Method Article
* These authors contributed equally
This protocol describes the generation of fast and reproducible endodermal hepatic organoids (eHEPOs). With this protocol, eHEPOs can be produced within 2 weeks and expand long-term (more than 1 year) without losing their differentiation and functionality.
Organoid technology has allowed us to generate a variety of human organ-like mini structures, such as for the liver, brain, and intestine, in vitro. The remarkable advances in organoid models have recently opened a new experimental era for various applications in disease modeling, developmental biology, and drug discovery. Adult stem cells or induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived liver organoids govern the generation of hepatocytes to use for diverse applications. Here, we present a robust and reproducible protocol for generating hepatic organoids from pluripotent stem cells. This protocol is applicable to healthy and patient-derived cells. To achieve 3D endoderm-derived hepatic organoids (eHEPOs), iPSCs were directly first differentiated into endodermal cells, and then FACS-enriched EpCAM-positive (EpCAM+) cells were used to establish hepatic organoids using the expansion medium. We provide a fast and efficient method to generate hepatic organoids within 2 weeks. The generated organoids mimic the essential properties and functions of hepatocytes, such as albumin secretion, glycogen storage, and cytochrome P450 enzyme activity. Besides the liver-specific gene expression similarities, eHEPOs comprise polarized epithelial cells with bile canaliculi in between. In addition, eHEPOs can be expanded and serial passages long term (1 year) without losing their capacity to differentiate into mature hepatocytes. Thus, eHEPOs provide an alternative source to produce functional hepatocytes.
Organoids are miniaturized organ-like structures grown in 3-dimensional culture conditions that mimic the organ microenvironment and include the intrinsic factors necessary for self-organization and self-renewal in organ development itself. Organoids can be derived either from pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) or adult tissue-derived cells (stem or progenitor cells)1. Although their accurate organ-like organization and functional similarity to the specific organ make them valuable tools for disease modeling, they still need further improvements in terms of standardization in culture. In particular, several protocols have been published for the generation of liver organoids, and they differ in their complexity and reproducibility2. For instance, the liver bud organoids developed by Takebe et al. take the form of dense, multi-cellular structures containing the following induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs): hepatic endodermal progenitors, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). However, those organoids do not have long-term self-renewal capacity3,4.
From a historical perspective, Huch et al. first reported the production of human hepatic epithelial organoids derived from adult tissue, in which the cells polarize and specialize to reproduce aspects of the native epithelium5. Then, Guan et al. used iPSC-derived hepatic organoids to model Alagille syndrome (ALGS), a rare genetic disorder associated with bile duct reduction within the liver6. Both of these organoids have self-renewal capacity and can gain mature hepatocyte functions, such as bile and albumin secretion, glycogen storage, and liver-specific drug detoxification. In a recent study, Ramli et al. introduced a PSC-derived liver organoid model containing functional bile canaliculi networks between polarized hepatocyte-like cells (HLCs) that empty cholestatic drugs into biliary cysts composed of cholangiocyte-like cells (CLCs)7.
This study presents a unique culture for generating iPSC-derived endodermal hepatic organoids, called eHEPOs. The iPSC culture and differentiation into endoderm are described step by step, and the generation of eHEPOs from enriched EpCAM+ progenitors is demonstrated. Finally, the characterization of the functionality and structural organization of the eHEPOs, as well as the cryopreservation of the organoids, are described.
Permissions related to experimental steps were obtained from the local Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Dokuz Eylul University Medical Faculty (2013/25-4, May 12, 2013; 2016/30-29, November 24, 2016).
