Method Article
Enrichment and sequencing of protein-associated nascent DNA (eSPAN) was developed to detect the relative abundance of a chromatin-associated protein on two replicating DNA strands, thereby revealing molecular insight into chromatin replication and its coupled processes. This protocol describes eSPAN procedures in yeast and mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells.
Genome duplication is orchestrated by replisome proteins, including helicases, which unwind double-stranded DNA into individual antiparallel single strands, each requiring distinct modes of replication: continuous (leading) and discontinuous (lagging). Understanding the interactions of chromatin-associated proteins with replicating DNA strands in vivo is crucial for elucidating the mechanisms of chromatin assembly and DNA repair coupled to DNA replication. This protocol presents the enrichment and sequencing of protein-associated nascent DNA (eSPAN) method, designed to quantify relative protein levels on nascent leading and lagging DNA strands at replication forks. The eSPAN procedure starts with chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP, in yeast) or cleavage under targets and tagmentation (CUT&Tag; in mammalian cells) of a protein of interest, followed by enrichment of the protein-associated nascent DNA by bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) immunoprecipitation. Strand-specific next-generation sequencing is applied to isolated ssDNA. This technique can be used to determine whether a protein is enriched at leading or lagging replication forks. The eSPAN provides genome-wide strand-preference of chromatin-associated proteins, including histones at replication forks.
In eukaryotic organisms, genome duplication is initiated from multiple sites called replication origins, where the origin recognition complex (ORC) binds and initiates the recruitment protein machinery, including the CMG helicase, to initiate DNA replication1. The replisome machinery at each replication origin forms two replication forks that move bidirectionally2,3. The twin replication forks replicate the two parent strands of DNA through the continuous synthesis of the leading strand and discontinuous synthesis of the lagging strand. Given this asymmetric nature of each replication fork, the replication components, including the DNA polymerases on the leading and lagging strands, are different. Previous genetic analysis based on mutant DNA polymerases demonstrates that DNA Pol ε and DNA Pol δ are the major polymerases responsible for leading and lagging strand replication, respectively4,5. Several methods have been developed to detect the DNA polymerase's strand preference, including Pu-seq6,7, HydEn-seq8, and emRiboSeq or RiboSeq9,10. These genetic methods to dissect the strand specificity are limited to DNA polymerases and require introducing mutations on each protein4,5,11,12. Tracking the association of any target protein with leading and lagging strands of DNA replication forks will provide valuable insights into DNA replication. In this effort, we first developed the eSPAN technique (enrichment and sequencing of protein-associated nascent DNA, Figure 1) in yeast cells. As a proof-of-principal study, we first showed that Pol δ and Pol δ are enriched on leading and lagging strands, respectively. We also uncovered the strand preference of key DNA replication components, including the replicative DNA helicase, the single-strand DNA binding protein (replication protein A), and the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) lamp and its loader replication factor C (RFC)13. Importantly, we and others have used this method to uncover mechanisms of parental histone transfer, a process that was intractable for over 4 decades14,15,16,17.
The eSPAN method involves two sequential steps: enrichment of the target protein by ChIP18 or CUT&Tag19 and enrichment of the nascent DNA associated with the protein by BrdU immunoprecipitation. In a standard yeast strain (W303 or S288C), extracellular BrdU or EdU cannot enter cells and incorporate into chromosomes. These strains lack an appropriate nucleoside transporter for thymidine uptake as well as the thymidine kinase required to phosphorylate thymidine into TMP, which converts BrdU (or EdU) to BrdUMP (EdUMP). Expression of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1) and herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-TK) enhances thymidine uptake and the conversion of BrdU (or EdU) to BrdUMP (EdUMP)20. Therefore, to perform the eSPAN experiment in yeast, the strains had to be inserted with a BrdU-Incorporating (BrdU-Inc) structure (HSV-TK and hENT1)13,21.
Previously, we provided the eSPAN protocol for DNA replication proteins in yeast22. Recently, we integrated the CUT&Tag method into the eSPAN protocol in mammalian cells to address technically challenging steps that require optimization, such as cross-linking, chromatin shearing, and to minimize the number of starting cells17,23. Here, we provided histone eSPAN for visualization using yeast cells (Figure 2). This method is primarily used to analyze the distribution of modified forms of histones on replicating DNA strands. While we tested several histone marks, we used H3K4me3, a mark on the parental histone H3, as an example. To analyze replisome components and factors involved in DNA repair at replication forks, we recommend shearing chromatin into small fragments using sonication as described in our first publication22. For mammalian cells, we adopted the modified Cut&Tag procedures to replace the ChIP step described in yeast23. This modification reduces the amount of starting material (cells) and, most importantly, enables the generation of eSPAN libraries for sequencing without the use of single-stranded DNA preparation kits. For the yeast protocol, we opted not to use the Cut&Tag method because the amount of starting material was sufficient. More importantly, we found that the Cut&Tag procedures were not consistently effective for yeast cells in our hands.
NOTE: For buffer and reagent preparation guidelines, see buffer and reagent preparation guidelines (Supplementary File 1).
1. Histone eSPAN in budding yeast
NOTE: Most yeast strains lack a functional nucleoside transporter for thymidine uptake. To efficiently label DNA with BrdU or EdU for eSPAN, a thymidine kinase-positive (TK+) strain21 is required. Additionally, only mating type 'A' yeast strains can be used for cell cycle arrest using alpha factor.
2. Histone eSPAN with mouse ES cell
NOTE: The histone eSPAN with mouse ES cell is essentially identical to a previously published protocol23.
3. eSPAN Data analysis for yeast cells (1 day)
NOTE: This data analysis process applies only to the yeast data; the eSPAN data analysis for ES cells can be followed as outlined in a recent publication23.
eSPAN can be utilized to acquire strand-specific information regarding a target protein, such as histones and histone modifications. In this representative result, sample collection and eSPAN processes were conducted following the schematic outlined in Figure 2 using the budding yeast system. The sample treatment and collection follow the hydroxyurea treated early S phase condition as this protocol. Two yeast strains, WT (wild-type) and mcm2-3A mutant, were employed. The DNA helicase subunit MCM2 acts as a parental histone H3-H4 chaperone, while the mcm2-3A mutant (containing 3 amino acid mutations) lacks the capability to bind parental histone H3-H414,27. Figure 3A displays DNA fragments with multiples of a constant length, revealing a chromatin nucleosome ladder pattern analyzed using a bioanalyzer for prepared sequencing libraries. Typically, eSPAN libraries yield concentrations ranging from 2 nM to 20 nM following this protocol. In the standard eSPAN process, we have also prepared single-stranded DNA libraries with input and BrdU-IP, which can be used as control or bias normalization for ChIP and eSPAN libraries, respectively. Figure 3B illustrates the input, BrdU-IP, and eSPAN mapping. Figure 3C presents the average strand bias of parental histone (represented by H3K4me3) eSPAN of all early replication origins of WT and mcm2-3A. These results demonstrate that in WT yeast cells, parental histone (H3K4me3) deposition exhibits a slight bias toward the lagging strand. In the mcm2-3A mutant, parental histone H3-H4 is transferred to the leading strand due to a defect in the transfer of parental histone to lagging strand14,15.
Figure 1: An outline of the experimental strategy for the eSPAN method, exemplified with a lagging strand polymerase (Pol δ). During cell culture, the newly synthesized DNA is labeled with BrdU. The replicating chromatin is fragmented by physical sonication or enzyme-based fragmentation method. The Pol δ ChIP process is performed. Following DNA extraction after the protein ChIP, the DNA is denatured firstly and newly synthesized DNA is isolated with a BrdU IP step. The recovered ssDNA is constructed into an ssDNA library, preserving the strand information. Following the sequencing, the reads are mapped to the Watson and Crick strands of the yeast genome to identify the target protein location and strand-specific information. Therefore, eSPAN detects the association of a protein with nascent DNA at DNA replication forks. Here, the red line represents the new Watson strand, the green line represents the new Crick strand, and the black line represents the parental DNA. This figure has been modified with permission from Jia et al.28. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Workflow of eSPAN and related experimental processes in yeast (left) and mouse ES cells (right). This figure compares the eSPAN protocol in mammalian (right side) and yeast systems (left side). Yeast cells are synchronized, crosslinked, labeled with BrdU, and digested by MNase. In the following, the digested chromatin is used to perform immunoprecipitation with specific antibodies against histones or proteins. To obtain the nascent DNA, the purified dsDNA from immunoprecipitation is then denatured and immunoprecipitated with an anti-BrdU antibody. The mapped reads are aligned to Watson or Crick strands following the ssDNA library construction and next-generation sequencing. The bias is computed using the formula Log2 (W/C) or (W - C)/(W + C). BrdU labeled Mammalian cells are permeabilized for CUT&Tag. The primary antibody, secondary antibody, and protein A-fused transposase pA-Tn5 sequentially bind to the target protein. After magnesium was added, pA-Tn5 locally digests and labels the genomic DNA bound to targeted histones. The next step is oligo replacement, which maintains the specificity and direction of the strand. After carrying out BrdU IP in a manner similar to the yeast method, the resultant ssDNA is immediately amplified by PCR and purified for sequencing. The input and BrdU-IP-ssSeq are used for BrdU-IP and eSPAN normalization, respectively. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Representative result of eSPAN libraries and sequencing data. Results for eSPAN in mammalian cells can be found in previous publication23. (A) A typical gel analysis of DNA sequencing library of H3K4me3 eSPAN by Agilent fragment analyzer. The main band (mononuclesome band) is ~270 bp because the adapters (total ~120 nt) are adding to the mononuclesome DNA fragment (150 bp) obtained from digestion. (B) A snapshot of input, H3K4me3 ChIP-seq, BrdU-IP-Seq, and H3K4me3 eSPAN peaks at individual nucleosomes surrounding origin ARS607 (autonomously replicating sequence 607) in WT and mcm2-3A cells. (C) The average bias ratio of H3K4me3 eSPAN peaks at each of the 20 individual nucleosomes of the 134 early replication origins in WT and mcm2-3A cells. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Components | Volume/sample |
5× TB buffer | 40 µL |
Genomic DNA in ddH2O | 200-500 ng |
pA-Tn5-ME-A adaptor complex | 2 µL |
ddH2O | Up to 200 µL |
Total volume | 200 µL |
Table 1: In vitro tagmentation reaction setup.
Detection of proteins associated with leading and lagging replication strands is important for understanding the mechanisms of chromatin replication and the associated process, which are directly relevant to human cancer research and the mechanisms of drug resistance. Several methods, such as 2D gel, native Chromatin immunoprecipitation(nChIP), iPOND, and nascent chromatin capture29,30,31, have been employed to study DNA replication and related processes such as DNA repair. In addition, methods for in vivo mapping of nascent chromatin, such as MINCE-Seq (Mapping In vivo Nascent Chromatin with EdU and sequencing)32 and CHOR-seq (Chromatin Occupancy after Replication)33, have been developed to study the dynamics of histones and other chromatin-binding proteins during the DNA replication process. Although these methods have significantly advanced our understanding of chromatin replication, none of them can detect proteins on different strands of replication forks. The eSPAN method provides high-resolution, genome-wide, and strand-specific profiles of target proteins at replication forks.
Since eSPAN is essentially a sequential immunoprecipitation (target protein ChIP and BrdU-IP), the final DNA yield is very low (less than 1 ng), which requires careful consideration to avoid nonspecific binding and other potential contaminations. First, the use of low-DNA binding centrifuge tubes is essential to ensure consistent results34, as we have experienced several BrdU IP failures due to high nonspecific binding tubes. Second, it is recommended to work in a PCR workstation during the ssDNA library preparation process to minimize contamination. Third, check the pear-shaped morphology of G1 arrest cells using microscopy or FACS to ensure that the majority of cells used for eSPAN should be in the S phase. While eSPAN can use asynchronous cell populations, synchronization helps to enrich replicating cells and efficient BrdU incorporation. Lastly, eSPAN relies on primary antibodies to bind to their chromatin targets. To generate high-quality sequencing data, targets with minimal chromatin enrichment or antibodies with poor performance may require intensive optimization or deeper sequencing. Likewise, the specificity of BrdU antibodies is crucial for a successful eSPAN experiment. Strand discrimination relies solely on the ratio of W/C read counts. As long as the method -- whether it involves an ssDNA library kit in yeast cells or a cut-and-tag-based approach in mammalian cell -- preserves DNA strand information, it has no impact on the bias calculation.
eSPAN has its limitations in various applications. Since ChIP is part of eSPAN, the target must be suitable for ChIP. Therefore, proteins that indirectly or transiently bind DNA, such as chromatin remodelers, are difficult to study with eSPAN. Similarly, the application of eSPAN to study chromatin-bound factors with fast dynamics is limited. Both ChIP and eSPAN are population-based methods and do not provide single-cell information, so their application to cell populations with high heterogeneity requires caution. Additionally, eSPAN requires nascent DNA synthesis for BrdU/EdU incorporation; therefore, cell synchronization is recommended prior to DNA labeling.
To date, the eSPAN method has been used to study the strand preference of DNA replisome components, histones with distinct modifications23,35. Its application unveils new or previously unexpected mechanisms of chromatin replication. We expect to use the eSPAN method in the future to understand human disease mechanisms or clinical drug targeting. For example, although PARP inhibitors are used clinically in various types of cancer, their mechanisms are still under debate36. One model suggests that the PARP inhibitors can trap PARP on the DNA replication lagging strand37. We expect that the eSPAN method could potentially answer this question and other questions that benefit human health.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R35GM118015 (Z.Z.), R01GM130588 (C.Y.), and the Hormel Startup Fund (C.Y.).
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
0.5 M EDTA, pH 8.0 | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 15575020 | |
1.5 mL DNA low-binding tubes | Eppendorf | 22431021 | |
10x Ampligase buffer | Lucigen | A1905B | |
10x PBS | Corning | 21-040-CV | |
10x TBS | BioRad | 1706435 | |
16 G x 1-1/2 in. BD PrecisionGlid Needle | BD Biosciences | 305198 | |
ACCEL-NGS 1S PLUS DNA LIBRARY KIT | Integrated DNA Technologies | 10009817 | ssDNA and low-input DNA library prep kit |
Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer | Agilent | 2100 bioanalyze | |
Agilent DNA 1000 kit | Agilent | 5607-1504 | |
Ampligase | Lucigen | A0110K | Handle paraformaldehyde with care, it is flammable solid hazardous. |
AMPure XP | Beckman | A63881 | |
AMPure XP SPRI Reagent | Beckman Coulter | A63882 | |
Anti-BrdU antibody | BD Biosciences | 555627 | |
Anti-H3K4me3 antibody | abcam | ab8580 | |
Automated cell counter , model TC10 | BioRad | 145-0001 | |
Bacitracin | Sigma | 11702 | |
Bacto peptone | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 211830 | |
Benzamidine Hydrochloride | Sigma | B2417 | Combustible Solids |
BrdU | Sigma | B5002 | Handle BrdU with care as it is a potential mutagen and teratogen. |
BSA | New England Biolabs | B9000S | |
CaCl2 | Sigma | C4901 | |
Cell culture incubator | Thermo Fisher Scientific model Forma series II water-jacketed CO2 incubator | 3140 | |
Cell culture medium | |||
Cell line ES-E14 | |||
Chelex-100 | BioRad | 1422842 | 200–400 dry mesh size |
Chloroform | Sigma | 366919 | |
Concanavalin A (ConA)-coated magnetic beads | Polysciences | 86057-10 | |
Digitonin | Millipore | 300410-5MG | |
DMSO | Sigma | D8418 | |
E. coli tRNA | Sigma | 10109541001 | |
Ethanol | Thermo Fisher Scientific | BP2818100 | Handle ethanol with care, it is flammable |
glucose | Sigma | G7021 | |
Glycerol | Sigma | G5516 | |
HCl | Sigma | H1758 | |
HEPES | Sigma | H3375 | |
Isopropanol | Thermo Fisher Scientific | BP26324 | Handle isoproponol with care, it is flammable |
KAPA HiFi HotStart Ready Mix | Roche | 7958889001 | |
KCl | Sigma | P9541 | |
KOH | sigma | 221473 | Handle KOH with care, it is corrosive |
Low-speed vacuum | |||
Magnet stand | Millipore | LSKMAGS08 | |
Mastercycler Gradient PCR Thermal Cycler | Eppendorf | 5331 | |
MgCl2 | Sigma | M8266 | |
Micrococcal nuclease (MNase) | Worthington | LS004798 | |
MinElute PCR purification kit | Qiagen | 28006 | |
Mini-beads beater | Mini BeadBeater 24 Disruptor | 607 | |
Mini-centrifuge | Eppendorf | 5424R | |
MnCl2 | Sigma | 244589 | |
Multiplatform shaker | Fisherbrand | 02-217-765 | |
Multiplatform shaker incubator | Benchmark | INCU-SHAKER 10L | |
Multithermal heat block | Eppendorf | Thermomixer C | |
N-[Tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl]-3-aminopropanesulfonic acid (TAPS) | Sigma | T5130 | 200–400 dry mesh size |
NaCl | Sigma | S9888 | |
NaOH | Sigma | S8045 | Handle NaOH with care, it is corrosive |
NEBNext HiFi 2× PCR master mix | New England Biolabs | M0541 | |
NP-40 Igepal CA-630 | Thermo Scientific | J61055.AP | |
Paraformaldhyde | sigma | 158127 | Handle paraformaldehyde with care, it is flammable solid hazardous. |
pA-Tn5 enzyme | Addgene | 121137 | |
Pefabloc | Sigma | 11429868001 | |
Phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol | Invitrogen | 15593049 | |
Pipette P1000, P200, P20 and P2 | Eppendorf | 2231300004 | |
PMSF | Sigma | 10837091001 | |
Protease inhibitor cocktail tablet | Sigma | S8830 | |
Protease inhibitor cocktail tablet | Sigma | S8830 | |
Protein G-sepharose beads | GE Healthcare | 17-0618-02 | |
Protein precipitation solution | Qiagen | 848023 | |
Protein precipitation solution | Qiagen | 848023 | Handle KOH with care, it is corrosive |
Protein precipitation solution | Qiagen | 848023 | |
Proteinase K | Sigma | 311584401 | |
QIAquick PCR purification kit | Qiagen | 28106 | |
RNase A | Sigma | 10109169001 | |
SDS | Sigma | L3771 | |
Spectrophotometer | Thermo Scientific. | 2000/2000c | |
Spermidine | Sigma | S2626 | |
T4 DNA Pol | New England Biolabs, | M0203 | |
Table top centrifuge | Beckman Coulter | Allegra X-5 | |
Tris | Sigma | 11814273001 | |
Triton X-100 | Sigma | T8787 | |
yeast extract | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 212730 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved