ensure that they are secured to the pins. Take caution not to bend or damage the wires.
   4. Cut a segment of a socket insulator strip down to 3.5 holes (cut the middle of the fourth hole) with the cutting blade of a wire stripper. Scale down this segment to just 3 full holes and sand-down both sides if necessary. This helps to ensure that 3 full holes are available. Insert pin-wire units into the three holes of the micro strip until the crimped ends are flushed with the bottom edge of the insulator segment. The 10T assembly needs to be in one outer hole of the micro strip and not in the middle.
2. Modify bipolar stimulating electrodes (Figure 2).
   1. Give each rat one bipolar stimulating electrode. This electrode applies a small amount of electrical current via a stimulus isolator (see eyeblink system) as the shock US during ECC. The electrodes are acquired from a manufacturer in twisted form and are shielded.
   2. Untwist the two metal leads 2-3 times to make a V-shape (spread 5 mm) and then use the smooth high precision tweezer to straighten each "prong" as much as possible. Scrape off 1 mm of shielding from each prong's tip (all around) with a razor blade. Inspect each prong for irregularities and bends, and correct if necessary without scraping off additional shielding.
3. Remove manufacturing oil and foreign debris from the EMG headstages and bipolar electrodes by washing them in 95% ethyl alcohol. Allow them to dry then autoclave.

Figure 2: Electromyographic (EMG) recording electrodes and bipolar electrode. The finished EMG headstage (right, orange) is constructed from three male contact pins, two size 3T PTFE-coated wires, one size 10T PTFE-coated wire, and a modified micro strip. The three wires are approximately 5 cm each and are crimped to the contact pins. The finished bipolar electrode (right, white) is untwisted, re-straightened, and molded in a V-shape (5 mm split). Shielding is removed from the tips of the two prongs. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

4. Eyelid Surgery Procedure (Postnatal Day 90)

1. Preparation of materials (see Materials for detailed supply information), animals, surgical, and non-surgical areas:
   1. Autoclave surgical instruments and supplies - the number in parentheses ( ) indicates approximately how much is needed per adult rat or measurement: surgical instruments (1 set per 4 rats, as approved by the ECU IACUC), gauze pads (3-4), cotton-tipped swabs (5-6), 20 x 20 wrap (4 per/surgery session), porcelain crucible (1), stainless steel microspatula (1), 0.9% saline (1 wash bottle), Petri dish (1), and 0-80 stainless steel screws (3/rat).
   2. Other sterile supplies needed: surgical blade size 10 (1 per 4 rats), surgical drape (1 per rat), veterinary ophthalmic ointment, povidone-iodine (1 wash bottle), 26G x 3/8" hypodermic needle (2), nickel-plated pin vise with #55 drill bit, nickel-plated flathead jeweler's screwdriver (1.8-2 mm blade).
   3. Prepare a sterile holding area for all surgical tools and supplies using an approved research/medical grade disinfectant. Place materials on this space when the area is ready.
   4. Prepare a sterile surgical space using an approved research/medical grade disinfectant. This space contains a thermo-regulated water heating pad, stereotaxic apparatus fitted with a rat anesthesia mask, glass bead sterilizer, and isoflurane gas vaporizer (for anesthesia). The vaporizer has tubes to the anesthesia mask and to an induction chamber located on a separate space for non-sterile animal preparation procedures; each tube is controlled by its own valve.
   5. Scrub hands and arms thoroughly with antimicrobial soap. Without touching the inside, pre-open any items that have been packaged in sterilization pouches or wraps. Don sterile gloves using aseptic procedure and transfer all pertinent items to the surgical area. Set the drill bit at the proper depth in the pin vise (~ 2 mm) and prepare the screwdriver. Cover the sterile materials with a sterile wrap until the surgery is ready to begin.
   6. Prepare a non-sterile space with a weighing scale, electric fur trimmer, sterile 1 mL syringes with 26G x 3/8 in needles (1 per rat), surgery log, and buprenorphine (0.03 mg/mL concentration) administered 0.1 mL/100 grams.
      CAUTION: Buprenorphine is a DEA schedule III semisynthetic opioid, and must be locked and logged appropriately.
   7. Check the isoflurane vaporizer for appropriate gas level; add more gas if it is low. Leave the gas flow and mixture knobs off for now. Turn on the O₂ tank and check that there will be enough gas for all surgeries.
   8. Weigh each rat and record its body weight in the surgery log. Use a buprenorphine injection chart to determine the proper injection volume.
   9. Turn on the vaporizer valve to the induction chamber and leave the valve to the surgery mask off. Turn the mixture to 3 and flow rate to 3 (3% isoflurane with 100% O₂ as the carrier gas at a volume of 3 L/min).
   10. Place a rat in the induction chamber and allow it to reach proper anesthetic plane (slow breathing, lack of pedal reflex, lack of blink reflex). Remove the rat from the chamber once it has reached anesthetic plane.
   11. Shave its head using the fur trimmer, exposing a sufficient amount of skin for the incision site and the left eyelid. If necessary, place it back in the induction chamber to reach anesthetic plane again before resuming with the trimming.
   12. Disinfect the exposed skin by applying alternating rubs of isopropyl alcohol and povidone-iodine three times. If necessary, place it back in the induction chamber to reach anesthetic plane again, prior to transferring to the surgery table.
2. Surgery
   1. Turn on the vaporizer valve to the anesthesia mask and shut off the valve to the induction chamber. Adjust the mixture to 2.5 and flow rate to 2 (2.5% isoflurane with 100% O₂ as the carrier gas at a volume of 2 L/min). Transfer the rat to the stereotaxic apparatus and follow standard procedures in securing its head to the incisor bar and ear bars (see Geiger et al., 2008⁴⁹ for an example).
   2. Give the rat a pre-surgical injection of buprenorphine (SC) and carefully dispose of the needle (uncapped) in a sharps container. Place a sterile surgical drape on the rat, exposing just the surgical area and isolating it from the rest of the body.
   3. Don a surgical mask, surgical cap, surgical gown, goggles, and any other personal protective equipment required by the IACUC. Wash and scrub hands and arms thoroughly with antimicrobial soap. Don sterile gloves using sterile procedure.
   4. Apply a small amount of ophthalmic ointment to both eyes using a cotton-tipped swab to prevent them from drying.
   5. Proceed with the surgery when the rat exhibits proper anesthetic plane. Monitor the rat continuously throughout the surgery and check the isoflurane level periodically. Adjust the flow and mixture knobs accordingly during surgery based on the rat's response to the anesthesia.
   6. Make an anterior-posterior incision at the midline of the cranium with a scalpel blade. This incision should expose enough area in front of the eyes (i.e., exposing the frontal bone) and slightly behind the lambdoid suture.
   7. Scrape away the periosteum on top of the cranium carefully not to cause excessive bleeding. Wipe off excess connective tissue and blood with a cotton-tipped swab.
   8. Drill a hole using the drill bit with the aid of a pin vise, starting directly behind the coronal suture on one parietal bone. Remove any blood and bone debris with a cotton-tipped swab. Grasp a 0-80 screw by the threading with splinter forceps and fasten it to the hole with the jeweler's screwdriver; tighten-down the screw just enough without damaging cortical brain tissue (usually 3-4 full turns).
   9. Follow the same procedures described in 4.2.8 to fasten two more 0-80 screws to the skull, one directly behind the coronal suture of the opposite parietal bone and one directly anterior to the right lambdoid suture. It has been found that 3 screws are sufficient for anchoring the dental cement (see 4.2.18) to the cranium, as a fourth screw (anterior to the left lambdoid suture) would impede the placement of the bipolar electrode.
   10. Remove an EMG headstage from the Petri dish. Face the headstage so that the 10T wire is on the rat's right side. Bend the 10T wire upward, making it parallel with the bottom edge of the micro strip. Give it a slight bend to the right side so that the wire can come around the anterior and posterior 0-80 screws. Set it aside but close enough to reach.
   11. [Assuming one is right-handed] Place 3 in dressing forceps in the left hand and 4 in dressing forceps in the right hand. Grasp the upper skin at the incision site of its left eye with the 4 in dressing forceps and direct the 3 in dressing forceps towards the corner of this eye; grasp the skin at this corner. Maintain the grasp with the 3 in dressing forceps while releasing the 4 in dressing forceps.
   12. Take one 26G x 3/8 in needle and insert it through the corner of the eyelid; rotate the needle so that the beveled side is face-up. Use the micro dissecting forceps with platform to insert the middle 3T wire into the needle's hole. Push it through the hole a few centimeters without going down completely; this wire is the negative lead.
   13. Carry out the procedures described in 4.2.11 and 4.2.12 to insert the outside 3T wire into the middle portion of the eyelid; this wire is the positive lead.
   14. Grasp both needles with one hand while grasping the headstage with the other hand (or forceps). Pull the needles away from the eyelid while guiding the headstage in the same direction in one continuous movement. If necessary, rotate the headstage so that the 10T wire is towards the animal's right eye; do not allow the 3T wires to cross. Use fine tipped forceps to double-check that the positive lead is in the middle of the eyelid.
   15. Adjust the headstage so that it is centered between the eyes and is in an optimal position atop the frontal bone, anterior to the bilaterally-inserted screws. Hold the headstage with one hand and hold the 3 in dressing forceps with the other hand. Wrap the 10T wire around one or both screws on the 10T side.
   16. Place 3 in dressing forceps in one hand and 4 in dressing forceps in the other hand. Use the 3 in dressing forceps to grasp the skin at the incision site towards the left temple. Use the 4 in dressing forceps to create a small "pocket" by separating the skin (i.e., superficial fascia) from the temporalis muscle. Use the iris scissors to cut away more connective tissue, working in towards the corner of the left eye, to increase the size of this pocket. Be careful not to go in too deep or cut any blood vessels.
   17. Take a bipolar electrode and shape the wire leads so that they can be fitted along the curvature of the temporalis muscle, while the two prongs are situated (dorsal and ventral) posterior to the left eye (see video), and the bottom end of the bipolar electrode can be situated straight atop the cranium. Allow enough distance between the headstage and this electrode for the commutator cable plugs (Figure 3) to attach without impediment.
   18. Pour dental cement powder into the crucible - start with about 1/3 of the crucible, and then scale the amount as necessary. Add the liquid component until the consistency is watery, and mix these components with the spatula. When the cement's consistency becomes more viscous, apply it to the incision site - covering all edges of the skin with at least 1/8 in borders.
       1. Apply enough cement to fortify the headstage and bipolar electrode without preventing the rat from closing both of its eyes. Quickly wipe off any cement that drips onto unwanted areas of the rat's fur.
   19. Ensure that at least 4-5 threads of the bipolar electrode are left unsealed by cement so that the bipolar plug can be twisted on (Figure 3). Remove excess cement from the headstage - the top of the micro strip and the three contact pins must be clean. The cement hardens quickly and may easily prevent full coupling of any of these electrodes to the commutator cable plugs. Use splinter forceps to remove excess cement that has partly dried.
   20. Wait for the cement to harden; it becomes clear. Use the micro dissecting scissors to snip off excess length from the two 3T wires, leaving a few centimeters of working room.
   21. Grab the micro dissecting forceps with platform on the left hand while grabbing the micro dissecting forceps with fine points on the right hand. Grasp one 3T wire with the left forceps slightly in front of the eyelid. With the right forceps, push the eyelid up to expose more 3T wire and hold it there. Release the left forceps and use the left hand to grasp the headstage (ensure it is secure by now). Use the right forceps to strip off some PTFE shielding, which allows the wire to make contact with the orbicularis oculi muscle.
       NOTE: Take caution not to pull too hard on a 3T wire, as it may detach from the contact pin. If a wire detaches, then it will not be possible to replace the contact pin as the hardened cement will not release freely from the cranium without causing bone breakage.
   22. Perform the steps in 4.2.21 to strip off excess PTFE from the second 3T wire.
   23. Grab the two micro dissecting forceps as stated in 4.2.21 (with platform on left, fine points on right). Position the left forceps slightly in front of one 3T wire while leaving room for the right forceps to be positioned directly in front of the eyelid. Grasp the wire with both forceps.
       1. Create a "hook" by keeping the right forceps still and rotating the left forceps up and around towards the eyelid; do this in one motion. Carefully release the right forceps, and then the left forceps.
          NOTE: Hooking the electrodes on the eyelids help to minimize the possibility of them rubbing onto the cornea. This also minimizes the possibility for wire breakage during any point in the behavioral testing phase. While hooking does not fully prevent the wire from rubbing against the cornea for all animals, they typically show no signs of eye damage as reflected by their high blink amplitudes (measured by the digital oscilloscope in 5.1.7) and from daily post-surgical health observations (excessive tearing, partial eyelid closure, lack of mobility from eye damage). If a rat shows initial signs of discomfort, it is anesthetized with isoflurane (see 4.1.10) and its electrodes are re-examined and/or re-positioned. Ophthalmic ointment is applied to prevent the cornea from drying. The rat is observed daily for any post-procedural eye complications and should they persist, then seek veterinary care. Rats that exhibit severe eye complications which cannot be corrected with electrode re-positioning or with veterinary treatment, are humanely euthanized according to the standard operating procedures of the ECU IACUC.
   24. Perform the steps in 4.2.23 for the second 3T wire. Snip off excess wire using the micro dissecting scissors.
   25. Use one hand to release the rat from the ear bars while supporting its body with the other hand. Inspect its head for any blood or debris, clean up if necessary, and give it a post-operative injection of buprenorphine.
   26. Place the rat in a recovery bin that has a source of heat (such as a thermo-regulated water heating pad) to aid recovery. Mark in the surgery end time in the surgery log and any pertinent notes about the rat during surgery. Monitor the rat for proper respiration and when it exhibits sternal recumbency or moves about, it may be returned to its home cage.
   27. Re-sterilize the instruments (except micro dissecting forceps - as they may be damaged) using the bead sterilizer and ensure that the surgical area remains aseptic, and repeat aseptic procedures if multiple eyelid surgeries will be performed.

5. Trace Eyeblink Classical Conditioning Procedure

Figure 3: Modified operant conditioning box for eyeblink conditioning. Rats are freely-moving mammals, and therefore a rotating commutator is used for maintaining electrical signal contact from the EMG and bipolar plugs that are attached to the head. The commutator is attached to the arm of the stanchion, which is counter-weighted for alleviating pressure on the rat. A piezo tweeter (speaker) delivers a 2.8 kHz tone at 85 dB and these values are calibrated regularly. Acoustical foam assists with attenuating environmental noise. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Eyeblink conditioning system. This custom-built system consists of an EMG Integrator unit that filters and amplifies incoming signals from the rats, a Stimulus Control unit that delivers various stimuli in addition to tones and shocks, a pre-amplifier for each operant box to increase EMG signal gain, and a stimulus isolator for each operant box; it provides varying shock levels (in mA). A digital oscilloscope (not part of the stock eyeblink system) is used for diagnostic purposes during habituation and acquisition. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

1. Begin habituation and acquisition training 5 days after surgery. Give each rat one day of handling and habituation to the training apparatus - consisting of a modified operant conditioning box that is housed in a larger sound-attenuated chamber (Figure 3) - and follow with 6 days of acquisition training. Carry out the habituation and acquisition sessions using a custom-built eyeblink system (Figure 4).
   1. Create a training log file and print it out to use for daily record keeping. This log should have the squad of rats pre-assigned pseudo-randomly (or other randomization method) to their training boxes.
   2. Power on the eyeblink system, computer, and run the eyeblink software. This version of the software has different modules (or applications) that run independently. Run the Animal module to create a *.RAT file that contains subject information (session number, animal ID, sex, weight, and box number). A single RAT file manages up to four rats, which comprises a squad of subjects. Enter the values accordingly and save the file. Create a separate RAT file for each squad of rats to be trained.
   3. Transfer the rats from their vivarium to the testing room and close the door. Handle each rat for 5 min.
   4. Transfer a rat to its designated box and connect the EMG and bipolar plugs from the commutator cable to the corresponding EMG headstage and bipolar electrode on its head.
      NOTE: On first exposure to the commutator cable, a rat may struggle and show signs of stress. Handle the rat carefully and allow breaks in between unsuccessful attachments to alleviate its stress.
   5. Use a commutator that rotates 360° while maintaining electrical signal delivery/reception as a rat moves freely within a box. It has 5 channels (3 for the EMG electrodes, 2 for the bipolar electrodes) leading into the EMG Integrator unit, which filters and amplifies the raw signal.
   6. Determine that the rat is moving freely, and that it is not hindered by the weight of the commutator cable assembly or stanchion arm. Adjust the counter weight at the back of the stanchion if necessary. Check that all plugs are secure then close the box door. Perform the same connection/check procedure for all rats.
   7. Use an oscilloscope to observe their EMG activity for abnormal signals (e.g., high frequency and/or high amplitude electrical activity) and a video surveillance system to check their status (e.g., motor activity, sensitivity to environment, signs of pain) if available. Note any problems that are observed in the training log.
   8. Allow rats to habituate to their chambers for 10 min, and then return them to their homecages.
   9. Clean and disinfect the operant boxes, sweep the floor, and clean the table(s). Carry out these procedures after every session.
2. Acquisition training occurs over 6 consecutive days (sessions).
   1. Day 1: Transfer a rat to its designated box and connect the EMG and bipolar plugs from the commutator cable to the corresponding EMG headstage and bipolar electrode on its head. Carry out the same procedures indicated in 5.1.6 and 5.1.7.
   2. Turn on the stimulus isolators and set the current to be delivered at 0.4 mA (4% of 10 mA as shown in video). The isolators deliver electrical current in alternating fashion (i.e., from trial to trial), between the dorsal and ventral prongs of the bipolar electrode. This helps reduce muscle fiber fatigue (at each muscle site) over repeated stimulus deliveries.
   3. Observe all eyeblink responses emitted and tolerances exhibited on each trial for all rats. After every second trial, increase the shock US intensity by 0.4 mA for each rat, until 1.6 mA is reached (on Trials 7 and 8). Double-check that all rats are responding normally in their boxes, that all amplification and gain settings are constant, and for proper electrical signals (i.e., low/little EMG noise) coming from them. Use a shock US intensity of 1.6 mA for all days of acquisition training.
      NOTE: If a rat exhibits pain to a given shock level (e.g., jumping high off the floor, climbing on walls, running around), the trial is paused and it will be returned to the previous mA setting (0.4 mA below) for two trials. Afterwards, the rat will receive the higher shock value that it did not tolerate again and if tolerance is shown, it will receive increasing values until 1.6 mA is reached. If it cannot tolerate any value, then the next lower value (in 0.4 increments) at which it tolerates will be used throughout training.
   4. Use an oscilloscope to observe their EMG activity for abnormal signals (e.g., high frequency and/or high amplitude electrical activity) and a video surveillance system to check their status (e.g., motor activity, sensitivity to environment, signs of pain).
      NOTE: Explanation of Trace ECC: A representative trial epoch with captured EMG waveforms is illustrated in Figure 1 and the trace ECC procedure is explained in detail in the video. The trace conditioning training file is set to deliver 100 trials (90 paired CS-US trials and 10 CS-only trials on every 10^th trial) with an average inter-trial interval of 30 sec. The entire training session lasts approximately 52 min (assuming no stoppages). All rats are naïve in Session 1 and will develop differential learning curves (as determined by the expression of CRs) as they progress through several days of training.
   5. Start the training: Run the Blink software module. When prompted, select the correct RAT file and the training file for "trace" eyeblink conditioning.
   6. Write down the start time and the experimenter's name in the training log. Monitor all activity at this point: proper EMG signals, good blink responses to the shock US (i.e., high/frequent URs), health status of the animals, and proper hardware function. Write any noteworthy remarks in the training log.
   7. Data collection is captured automatically by the software as RAW files (one per rat, per day). The RAW files contain EMG amplitude (in volts), frequency counts, latency, and areal data for startle responses (SRs), URs, and CRs (total and adaptive). Shock artifact obscures the first 100 ms of the UR period, therefore only the last 140 ms of the UR period contain UR data.
   8. At the end of training, the software will automatically close. Remove all rats from their training boxes and return them to the vivarium.
   9. Repeat steps 5.2.5 - 5.2.6 for all subsequent training days. Before starting the Blink module on a given day, update the session number within the RAT file. This allows for creation of new RAW files for all rats that day. Each rat should have 6 RAW files, assuming that none has been removed from the training.
3. Process the RAW files and create a file that has been filtered for statistical analysis.
   1. Run the Analysis module. Review each session for each rat on a trial-by-trial basis for problematic trials. This is carried out to screen for trials that may be compromised due to various reasons (e.g., excessive pre-CS baseline activity, excessive movement, electrode detachment, cabling/wire issues). The software has algorithms that assist the experimenter with detecting and removing "bad trials" from being part of the filtered data set.
   2. Import the filtered data into a spreadsheet program and perform pertinent statistical analyses.

Le logiciel eyeblink est capable de fournir un ensemble vaste et complet de données pour de nombreux types de mesures. Par souci de concision, nous présentons dans cette étude, représentant résulte pour l’apprentissage et du rendement mesures incluant adaptative pourcentage CR, amplitude de CR adaptative, pourcentage d’UR et amplitude UR. La période CR adaptative a été choisie car il représente l’acquisition des réponses eyeblink opportune sur formation répétée, à la suite de la plasticité synaptique accrue dans l’hippocampe au cours de la trace ECC^50,51,52. Les mesures d’UR ont été choisis pour déterminer si les déficits néonatale induite par l’alcool apprentissage en trace ECC étaient dû à des perturbations dans l’apprentissage associatif ou des interruptions dans la réponse au choc nous - ce qui peut indiquer des différences de motivationnels ou moteurs, plutôt que d’apprentissage des différences entre les groupes de traitement. Pour chaque mesure ont été analysées à l’aide de 2 (sexe) x 3 (Neonatal Group) x 6 (Session) mixé ANOVA, avec Session comme le facteur de mesures répétées. Effets principaux significatifs pour le traitement néonatal ont été analysées à l’aide de tests post hoc de Tukey et interactions significatives ont été analysées à l’aide de tests simples effets. Toutes les analyses statistiques ont été effectuées à l’aide d’un niveau minimal d’alpha de 0,05 et résultats dans les graphes sont moyenne ± SEM

Commençant par la mesure de pourcentage CR adaptative, analyse de la variance indique un effet principal significatif du neonatal group, F(2,21) = 11,69, p < 0,001, mais sans effet principal du sexe (p = 0,71) ou d’une interaction significative entre ces facteurs (p = 0,20). Comme prévu, adaptative CR pourcentage a augmenté au cours des six sessions de formation, F(5, 105) = 81.15, p < 0,001 et les différences entre les groupes néonatales étaient dépendants à un certain niveau de session, F(10, 105) = 4.58, p < 0,001. Il n’y a aucune autre interaction importante mettant en cause le facteur de la session. De même pour adaptative amplitude CR, il y avait encore un effet principal significatif du neonatal group, F(2,21) = 22.32, p < 0,001, mais sans effet principal du sexe (p = 0,21) ou d’une interaction significative entre ces facteurs (p = 0,48). Amplitude de CR a aussi augmenté considérablement au cours des six sessions de formation, F(5, 105) = 59.27, p < 0,001 et les différences entre les groupes néonatales étaient dépendants à un certain niveau de session, F(10, 105) = 4.31, p < 0,001. Dans l’ensemble, ces deux mesures de CR ont montré des différences significatives entre les groupe des moyens et de ces moyens séparés significativement à différentes sessions de formation. Pour vérifier quels groupes diffèrent significativement, tests post hoc de Tukey ont montré que les rats [AI] alcool-intubé effectué sensiblement pire sur ces deux mesures CR que l’unintubated-(UC) rats témoins et sham-intubé (SI) (p < 0.01 pour pourcentage de CR ; p < 0,001 pour amplitude CR), qui ne diffère pas de l’autre (p> 0,05). Effets simples tests effectués sur le groupe néonatale importante x interactions de Session pour les deux mesures de CR, a confirmé que les rats AI portait une atteinte plus significativement dans l’acquisition de CRs commençant à 2 Session et exerçant son activité par le biais de Session 6 comparativement à des rats UC et de SI (tous p< 0,05), qui ne diffère pas de l’autre tout au long de six séances. La seule exception était adaptative amplitude CR pour rats SI n’a pas commencé à diffèrent sensiblement des rats AI jusqu'à 3 Session. Ces résultats sont présentés dans la Figure 5 a, 5 b.

Il n’y a aucune différence significative entre les mesures d’UR en raison de sexe, le groupe néonatale ou les interactions de ces facteurs avec le facteur de la session. Ces résultats négatifs ont indiqué que chaque groupe a été en mesure d’émettre des réponses eyeblink au choc nous également, et que les déficits d’apprentissage chez les rats AI n’étaient pas influencés par les différences de motivationnels ou moteurs à clignoter (Figure 6 a, 6 b).

Figure 5 : Acquisition de trace conditionné ayant répondu au questionnaire (moyenne ± SEM). Exposition à l’alcool au début (groupe IA) a considérablement affecté acquisition de pourcentage de réponse conditionnée adaptative (CR) (A) et l’amplitude (B). Trace ECC est intrinsèquement difficile à acquérir, c’est pourquoi les mesures sont relativement plus faibles pour tous les groupes - avec retard ECC, pourcentages peuvent atteindre 80 à 85 % dans les modèles de rongeurs de l’ETCAF^21,53. Néanmoins, la trace de la procédure de l’ECC est plus taxer sur l’hippocampe, qui est sensible aux effets de l’alcool pendant le développement précoce du cerveau. * = p < 0,05, ** = p < 0,01, *** = p < 0,001 entre les rats UC et l’IA ; la taille des échantillons est fournie entre parenthèses. S’il vous plaît cliquez ici pour visionner une version agrandie de cette figure.

Figure 6 : Acquisition des réponses inconditionnel (moyenne ± SEM). EyeBlink performance (pourcentage d’UR et l’amplitude de l’UR) n’était pas significativement différente entre les groupes. L’absence de différences indiquent que l’intensité du choc utilisée au cours de la formation de l’acquisition ne modifie pas différemment de motivation chez les rats AI ou leur capacité à produire défensive blink réponses au choc, comparé aux deux groupes de contrôle (UC et SI). La taille des échantillons est fournie entre parenthèses. S’il vous plaît cliquez ici pour visionner une version agrandie de cette figure.

Ratons nouveau-nés ayant reçu l’alcool éthylique pendant 4-9 jours exposé trace eyeblink conditionnement des déficiences à l’âge adulte. Ces résultats confortent l’idée que l’alcool est un agent tératogène avec immuable des effets néfastes sur la fonction de l’hippocampe. Dans l’ensemble, conditionnés répondant dans la procédure de trace était plus faible chez les rats exposés à l’alcool comparée à des rats dans les deux groupes témoins. Les troubles de l’apprentissage associatif chez les rats exposés à l’alcool n’ont pas été influencés par les différences de motivationnels ou moteurs (i.e., aucune différence en clignotant à l’intensité du choc U.S.).

Tandis que trace ECC est un outil diagnostique utile pour élucider neuropathologie hippocampe induite par le défi, les résultats de cette méthode doivent être placés dans le contexte approprié. Tout d’abord, les principaux éléments de procédures dans cette démonstration implique l’administration ciblée d’alcool pendant une fenêtre connue de vulnérabilité pour le cerveau en développement, la fabrication de matériel d’électrode qui permet l’enregistrement de l’activité électromyographique et délivre le choc, l’implantation chirurgicale du matériel susmentionné et l’expérimentation animale ultérieure à l’aide d’un paradigme d’apprentissage qui évalue une fonction cognitive d’intérêt. À chaque étape du processus, il faut ne pas causer de dommages inutiles/involontaire aux sujets rongeurs et de surveiller leurs signes de santé régulièrement. Leurs résultats comportements fournissent la « fenêtre » à la cognition, une construction psychologique qui n’est précisément décrit quand leur état de santé n’est pas compromise par les erreurs expérimentales qui englobe le dosage de l’alcool, les défauts de matériel ou implantation chirurgicale. Ainsi, chaque élément procédural dans le processus de recherche doit être implémentée de façon judicieuse afin de s’assurer que les résultats de l’ECC sont extrapolables à résultats chez l’homme. Deuxièmement, le paradigme de l’ECC donne un aperçu sur la nature de l’apprentissage associatif, mais il faut pas d’étendre les résultats à l’aide de cette approche et leur attribuer largement à d’autres domaines cognitifs - telles que la mémoire de travail, court/long terme souvenirs et conscience - à moins que l’un a incorporé certaines facettes de ces domaines au sein d’une étude de l’ECC par protocole expérimental. Par exemple, cette démonstration a examiné la phase d’acquisition de l’apprentissage ECC trace, mais n’examine pas la rétention de la mémoire chez les rats après qu’ils ont terminé la formation. La mémoire est donc un processus psychologique indépendant qui doit être évalué en plus de l’apprentissage. Par sa conception, on peut incorporer un intervalle de conservation de mémoire afin d’évaluer une capacité de mémoire à court terme ou à long terme. Troisièmement, la reconnaissance qu’il n’y a de systèmes de mémoire parallèle⁵⁴ qui peuvent fonctionner simultanément avec motivationnels, expérientiels et hormonales des facteurs qui contribuent au comportement, est essentiel pour comprendre que l’associativité (pendant ECC) est mais l’un des nombreux procédés qui révèlent ce qui est « bon » ou « mauvaise » sur l’apprentissage. Enfin, trace ECC n’est pas une tâche purement hippocampe-dépendantes, comme d’autres régions du cerveau pourraient véhiculer des composantes de la République tchèque. Ainsi, une compréhension des interactions entre les différents circuits neurones ou le type des paramètres de stimulation qui sont utilisés dans une étude, doit être tenu compte lors de répercussions sur base des résultats discrets. Le cervelet, par exemple, contribue également à tracer ECC, où elle influe sur les caractéristiques topographiques du CR et CR timing, particulièrement lorsque l’ISI est de court durée. Trace ECC n’est pas affectée chez les humains avec des dommages cérébraux qui sont testés avec un intervalle long trace (1 000 ms), mais est affectée chez les personnes qui reçoivent une plus courte trace intervalle (400 ms)³⁴. En outre, les lésions bilatérales du cortex préfrontal médial dorsale (MFPC) qui ciblent les régions antérieure agranulaires cingulaire et médiane chez la souris, prévenir l’acquisition de trace CRs⁵⁵, tandis que la destruction de la caudale MFPC chez le lapin produit similaires résultats⁴⁶. Ces résultats soulignent également l’importance d’examiner les différences entre les espèces préfrontal contributions au cerveau cervelet tige apprentissage associatif, comme trace ECC. Alors que dans cette étude et d’autres, l’exposition néonatale de l’alcool lors de l’acquisition de 4-9 nui PD de 500 ms trace CRs pour adulte rats^47,56, ce n’est pas le cas même pour les rats exposés à l’alcool néonatales que rencontrer un intervalle 300 ms de la trace, même lorsque contestée à une dose relativement élevée de l’alcool (5 g/kg)⁵⁷, ce qui suggère que la déficience de trace chez les rats exposés à l’alcool dépend de la durée de l’intervalle de la trace.

Dans cette étude, l’hippocampe a été soulignée comme étant d’une importance vitale pour la médiation de trace ECC et quand contestée par exposition à l’alcool néonatale, pièces dommages neuronaux liés, comme en témoigne les déficiences dans l’acquisition de trace CRs. Il doit toutefois, a averti que les circuits de tige de cerveau cervelet, particulièrement le nucleus interpositus, sont essentielle pour les nombreuses facettes de l’ECC, y compris l’acquisition, d’expression et des caractéristiques topographiques de la République tchèque, selon le type de tâche ECC dont trace ECC^{36,40,55,58,59}. En effet, ce circuit neuronal interagit avec l’hippocampe pour la conduite de l’expression des CRs lors de formes d’ordre supérieur d’ECC, tels que trace ECC⁶⁰. Si exposition à l’alcool pendant le développement précoce du cerveau affecte spécifiquement la fonction hippocampe dans trace ECC n’est pas entièrement clair. Plusieurs différentes régions du cerveau sont vulnérables au début insulte de l’alcool, y compris le MFPC, le cervelet et l’hippocampe^{18,19,23,47,61,62}, et il est très probable que l’alcool perturbe le fonctionnement de ces structures à des degrés divers et à varier, mais fonctionnellement importantes différences à travers de nombreuses procédures d’ECC. Malgré les obstacles concernant l’interprétation des résultats d’études ECC trace et acquisition réussie de trace CRs s’est avérée au moins compter sur un hippocampe intact, comme pris en charge par lésion animaux études^{42,44,63,64,65}. Cette procédure reste donc une approche très utile pour démontrer les liens entre l’exposition à l’alcool du développement à trace conditionné répond plus car les circuits neuronaux qui la sous-tendent, est beaucoup mieux comprise que celle des autres tâches hippocampe-dépendantes, telles que l’apprentissage de la place dans le labyrinthe de l’eau de Morris, reconnaissance des objets nouveaux et contextuelle et trace de conditionnement de la peur.

ECC comme une méthode comportementale pour « doser » cognition, a large applicabilité dans le domaine du développement neuroteratology. En effet, les découvertes récentes de notre laboratoire soutiennent l’idée que l’hippocampe en développement est très sensible aux effets de l’alcool, qui peuvent être atténuées par différentes stratégies interventionnelle^18,47. Le principal avantage ici, c’est qu’avec une meilleure compréhension des déficits d’apprentissage ECC trace induite par l’alcool, ils peuvent être prédictives d’autres problèmes dans les fonctions hippocampiques en dehors de l’apprentissage associatif - en particulier ceux connus pour être médiée par le même neuronaux hippocampe.

Application de trace ECC et ses autres variantes (p. ex., retard, inversion, discrimination, composée) pour élucider les mécanismes neurobiologiques et les systèmes neuronaux impliqués dans l’apprentissage associatif, peut être étendue au-delà du domaine de la recherche de l’alcool sur le fœtus. Par exemple, ce paradigme a reçu beaucoup d’attention dans les cas humains et des modèles animaux de troubles psychiatriques comme la schizophrénie^66,67, les maladies neurodégénératives comme la maladie d’Alzheimer^68,,⁶⁹et les drogues d’abus^70,71,72. Ses avantages comme une méthode de recherche pour évaluer le dysfonctionnement et les fonctions neurocognitives ressortent donc nombreuses disciplines psychologiques et biomédicales, y compris des neurosciences.

Les auteurs n’ont rien à divulguer.

Ce travail a été soutenu par une subvention de TDT de l’alcool boisson Medical Research Foundation (ABMRF).