1. Preparing solutions for cell culture
2. Thawing the iPSCs on the feeder-free plate
3. Endoderm differentiation
4. eHEPO establishment
5. Characterization of eHEPOs
6. Cryopreservation of the eHEPOs
7. Thawing of the eHEPOs
Firstly, human fibroblast cells or peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) cells were cultured and converted to iPSCs via episomal reprogramming. The fresh knockout serum was essential for obtaining healthy iPSCs. Then, the iPSCs were seeded into the BMM-coated culture plates with 50%-60% confluency. Having iPSC colonies of a small/medium size improved the differentiation efficiency. Then, the iPSCs were differentiated into definitive endoderm with medium containing Activin A, Wnt3a, and R-spo1 factors for 5 days. During the differentiation, the number and size of the cells increased significantly; therefore, paying attention to refreshing the medium is necessary. At the end of the endoderm differentiation, the EpCAM+ cells were enriched by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) method, and the sorted cells were embedded into BMM and grown for 10-14 days in the expansion medium (EM). The organoid formation capacity depends on the fresh medium components and the pure cell population; therefore, successful cell sorting is a critical step. When the size of the eHEPOs was larger than 100 µm and they had 70%-80% confluency, the cells were dissociated. eHEpOs have the capacity for long-term culture (1 year), and generated eHEPOs can be cryopreserved. Four organoid droplets with 70%-80% confluency are ideal for cryopreservation. The organoid splitting step before starting the maturation/differentiation is very critical. The viability of large organoids decreases during differentiation. In this work, the generated organoids were dissociated mechanically, re-embedded into BMM (1:4 ratio), and differentiated toward mature hepatocytes for 10-14 days in the differentiation medium (DM) (Figure 1).
An immunostaining analysis was performed to validate whether the organoids originating from EpCAM+ cells committed toward the hepatic lineage. The presence of CK19+ and HNF4ɑ+ cells indicates that hepatoblast and/or bile duct progenitor cells are in the organoids. Additionally, organoids expressing epithelial tissue markers such as E-CAD+ cells and cubical/polyhedral epithelial cells expressing ZO-1 indicate the presence of tight junctions between the cells. We observed organoids expressing ALB+, A1AT+, and CK18+, indicating the existence of mature hepatocytes4,5,6,7 (Figure 2).
Histological analysis with hematoxylin-eosin staining showed that the organoids maintained a well-organized epithelial structure. E-CAD⁺ cells displayed a characteristic polygonal, epithelioid morphology resembling hepatocyte-like cells. The detection of CK19⁺ cells indicated the presence of hepatoblasts or cholangiocyte-like populations. In addition, ALB⁺ and A1AT⁺ cells confirmed the presence of more mature hepatocyte-like cells within the organoids5,6 (Figure 3).
In the ultrastructure analysis, it was observed that intercellular tight junction complexes developed in the eHEPOs, and apical surface differentiations were observed. It was observed that bile canaliculi-like structures were formed between the intercellular junctional complexes. Bile canaliculi (BCs) were observed between the cell junctional complexes (Figure 4). Mitochondria (Mt), vacuolar inclusions (V), and collagen (Col) were abundant within the hepatocytes (Figure 4).
The qPCR results showed that the expression level of mature hepatocyte markers (ALB, A1AT, CYP3A4, and CYPA7)10 increased following differentiation, whereas the expression level of endoderm marker (EpCAM) and AFP decreased following differentiation. The RPL41 gene was used as a housekeeping gene. In this protocol, there is no need to remove the BMM during the sample collection for PCR experiments. Instead, the lysis buffer can be directly poured onto the eHEPOs. The macroscopic structure of the organoids was examined with H&E staining (Figure 5B, upper panel), which indicated structure-like-hepatocyte cords (remark) and a structure-like bile canaliculus. Glycogen storage analysis was done with a PAS stain. In Figure 5, the pink-stained areas represent glycogen storage in the cell cytoplasm (Figure 5B, lower panel). Moreover, the results showed that the eHEPOs gained mature hepatocyte functions, such as CYP enzyme activity and albumin secretion to the culture medium upon differentiation.
Figure 1: Schematic representation of endoderm-derived hepatic organoids (eHEPOs). This figure defines the timeline and critical steps during the organoid culture generation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Verification of the eHEPOs via immunofluorescence staining. Confocal images of whole-mount immunostaining of organoids for (A) CK19/DAPI, (C) DAPI/CK18, and (B) DAPI/ZO-1/ALB. (D,E,F) DAPI/E-CAD/A1AT, DAPI/HNF4ɑ/E-CAD, and DAPI/E-CAD were stained from frozen sections. DAPI was used to co-stain the nuclei. (A,C) The blue color in the nucleus marks the DAPI staining, the green color in the cytoskeleton marks the CK19 and CK18 staining, (B,D) the green color in the membrane shows ZO1 and E-CAD, and the green color in the nucleus shows HNF4ɑ staining. Scale bars: (A) upper panel: 50 µm, lower panel: 10 µm; (B) upper panel: 50 µm, lower panel: 20 µm; (C) upper panel: 50 µm, lower panel: 10 µm; (D) upper panel: 20 µm, lower panel: 20 µm; (E) 20 µm; (F) 50 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Characterization of the eHEPOs via immunohistochemical staining. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of organoids, immunohistochemical staining of organoids for (B), (C) E-CAD, (D) ALB, (E) A1AT, and (F) CK19. Scale bars: (A) 200 µm; (B) 100 µm; (C,D,F) 50 µm; (E) 200 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Ultrastructural analysis of eHEPOs with electron microscopy. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of eHEPOs. (A-C) The white circles indicate intercellular junctional complexes, the black arrows show apical surface differentiation (microvilli), and (B) the red arrow shows a transverse section of microvilli. Key: Mt = mitochondria; V = vacuolar inclusions; Col = collagen; BC = Bile canaliculi; black arrow = microvilli; red arrow = transverse section of microvilli; red asterisks = apoptotic cell debris. Scale bars: (A) 2 µm; (B) 1 µm; (C) 200 nm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Functional analysis of the eHEPOs. (A) qPCR analysis of the eHEPOs. The data represent the average of at least three independent experiments. Student's t-tests were used for statistic analysis; (B) hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and periodic acid-Shiff (PAS) staining of the eHEPOs in paraffin sections (black circles: like hepatocyte cords; black arrow: like bile canaliculus; red asterisks: glycogen storage area PAS [+]). Scale bars: top panels, 200 µm; bottom panels, 50 µm. (C) CYP3A4 enzyme activity in eHEPOs as shown in RLU/mL/million cells. (D) Albumin secretion levels as measured with ELISA. The data are expressed as ngALB/day/million cells. (E) Albumin secretion of organoids from different passage numbers (p10, p20, p30) cultured in DM conditions, as measured by ELISA. (F) Percentage of ammonia elimination capacity of EM and DM organoids. (G) Visualization of bile transport, which was analyzed with the cholyglylamido-fluorescein assay in control and CLF-treated organoids. Scale bar: 200 µm. The error bars show the standard deviation (SD), and significant differences between groups were considered at p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001, and *** p < 0.0001. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Gene | Forward Primer 5` --> 3` | Reverse Primer 3` --> 5` | Amplicon Length (bp) |
EpCAM | CTGGCCGTA AACTGCTTT GT | AGCCCATCA TTGTTCTGG AG | 182 |
CYP3A7 | AACACAGATCCC CCTGAAATTACG | AGGTCTCTGG TGTTCTGGGG | 164 |
A1AT | CCACCGCCATCTT CTTCCTGCCTGA | GAGCTTCAGGGG TGCCTCCTCTGTG | 245 |
AFP | AGGGAGCGGC TGACATTATT | GGCCAACACC AGGGTTTACT | 75 |
ALB | TTGGCACAATG AAGTGGGTA | AAAGGCAATC AACACCAAGG | 161 |
CYP3A4 | TGTGCCTGAG AACACCAGAG | GTGGTGGAAA TAGTCCCGTG | 226 |
RPL41 | TCGGCACTT ACCAGCAT | CATTCGC TTCTTCC | 100 |
Table 1: PCR primer sequences list.
The present protocol describes a comprehensive method for generating, expanding, and freezing/thawing hepatic organoids starting from iPSCs. This protocol covers all the steps, including culturing the iPSCs on the feeder and feeder-free culture, 2-dimensional endoderm differentiation, enrichment of the progenitor cells with FACS and organoid formation, and generating function-gaining organoids. Moreover, detailed instructions for validating and characterizing the organoids are also provided. The major obstacle to the wide application of mature and functional hepatocytes is the limited sources of primary hepatocytes, the inability to expand the hepatocytes long-term, and the cryopreservation of the cells15,16. Combining iPSCs and organoid technology provides a powerful tool to generate unlimited functional hepatocytes.
In the first 5 days of the protocol, iPSCs were differentiated into endoderm cells using Activin A, Wnt3A, and R-spo1. R-spo1 acts as a Wnt pathway agonist protein and induces increased numbers of EpCAM+ cells10. Obtaining EpCAM+ cells of more than 60%-70% confluency indicates proper endoderm differentiation. To this aim, the size and cell confluency of the iPSCs affect the differentiation efficiency. The centers of large organoids are not differentiated very well, and starting with a high iPSC confluency of more than 60% negatively affects the cell viability. During cell differentiation, all published protocols utilize a defined method to direct the cell fates; however, the differentiation efficiency is not very high, and at the end of the path, heterogeneous cell populations emerge17. To reduce the heterogeneity within the organoid-initiating cell population, in this protocol, the EpCAM+ endodermal progenitor cells are enriched. It was found that only EpCAM+, rather than EPCAM−, cells had the potency to form 3D organoids. In addition, this method allows one to expand and passage organoids for more than 1 year in the culture. During long-term cell culture, the organoids preserve their functional properties. The eHEPO viability depends on the fresh medium components (especially R-spo1 and FGF10) and the cell splitting ratio (ideally 1:4 or 1:6). Additionally, in this work, the gene expression of mature hepatocyte markers was stronger in the DM condition in comparison with EM medium. After day 5 of differentiation, the cells started to express albumin; therefore, the eHEPOs can be used at an earlier step.
Histological and ultrastructural analyses have shown that organoids (eHEPOs) develop like mature liver tissue during embryogenesis. The formation of intercellular connections between the hepatocyte cells, the appearance of apical surface differentiation in the lumen (microvilli), and the development of bile canaliculi structures have been observed, similar to in the liver organogenesis process18. In terms of immunostaining in this protocol, staining was performed with two different techniques. To determine the eHEPO cell content, whole-mount staining was performed. In this staining protocol, the incubation times are longer than in the section staining. Indeed, longer incubation times with 3-dimensional structures allow one to improve the staining efficiency. For a more specific protein expression analysis, the staining should be done on cryosections or paraffin sections. Ultrastructural analysis is a more specific method for understanding the structure of organoids. In this method, the size of the organoids affects the incubation time. The incubation times can be shortened if the organoids are smaller than 200 µm. If the time is kept longer (especially acetone series or propylene oxide steps), the structure becomes more fragile and unstable. A long incubation time usually affects the size of the organoids and causes them to shrink. However, all the steps in this protocol are critical, and we want to emphasize the steps for the generation and sorting of the EpCAM+ cells.
Starting with pure population directly affects the organoid formation capacity. In addition, culturing the eHEPOs in the proper conditions, such as ensuring the appropriate cell confluency and performing the subculturing at the correct time, affects the long-term stability of the eHEPOs. eHEPOs are superior over other hepatic organoid models derived from iPSCs for the following reasons19,20: (1) the organoids form in just 14 days, and during differentiation, there is no need for passaging the organoids, contrary to published protocols6,19; (2) the organoids can be increased in culture in a proper way for over 1 year (Passage 48), whereas this culturing time for other protocols is 2 months. Like other iPSCs-derived hepatic organoid models, one of the disadvantages of this protocol relates to the expression of early liver development markers such as AFP. To improve the organoid formation and differentiation capacity, we are trying to discover the cell composition of eHEPOs using single-cell RNA sequencing resolution. Moreover, adding liver microenvironment clues to the culture medium will be beneficial for generating more mature eHEPOs.
In order to use eHEPOs for cellular therapies applications, one needs to replace the BMM with a human-compatible matrix. In this regard, tissue engineering approaches and scaffolds that bio-mimic the liver's scaffold could be utilized. Taking together, eHEPOs will be rather convenient in terms of personalized drug screening, preclinical hepatotoxicity analyses, and disease modeling.
The authors have nothing to disclose. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Esra Erdal is co-founder of the ORGANO-ID Biotechnology company.
This research was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) via projects SBAG-115S465 and SBAG-213S182. Figure 1 was generated using BioRender.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
15 mL conical centrifuge tubes | Corning | 430052 | |
37 °C water bath | Nüve | 210.NB9 | |
37 °C, 5 % CO2 incubator | Memmert | INCO 153 | |
50 mL conical centrifuge tubes | Corning | 430290 | |
70 µm and 40 µm Cell strainer | Falcon | 352350/ 352340 | |
70% Ethanol | Sigma | 1009832511 | |
A1AT | Abcam | ab166610 | Dilution: 1/500 (IF), 1/50 (IHC) |
A-83.01 (TGF-β inhibitor) | Tocris Biosciene | 2939 | |
Acetone | Isolab | 9,01,026 | |
Adhesive Microscope Slide | Histobond | C981040 | |
Advanced DMEM-F12 | Gibco | 12634-010 | |
AFP | Abcam | ab3980 | Dilution: 1/25 (IHC) |
Agar | EMS | 10200 | |
ALB | Abcam | ab10241 | Dilution: 1/100 (IF), 1/20 (IHC) |
Alexa Flour 488 (Mouse) | Invitrogen | A11001 | Dilution: 1/1000 (IF) |
Alexa Flour 488 (Rabbit) | Invitrogen | A110034 | Dilution: 1/1000 (IF) |
Alexa Flour 594 (Mouse) | Invitrogen | A11005 | Dilution: 1/1000 (IF) |
Alexa flour 594 (Rabbit) | Invitrogen | A11037 | Dilution: 1/1000 (IF) |
Ammonia Assay Kit | Sigma-Aldrich | MAK-310 | |
Ammonium cloride | Santa Cruz | sc-202936 | |
B27 Supplement 50x | Gibco | 12587010 | |
Base mold | Sakura | 4216 | |
b-FGF | Peprotech | 100-18B | |
Biosafety, CLASS II,SAFETY CABINET | Thermo | SAFE 2020 | |
Calibrated pipettes | Gilson | F167380 | |
Centrifuge | Eppendorf | 5702 | |
Cholylglycylamido-fluorescein | Corning | 451041 | |
Citrate Buffer pH 6.0 | Bio-optica | 15-M103 | |
CK-18 | Santa Cruz | sc-51582 | Dilution: 1/100 (IF), 1/20 (IHC) |
CK-19 | Santa Cruz | sc-6278 | Dilution: 1/100 (IF), 1/20 (IHC) |
Confocal Microscope | Zeiss | LSM880 | |
Cryogenic handling gloves and eye protection | Cryokit | 5274 | |
Cryostat | Leica | CM 1950 | |
Cryovial tubes | Corning | 430659 | |
DAB | Roche | 11718096001 | |
DAPT | Sigma-Aldrich | a5942 | |
Dexamethasone | Sigma-Aldrich | D4902 | |
Dispase | Stem Cell Technologies | 7923 | |
DMEM F12 | Gibco | 31330038 | |
E-CAD | Santa Cruz | sc-8426 | Dilution: 1/100 (IF), 1/20 (IHC) |
EDTA | Invitrogen | 15575-020 | |
Electron Microscope | Zeiss | Sigma500 | |
ELISA kit | Fortis life sciences bethyl | E88-129 | |
Embed 812 Embedding Kit | EMS | 14121 | |
Entellan | Merck | 107961 | |
Eosin Y %1 | Sigma-Aldrich | HT110332 | |
EpCAM | Miltenyi Biotec | 130-059-901 | Dilution: 1/11 (FACS) |
Ethanol | Merck | 1,00,98,32,511 | |
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) | Gibco | 26010066 | |
Forskolin (FSK) | Tocris Biosciene | 1099 | |
Freezing container (Mr. Frosty) | Thermo | 5100-0001 | |
Freezing Medium | Gibco | 12648010 | |
Glass Pasteur pipette | Isolab | 084.01.001 | |
Glutamax 100x | Gibco | 35050-068 | |
Gluteraldehyde %25, EM grade | EMS | 16210-1L | |
Goat Anti-Mouse HRP | Thermo Fisher | 62-6520 | Dilution: 1/1000 (IHC) |
Goat Anti-Rabbit HRP | Thermo Fisher | 31460 | Dilution: 1/1000 (IHC) |
Goat Serum | Gibco | 162-10-072 | |
H2O2 | Merck | 107209 | |
Hematoxylin | Millipore | HX86017674 | |
HEPES, 1 M | Gibco | 15630-056 | |
HNF-4α | Abcam | ab55223 | Dilution: 1/50 (IHC) |
Ice and dry ice | homemade | homemade | |
Incubator (65 °C) | Nüve | EN 400 | |
Isopropanol | Sigma-Aldrich | 24137 | |
Leu15 Gastrin I human | Sigma-Aldrich | G9145 | |
Luminometer | Berthold Tech | LB 960 | |
Master mix | Applied Biosystems | 43676659 | |
Matrigel matrix, hESC-Qualified | Corning | 354277 | |
Matrigel matrix, phenol-red-free | Corning | 356231 | |
Methanol | Merck | 179337 | |
Microcentrifuge tubes | Axygen | 321-02-501 | |
Microscope | Zeiss | AXIO VERT A1 | |
Microtome blade | Feather | S35, C35 | |
mTeSR1 | Stem Cell Technologies | sc-05850 | |
Multi well suspension culture plates | Sarstedt | 83,39,21,500 | |
N2 supplement 100x | Gibco | 17502048 | |
N-Acetylcysteine | Sigma-Aldrich | A9165 | |
Neutral Buffered Formalin %10 | Tekkim | TK.60161.05001 | |
Nicotinamide | Sigma-Aldrich | N0636 | |
Non-essential Amino Acide (NEAA) | Gibco | 11140050 | |
OCT | Tissue-Tek | 4583 | |
Osmium tetroxide | EMS | 19110 | |
P450-Glo Assays kit | Promega | V9001 | |
Pap-pen | Sigma | Z377821-1EA | |
Paraffin | Tekkim | TK.200661.01002 | |
PAS stain kit | Abcam | ab150680 | |
PBS | Lonza | be17-516 | |
Penicillin/Streptomycin | Gibco | 15630-056 | |
Phosphotungustic acid | Ted Pella | 19402 | |
Pipette aid | Axygen | Motopet-1 | |
Plate reader varioskan flash | Thermo | 5250040 | |
Prolong Antifade Mountant | Invitrogen | P36980 | |
Propylene Oxide, EM grade | EMS | 20401 | |
Real Time PCR system | Applied Biosystems | 7500 Fast | |
Recombinant human Activin A | R&D | 338-Ac-050 | |
Recombinant human BMP7 | Peprotech | 120-03 | |
Recombinant human EGF | Peprotech | af-100-15 | |
Recombinant human FGF10 | Peprotech | 100-26 | |
Recombinant human FGF19 | Peprotech | 100-32 | |
Recombinant human HGF | Peprotech | 100-39 | |
Rho kinase inhibitor, Y-27632 dihydrochloride | Sigma-Aldrich | Y0503 | |
RNase/DNase free 1.5 mL tube | Axygen | 31108101 | |
RNase/DNase free filter tips | Sarstedt | 703031255 | |
Rotary Microtome | Leica | RM 2245 | |
RPMI 1640 Medium | Gibco | 61870010 | |
Rspo1-conditioned medium | Homemade | ||
Slide master | Bio-optica | 15-MEQ001 | |
Sorenson’s Phosphate Buffer | EMS | 11600-10 | |
Spinner | Thermo | MY SPIN 6 | |
Sterile serological pipettes | Falcon | 357543 | |
Tissue Casette | Leica | 3802240 | |
Trimmer | Leica | EM TRIM2 | |
Triton X-100 | Thermo Scientific | 28314 | |
TrypLE Express Enzyme | Gibco | 12605010 | |
Trypsin-EDTA | Gibco | 25200-056 | |
Ultramicrotome | Leica | EM UC7 | |
Uranylacetate | EMS | 22400 | |
Vortex | Thermo | 88880018 | |
Wnt Surrogate-Fc Fusion Protein | ImmunoPrecise | N001 | |
Xylene | Sigma | 16446 | |
ZO-1 | Invitrogen | 40-2200 | Dilution: 1/400 (IF) |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved